Receive Weekly Email and Text Message Updates:
Sign up for latest info on concerts, dining, promotions and more!
Go!

Related Stories ...

Most Popular

  • Getting Off
    Attorney Tyler Flood says he wins 80 percent of his clients' DWI trials, even if they were 100 percent drunk as a skunk.
  • City of Coffee
    Is Houston about to become America's coffee capital?
  • Looking for a Bull Market
    Killen's Steakhouse in suburban Pearland is probably best during boom times.
  • BBQ Buffet
    Korea Garden Grille offers a stellar selection of barbecue items in unlimited quantities — and new and interesting ways to eat them.
  • Enough About Mi
    Is the authentic little Vietnamese noodle shop Banh Cuon Hoa #2 too adventurous for your tastes?
Most Popular sponsored by

National Features >

  • City Pages

    Michele Bachmann, Unmuzzled

    You don't need to read Sarah Palin's book to hear the ravings of a mad woman.

    By Matt Snyders

  • Miami New Times

    Pimp Daddy

    The rise and fall of a chubby sex-cult leader.

    By Natalie O'Neill

  • Riverfront Times

    Babe 'n' Arms

    Tom was a hot-tempered cross-dresser with a garage full of guns--and then he became Rachel.

    By Nicholas Phillips

Happy Trails

After their little dustup, artist Robert Rauschenberg and art dealer Alfred Kren decide to do business together

Share

  • rss

By Shaila Dewan

Published on April 02, 1998

For all the nasty letters that artist Robert Rauschenberg's camp exchanged with art dealer Alfred Kren during their business dispute ["Culture Clash," by Shaila Dewan, February 26], by their own account they have settled their dispute quite amicably.

So amicably, in fact, that they will be doing business together in the future. Kren's attorney Mitchell Savrick has confirmed that the German dealer will be permitted to sell two Rauschenberg works -- reportedly two of those Kren originally tried to sell -- for a commission as part of the settlement deal.

Kren, claiming that Rauschenberg and Swiss dealer Jamileh Weber owed him part of a commission on works he originally attempted to sell to a collector himself, sued Rauschenberg in a Travis County court in April 1997. Though his original claim was less than $100,000, he won a default judgment of $5.5 million when Rauschenberg failed to appear in court. Kren's lawyers then seized about $6 million worth of the artist's work from the Menil Collection the day after the artist's retrospective opened in February.

Ultimately, the museum got the work back, and apparently Rauschenberg has decided to forgive and forget. "We have agreed to put those problems behind us," says the statement the two issued after reaching an undisclosed settlement. Had Rauschenberg litigated the matter, he might have had a case, but according to his colleague Julie Martin, "He wasn't going to spend the rest of his life doing that. He's 72.