School's Out Forever

"Unschoolers" like Holly Furgason don't believe in public education. They don't even believe in teachers. They believe in the ability of their children to teach themselves. Will the law catch up with them?

The Furgason home has the relaxed feel of a place where you could take a nap in the middle of the afternoon without guilt. A squeaking ceiling fan churns the warm air inside the modest rent house, isolated from its working-class neighborhood by three-fourths of an overgrown acre. Two mismatched blue couches near an ancient Zenith invite inactivity; in fact, they were probably never too nice for such laziness. An old black dog sprawls across the cool concrete of the front porch where he's tethered. But mostly, the slow pace comes from Holly Furgason herself.

She's a round woman, with a kindly, round face. She wears comfortable clothes -- jeans with T-shirts and tennis shoes -- and her long brown hair is pulled back in a bun, with wispy grays forming a fuzzy halo above her forehead.

"Downtime," says Furgason comfortingly, "thinking, resting, relaxing, is just as important as uptime."

Yes, you could take a nap here, if you happened to be in the Furgason house at a time when there wasn't so much activity going on. On this day a rooster is crowing through the bars of an open window; a half-sheltie, half-chow pup is chasing a six-year-old and her balloon around the linoleum; and three older kids, ages ten to 15, are talking loud and fast at the kitchen table. It's a school day, but the Furgason children don't go to school. They never have. They don't do anything resembling schoolwork when they're at home either. In fact, they're playing Pokémon, the bane of an elementary school teacher's existence. Furgason looks on proudly. "Are we normal enough for you?" she says with a laugh.

Furgason is normal in the sense that she wants what's best for her children. She simply doesn't think what's best for them is public school, or traditional homeschooling, for that matter. The Furgasons are unschoolers, a small subset of homeschoolers who keep their kids out of school for educational rather than religious reasons and operate with no textbooks, exercises, assignments, drills or even set subjects to study. The idea is to let children continue with the natural learning process that starts in infancy, when babies begin to walk and talk and take in the world without much adult instruction. If given half a chance, these parents believe, children would tackle grammar and arithmetic with the same fearless curiosity. The unschooling mantra: "Birds fly. Fish swim. Children learn." You can't stop them, you don't need to help them, and you certainly shouldn't force them.

The Furgason family makes its home in one of the most unregulated homeschooling states in the country. In fact, some 75,000 families teach their own children in Texas, a place where pro-government is politically incorrect, where an individual's freedom to destroy his own mind is virtually a constitutional right, and where liberals will argue the sanctity of parental authority as fiercely as conservatives. But even here, Furgason's extremely laissez-faire approach to her children's education may cross the line of reason, and the law.


Furgason had a "typical public school experience" growing up in Buffalo, New York. She was an early reader, so she started kindergarten at the age of four. A shy, well-behaved girl, she did well in class until high school, when she blew off school two or three days a week and ultimately failed her senior year. What happened to the good student?

She remembers sitting in the back of the classroom quietly reading Kafka -- in German. She got detention for it. She asked her teacher how the founding fathers came up with their ideas for the government of a new nation. The answer: That's not on the test. Partly as a joke and partly as an experiment, she took the ACT without looking at the questions and scored a very high 32. She no longer bought into the system.

Furgason wonders how incidents like these didn't quash her love of learning. Perhaps it was because she was so shy; she had nothing better to do than sit at home and read. Fiction, nonfiction, textbooks, encyclopedias, biographies, newspapers, magazines -- she was indiscriminate, as long as the material interested her. At some point she happened upon a book called How Children Fail, by educational reformer John Holt. "Of course," she thought, "I had been one of those kids who failed."

Holt taught elementary school for ten years, all the while trying to figure out how to make the public school system better at fostering learning. But by the late 1970s he had decided that real reform was impossible and that parents should educate their children at home. It was then that he coined the term "unschooling."

"The question I have been trying to answer for many years is, Why don't they learn what we try to teach them?" he wrote in a 1982 revision to the '60s classic How Children Fail. "The answer I have come to boils down to this: Because we teach them -- that is, try to control the contents of their minds."

Holt's ideas made sense to Furgason, who believes she unschooled herself all her life. "Kids are not inherently lazy, stupid creatures. They want to learn, want to know, want to understand the world around them," she says. "I wish I could sue the schools I went to for keeping me from getting an education."

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next Page >>
 
  • Andrea Martin 09/30/2010 3:00:00 AM

    I unschooled my son through age 12.5, when I placed him a public school gifted program so I could undergo medical treatment and hold down a full time job with insurance. Soon after entering school, he earned a 31 out of 36 on his ACT Composite score. That's better than 98% of college bound seniors--at the age of 12. Less than a year later, he earned a 2150 out of 2400 on his SAT, at age 13. Soon after turning 17, he took both the ACT and SAT while recovering from an illness. He earned perfect scores on his SAT and his ACT, as well as a 237 out of 240 on his PSAT at age 16, a perfect 800 out of 800 on his SAT II Math 2 and several perfect AP scores. Now, as a senior, my son is taking all university and AP courses and is legally a homeschooler. Sadly, we are experiencing retaliation from the public school for withdrawing him to homeschool him. He was ill at the time and needed rest to recover and complete his semester as a homeschooler. He had earned a place in the Top 3% of his class last year. Still, the school is averaging in zeros from incomplete assignments due to missed days due to illness and calling those his grades. He didn't even have enough days to get credit under Texas guidelines. The head counselor refused to allow my son to have his National Hispanic Scholar application sent specifically for him, even when the National Hispanic Recognition Program indicated that they should had it over. And, I still haven't gotten any records from the school. Their excuse is illogical. Though he was in the Top 3% officially and featured in the paper as such, the superintendent has claimed that "His grades dropped...we can't let students withdraw to homeschool if they aren't doing well and just make up a grade." She claimed that giving credit with grades based in part on work not completed while absent or withdrawn would prevent students from deceiving colleges by "making up" grades while enrolled in homeschool. This superintendent made this statement after she consulted with the district's attorney and looking at my son's records. She should know that my son was a top performer, even when ill and missing classes. She should know that he is considered one of the most eager students in the school and is well known among his teachers as "energizing" a classroom and bringing a lot of outside knowledge to discussions--knowledge gained as he continued to unschool himself while enrolled in public high school. Further, those arguments are irrelevant. The student transferred to homeschool during the semester without enough attendance days to get credit. He should receive I's for Incomplete, as she initially said. She is now saying that perhaps my eager learner who is being recruited by top national universities as I write this, even with free college visitings, may have just been "bored" instead of sick when he missed days of school. This inventive theory would be irrelevant even if it were true. But, it's the furthest thing from the truth. The truth is that the school resents me withdrawing my son to allow him to recover from an illness and continuing to homeschool him after he completed that semester and began taking several sophomore and junior in college level courses not available at the public high school. Though some of my son's former public school teachers were true gems, wonderful partners in his education, the administration is proving to be political, treating my son as an award-winning commodity. I would point out that my son was instrumental in taking the school's Quiz Bowl team to first and second place standings in the state and then competing in Nationals. It was primarily his knowledge gained by unschooling that allowed him to do this. He was unschooled since birth and continued to unschool himself during his entire time in public school and does so today. When I read shrill criticism of unschooling by those in the educational establishment, it saddens me. In reality, unschooling is simply not clumping kids like fish and making them all do the same thing at the same time like as fish in a school of fish do. It doesn't mean "not educating." While my son had almost no formal education before he was placed in public school, he was very actively educated. No, I didn't spoon feed him anything. I taught him how to educate himself and provided an extremely rich educational environment. I was there for him, with him and for him. He had wonderful, rich exposure to an extremely broad range of people and developed very healthy social skills, far better than many kids in public school have. No one who knows my son or knew him at any time in his life could argue that he was less educated than the average publicly educated child. Just the opposite. He stunned a Nobel laureate in physics when discussing black holes at age eight. At seven, he was reading eight hundred pages a day of things like Tolkien's Trilogy. At five, he was reading at the tenth grade level. As for math, he learned to multiply fractions at age 5 by converting a biscuit recipe in his head to two thirds the original volume. He did not learn these things on his own, but in the right environment and with the right stimuli for him, he thought for himself and developed a confidence in math computations beyond his years--without doing formal math problems and without a detailed, written advance plan. This past summer, my son was one of seventy two in the world who were selected to participate in a rigorous summer science program. He excelled, even in physics, which had been an exceedingly weak course at his former public high school. He excelled at physics because he had studied college physics on his own FOR FUN before taking the high school course which failed at that high school. He is now taking the higher level AP Physics course online. Public school educators, please do your research before you sound off about homeschooling of any sort. You are not experts in homeschooling, you have not been to many homeschooler's homes, if any. You typically have read no independent studies about homeschooling. Homeschoolers, don't take unschooling lightly. Unschooling effectively, in my opinion, can take more effort by far and skill than run of the mill homeschooling with canned materials. The average American home is not well suited to unschooling well because it's centered around television and video games. The average American family does not constantly provide educational opportunities for its children. Remember, unschooling does not mean not educating. It's not a passive, wait and see experiment. It's focused on the individual needs and interests of the children, and, no, the children will not always verbally tell you what their needs are. You have to observe and provide, at the right time, in the right way. The writer of this article implies up front that an unschooled child will end up with few skills. In my personal experience, that is the opposite of the case. Lest anyone think that my child was floundering before he entered public school late in his childhood, remember that his scores were through the roof right away, and he was the only one at the school with those scores. He regularly contributed knowledge to the classroom beyond what the teacher had planned, and the vast majority of teachers loved this. I am delighted to give due credit to the public school where they did contribute, but I will also unashamedly give myself credit for producing not merely an honor student who knows what he is taught in school, but a truly well educated and self-educating young man. I hope that as we attempt to get the school district to follow the guidelines of the state of Texas and the standards the superintendent quoted to me when I met her, my son's senior year will be relieved of the burden of struggling with a school district comprised of educated adults whose motto includes the phrase "We are responsible" and will be free to request an accurate, ethically compiled transcript as he applies to top national universities. Retaliation for homeschooling has no place in public education or education of any kind. As you read this article, please understand that the families who call themselves unschoolers vary widely in their practices and in their results. If I were to have listed the textbooks I used to unschool my son in one year, they would number in the hundreds most years. And, if I were to list the field trips my son went on each year, they would number close to two hundred in some years, and I'm not referring to going to the grocery store, though that can be a valid field trip if education is taking place during the trip. If I were to have listed the educational encounters he had with other people per year, they would number several dozen in meaningful, unique encounters with new people. Community service-check. Real life math problems-check. Great literature-check. Writing-check. Economics-check. Vocabulary-check. Each activity was not designated to cover only one topic. We really made every day count when unschooling. Let's all do that in whatever setting we use. And, let's stop trying to tear down people who do it another way without really walking in their shoes, getting real data on the results, and opening up our closed minds to consider the purpose of education, well beyond the ADA and how many awards we can publicize in the paper. Hopefully, my son's former public school will remember that their taxpayer supported jobs are to promote and support education for the sake of the children and society--not to rack up career trophies by boasting of their wins and tripping up "the competition."

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy