Most Popular
Recent Blog Posts
National Features >
News HostageBy Richard ConnellyPublished on June 17, 1999Be Happy, Serfs "Many employers would be forced to raise prices to compensate for higher employment costs, and the inflationary spiral likely would ignite," the editorial said. "[A] higher minimum wage would no doubt force some already hard-pressed employers to cut back on the number of jobs available even further or to close up shop altogether. It would hurt the very people it may be intended to help." Oh, wait -- that was the Chronicle's editorial from January 7, 1995, the last time Congress was debating a minimum-wage hike. This time around, on June 9, the paper said that "increasing the minimum wage is inflationary and causes unemployment among the poor and uneducated." There wasn't a word about how the last inflation-igniting and unemployment-causing hike, the one they thundered about in 1995, hadn't exactly ignited inflation or sent the unemployment rate skyrocketing. In fact, Chronicle business columnist Jim Barlow wrote a piece June 6 outlining just how tough it was for restaurants and other minimum-wage employers to find people. Barlow may have inadvertently exposed the paper's real reason for loathing every proposed minimum-wage hike. Despite all the lofty talk about how such hikes really hurt the poor, maybe the Chron's motivations are more elitist. The 1995 rate hike has been good for restaurant managers, Barlow wrote, because they've seen their salaries jump. "But the hard part," he said, "is managers must learn to treat employees with respect ... if they wish to keep those employees." Good God, not that. Will the evil perpetrated by Bill Clinton never stop? "So the next time your service is slow, it could well be the restaurant is doing the best it can with what it has," he wrote. As are we all, Jim. Oh, My God, It's John Ritter! In her live standup on the late news, Rogers squealed that "with all the athletes and entertainment stars here, Houston felt like Hollywood! ... I've been an entertainment reporter for nine years, and this is my most memorable event!" "That's quite a testimony," enthused anchor Dominique Sachse. We guess the other Gatlin brothers had schedule conflicts. Yakov Smirnov, too. To be fair, maybe we misheard Rogers. Surely she didn't say that "Houston felt like Hollywood." She must have said, "Houston felt like Hollywood Squares." Not As We Do (Part I) So we didn't think twice when Chronicle sports-media columnist David Barron weighed in on the messy brouhaha over whether Drayton McLane thinks that being a baseball fan requires an Ivy League degree, especially if you're Hispanic. As everyone in Houston knows, Spanish-speaking Channel 48 broadcast a report that McLane made disparaging remarks about Hispanics during an awards-dinner conversation, which the Astros owner denies. Barron scolded 48 for running with the story, saying among other things that they should have broadened its scope. "They could have held their peace, placed one call Friday morning to Major League Baseball and learned -- as I did with the one call I placed Friday afternoon -- that the average MLB club's Hispanic fan share is 12 percent," he scoffed, adding that a single call to the Astros would reveal the local Hispanic market share is only 8 percent. Fine. Except we, too, made a single call to Major League Baseball, and the results were a little murkier than Barron's lecture would indicate. MLB spokesman Richard Levine says there are no current statistics that measure market share by race or ethnicity. He said he told as much to the Chronicle reporter who called him. "I said that we didn't have anything but that just talking off the top of my head I remember we did something maybe eight or ten years ago, and I think it showed 12 percent of the people going to games were Hispanics, but I can't find the study, and I know that we haven't done any studies since," Levine said. So the (vaguely remembered) information is outdated, at best. Readers certainly didn't get that impression, however, from Barron's condescending lesson to Channel 48 on how to be a reporter. Barron says Levine never used the phrase "eight or ten years ago." The columnist said he thought he had indicated in his story that the info was old. "I was aware the information was somewhat outdated, but it does not appear that that fact made it in there," he said, after rereading his piece. Johnny Holmes Is Innocent!
write your comment
|