By Jef With One F
By Bob Ruggiero
By Corey Deiterman
By Marco Torres
By Angelica Leicht
By Angelica Leicht
By Charne Graham
Alternative newsweeklies from across the country lie in stacks on two cloth-covered, cafeteria-size tables inside the Austin Convention Center's exhibition hall, SXSW trade-show headquarters. Bloated with booths boasting dot-com thises or dot-com thats, this hall, bigger than a football field, is from end zone to end zone prime real estate. But the spot at the hall's main entrance, only the size of two open doorways, is beachfront property. After all, it's the first setup passersby see walking in. This enviable locale is where the Austin Chronicle, an alternative newsweekly whose editor launched the festival, has chosen to set up shop and display copies of its paper, along with a few others, including The Rocket (Seattle), the San Antonio Current and (yours truly) the Houston Press.
Like the aforementioned alternative newsweeklies, 31 others also sponsor this event, now in its 17th year. Since its creation, SXSW has been accepting sponsorship from its brothers and sisters in alternative press-land. And every year, according to Brent Grulke, music festival director of SXSW (which annually hosts a film and Internet-related event, too), the for-profit organization has also been requesting artistic advice from its peers in the press.
Every year, says Grulke, SXSW asks its alt-press sponsors to choose a band or two from their respective coverage areas for participation in SXSW's highly regarded performance showcases. SXSW folk figure that no one knows Long Island or San Francisco bands better than the alternative publications that regularly cover those acts. "We believe the alternative press is who we are," says Grulke. "They have a good sense of which acts should benefit" from playing SXSW. Daily papers (lazy, critically predictable publicity rags) aren't even considered. But although this sentiment of brotherhood in action is sound in theory, it unfortunately is defective in practice. Let us count the ways.
One, SXSW's name -- and only SXSW's name -- is affixed to the event. SXSW, or any art advocacy group, naturally compromises its artistic integrity by allowing outsiders to impact its selection process. Simply reading the names of sponsoring papers and their bands, which this year have been published in the event's accompanying information booklet, is enough to make one raise an eyebrow.
Two, Grulke admits SXSW does not always know which employees at its sponsors' papers actually make selections. "We would prefer it be editorial," says Grulke. "We would prefer the music editor or the general editor do the selecting. How each paper decides to handle that is up to them. Given our duties here, we can't dictate to them that....But we just don't rubber-stamp everything." Two and a half, not knowing decision-makers simply invites impropriety, especially considering sponsorship is coordinated among SXSW staffers and promotions managers or publishers, not between SXSW staff and editorial heads. If the publisher of Chicago's New City receives an invitation from SXSW to choose which bands from northeastern Illinois make the SXSW showcase and he feels that his younger brother's punk group is deserving of a break, SXSW would unknowingly be playing politics, not music.
As explains Zac Crain, music editor of the Dallas Observer (which is owned by the Houston Press's parent company, New Times, Inc.), if it weren't for the levelheadedness of his paper's retail coordinator and SXSW liaison, Dana Escobar, he might not have ever seen the SXSW request. No one at SXSW, as far as Crain knows, told Escobar to pass the request on to him or anyone else in editorial. That it landed on his desk was a godsend. "If we choose a band we [in editorial] don't like," he says, "I'm gonna have a lot of explaining to do." New Times Los Angelesmusic editor Bill Holdship understands the issue: He had "zilch" input in his paper's selections.
Third, and most important, no matter how diligently SXSW screens all its applicants, a band may believe its road to Austin has been paved by its local alternative paper, creating the impression that relationships, not musical ability, opened doors. "I think it's difficult for everyone," says Grulke. "But ultimately I think it's a critical and important thing to do."
That important? To bolster sponsor relations, maybe. Says Roni M. Sarig, music editor of Atlanta's reputable Creative Loafing: "I wish they wouldn't ask.I'd just as soon not do this. I think it's a neat thing they do, and it sounds good. I like the idea of it, but when you get down to it, I feel a little uncomfortable putting weight behind one band."
For the record, the Houston Press selected Japanic as its band.
Not Down with DownloadsNearly every one of the thousand or so bands performing at SXSW this year has some sort of Web presence, except some of the most popular and successful acts at the festival and beyond: rappers and hip-hoppers. Thing is, non-major-label-affiliated rappers don't need the Web. Yet. Though their fan base is, for the most part, off-line and more interested in the touch and feel of vinyl than of plastic floppy discs filled with MP3 or MP4 files, rappers and hip-hoppers are not reaching as many listeners as possible. And it doesn't take a wizard to realize zero Web presence will eventually be a handicap.