By Chris Lane
By Jeff Balke
By Aaron Reiss
By Angelica Leicht
By Dianna Wray
By Aaron Reiss
By Camilo Smith
By Craig Malisow
What happened in the park that day is in dispute. Patricia Fuentes, who lives next door, called police and claimed that Ross had exposed himself and stroked his genitals within view of her and her two young boys. Ross has no criminal record or history of sexual deviancy, and his relatives say he has never engaged in any sexual behavior around their children. They believe he was simply relieving himself in a park with no restrooms, staring blankly into space and having difficulty from a persistent urinary tract problem.
Whichever version is true, it hardly justifies what happened after Houston police arrested Ross and took him to the county jail. He was charged with exposing himself to minors "to arouse and gratify his sexual desire." Ross was shuttled between the county jail and Vernon State Hospital for the criminally insane for nearly a year, his lawyer unable to challenge the charge because Ross was deemed incompetent to face trial.
Dueling psychiatrists muddied the water. A hospital staff physician found Ross to be delusional and potentially dangerous to himself and others. A psychiatrist for the Harris County Mental Health-Mental Retardation Authority examined Ross in jail last month and found him to be mildly retarded, not mentally ill, and harmless.
"There is no evidence of dangerousness to self or others," wrote Dr. Debra Osterman. "Would not benefit from hospitalization. Likely to do best if returned to live with his niece and family."
"I think what has happened to this poor old man is close to cruel and unusual punishment," says his attorney, Jonathan Paull. "If somebody who was not mentally ill or mentally retarded came to me with the same problem, in that he 'flashed' somebody, he would be on deferred adjudication right now."
Forest Jordan, an in-law of Ross's who has employed him for years in his landscaping business, says the man's year-long odyssey through the criminal justice system is the real crime.
"No way in the world you can justify this," says Jordan. "You've got drug dealers going downtown and stay 24 hours, 90 days. C'mon. You got crack dealers being treated better than this."
Awaiting a hearing last week before Judge Mary Lou Keel, Ross was a pathetically lost figure in the court's holding cell. "Hey, get the old man," laughed one of the young male prisoners when Ross's name was called. Ross shuffled slowly to the interview window in his orange jail overalls. He was unable to explain where he was or why he was there. He simply kept repeating, "I'm going home."
He finally did, the next day. Family members put up the $500 to bail him out. Niece Lillie Haynes says the family tried to get Ross out of jail over the past year and were repeatedly told he was being held without bond, and later on $30,000 bond. Prosecutor Terese Buess says that the bond was originally $5,000. Jail records back her up, though the family would seem to have no reason to misstate what jail staff told them. Once they were notified of the actual bond amount, the family scraped together the money.
Attorney Paull believes Ross's predicament was a catch-22 situation that prevented an innocent man from confronting his accusers in court. A defense investigator questioned the woman who reported Ross to police and drew an admission from her that he could have been urinating. The witness also reported seeing Ross run across the street, and he is physically incapable of that.
"I couldn't proceed to trial and put this woman on the stand and show she wasn't telling the truth, because if he's not competent to stand trial they won't allow that to happen," explains Paull. "So they have to put him through the wringer to have him gain competency, or else have an assessment to see if he's dangerous. It's not the judge or the prosecutor's fault, but it's a flaw in the system."
Assistant D.A. Buess maintains she had a valid case against Ross. "If it were a matter of somebody just urinating and the kid walking in, then chances are this case would never have been filed this way. Filed as a misdemeanor or something. If I believed he was just urinating, this case wouldn't have gotten as far as it did." She declined to address the contradictions in the witness statements, saying the case was still in progress.
The prosecutor is also unimpressed with Ross's previously spotless past. "I deal with sex offenders day in and day out who have never been charged with anything before," explains Buess. "Because someone hasn't been charged with something doesn't mean they necessarily haven't done it in the past."