By Chris Lane
By Jeff Balke
By Aaron Reiss
By Angelica Leicht
By Dianna Wray
By Aaron Reiss
By Camilo Smith
By Craig Malisow
The question was purely rhetorical. The answer, then as now, was "just a dog." As Brian Wallstin's piece and subsequent Press stories made clear, Kelley is a grasping hack politician, devoid of scruples, who'll do and say just about anything to get elected to higher office.
Not everyone agreed. The Chronicle seemed to endorse Kelley about every other week prior to the 1995 election, and some of Bob Lanier's money supporters chipped in to ensure Kelley's smooth ascent to the controller's office, the idea being that Kelley wouldn't be the nuisance to Lanier that George Greanias had been.
And a few weeks after our story appeared, Kelley was elected controller, though barely, over a no-name, underfunded opponent who had made a late entry into the race.
But give Lloyd Kelley time.
In the 21 months that Kelley's been controller, the Chronicle's editorialists have been moved to denounce him even more often than they once endorsed him, most recently after it was revealed that Kelley had cut his former campaign treasurer in for a $75,000 slice of an auditing contract with the controller's office.
Yeah, everybody's on Kelley's case now. A few months ago, Wayne Dolcefino and Channel 13 trained their hidden cameras on Kelley and caught the controller spending an inordinate number of working hours at his new home in the Woodland Heights, tending to his yard, walking his dog and meeting with potential campaign donors.
Channel 13 even followed Kelley to the SplashTown amusement park, where he had ventured one fine summer day in the company of his two children and a female employee of his office.
It was about that time that I came to regret our gimmickry that had transformed Lloyd Kelley into a dog -- as well as the whole "dogboy" thing we subsequently pushed into the local political vernacular. It was all, I'm afraid, a bit over-the-top.
In fact, it was downright mean, and for that I'd like to apologize.
To any and all dogs who were insulted by our association of Lloyd Kelley with their species, I'm truly sorry.
I realize now that likening Kelley to a warm-blooded, four-legged creature noted for its loyalty, attentiveness and good nature was a slander on all members of canis familiaris everywhere.
In my many years of owning dogs, of being chased by dogs, of asking dogs to please pipe down 'cause it's 3 a.m., I've never known one to hide behind its offspring when caught doing something questionable.
Dogs aren't like that.
Lloyd Kelley is.
Certainly, a dog wouldn't exhibit the kind of disloyalty to Houston taxpayers that
Lloyd Kelley has by setting himself up to run for a statewide office next year -- first it was land commissioner, for the last few months it's been a seat on the Railroad Commission -- while seeking re-election as controller in November.
Dogs don't take their masters for chumps.
Lloyd Kelley does.
And I don't believe that even the most unruly, un-housebroken mutt would stand on its hind legs at a public meeting and engage in the kind of reckless character assassination that Lloyd Kelley did on September 20 when he addressed the State Republican Executive Committee in Austin.
By now, you've probably heard what Kelley told the Republican leadership: that he had to win re-election in Houston before he could get on with the business of running for statewide office, and, hey, by the way, his opponent down there -- that would be Judge Sylvia Garcia -- had not only been endorsed by the Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus, but she's gay.
The first observation is true. The second, as Garcia has been having to tell the media constantly since Kelley's speech, is a bald-faced lie.
After his pandering promotional speech, Kelley told an Austin-based Chronicle reporter that, yeah, "it's no secret" that the middle-aged, unmarried Garcia is gay, but it's not really an issue in their contest, and, by the way, the rumor is that Garcia is "dating" a female employee in her office.
Kelley tried to rationalize his slander by saying he was just responding to Garcia's suggestion that he was having an affair with the woman from his office who accompanied him to SplashTown.
Garcia says that, too, is a lie, that all she's done is cite Dolcefino's stories in making the inarguable observation that Kelley isn't being paid almost $100,000 by taxpayers to go to SplashTown or work in his yard.
"I have never mentioned who he was with, but if the shoe fits, yeah, wear it," says Garcia, who's on an unpaid leave as chief judge of the municipal courts. "The issue is, he's not in his office."
Of course, seasoned Lloyd Kelley watchers were hardly surprised he had stooped to gay-baiting. It was just a matter of time.
"The best Garcia could do is beat me up because I took time off to spend with my kids," Kelley told the Chronicle a few days before his Austin speech.