Most Popular
Recent Blog Posts
National Features >
LettersPublished on April 04, 1996Housebreaking the Lapdog D. Ruffing The Twelfth Man Speaks I state this because of a key line in his article: "The notion of institutional arrogance, especially when it comes to A&M E " was wholly unnecessary. You cannot simply state that an institution such as Texas A&M is arrogant based on one incident, one case, one visit or even a small series of trips and articles. Unless you have attended Texas A&M -- and understand the bond, the spirit, the camaraderie and the spirit that it fosters -- then you have ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT TO MAKE SUCH A STATEMENT. As for the "heavy gold A&M ring" that John Beverly wears, why doesn't Mr. Berryhill learn what all the symbols on that ring mean? Is he aware that the ring is the same design for both sexes -- and that it does not have any differences among all the graduates? Is he aware that the ring's symbols stand for pride in this great state of Texas? Is he aware that symbols on that ring also stand for pride in this country, and an Aggie's devotion to God, family, school, state and country? Is this institutional arrogance? I think not. Texas A&M is a fine institution -- but it is a generally accepted belief that because it lies in College Station, miles from a major urban center, that it must be arrogant because it simply "does as it pleases." Well, that belief is incorrect. It is not an arrogant institution because it lies where it does, or because it embraces its own internal beliefs; rather, it fosters a spirit of hard-working, conservative, proactive leaders in the community and a dedication to what this country stands for. I would not call this institutional arrogance, but rather institutional excellence! Once again, Mr. Berryhill is indeed a fine writer, and an excellent journalist, but I stand by the fact that I highly disagree with his comment. Gilbert Velasquez Jr. Twisted Brodner John Filton
write your comment
|