By Chris Lane
By Jeff Balke
By Aaron Reiss
By Angelica Leicht
By Dianna Wray
By Aaron Reiss
By Camilo Smith
By Craig Malisow
In the grand scheme of things, millionaire banker-businessman Tony Sanchez would provide the brown and the bucks in the governor's contest. Former Dallas mayor Ron Kirk would add the black and the charisma in the Senate race, and ex-comptroller John Sharp would provide the white and the political machine in the fight for lieutenant governor. In a state where only 34 percent of registered voters call themselves Republican and 31 percent Democrats, the idea was that the dream team would goose turnout at the polls, appeal to independents and lead its people out of Big Bend or whatever wilderness the party's been sojourning in for the last decade.
In this carefully calculated formula, Bentsen's intrusion was about as welcome as that of Victor Morales, the lone ranger schoolteacher from North Texas. His pickup-truck-and-spare-change campaign had already gone up against Gramm once, and Morales felt he deserved another shot. Party leadership didn't need or want an extra Anglo or a flaky Hispanic muddling the mix. Ron Kirk was what the political doctor had ordered.
Equally noxious to the ticket masters was the surprise crash landing of former Texas attorney general Dan Morales in the governor's contest, though his entrance was belatedly recognized as a blessing. It gave neophyte candidate Sanchez an excuse to spend millions on identity-establishing television ads. That would prepare him for the coming battle with Rick Perry, the lieutenant governor who rose to the top when George W. Bush moved to the White House.
On Election Night last week, a still-hopeful Bentsen stood in front of the cameras with wife Tamra at Treebeards on Market Square and predicted the uncounted Harris County vote would revive his slumping percentages and confound the party movers and shakers. It never happened, largely because Harris County blacks gave Kirk enough support to leapfrog Bentsen into the runoff with Morales. While Kirk took nearly 30 percent of the vote in Houston, the congressman got only 17 percent of the total in Dallas County.
"Gotta give Kirk some credit," observes Dr. Richard Murray, director of the University of Houston Center for Public Policy. "He mopped up in his home ballpark, and Bentsen did just okay down here. We have a lot of black voters, and at the end of the day, they moved toward Kirk."
Recent history might have warned Bentsen of this electoral cul-de-sac. His predecessor, Mike Andrews, got the itch to run for the U.S. Senate in 1994. He too got squeezed out of the primary runoff battle between Dallas investor Richard Fisher and former attorney general Jim Mattox. Andrews is now a big-bucks Washington lobbyist. Bentsen is expected to return to his Houston banking and finance career.
Bentsen made the same mistake as Andrews in thinking that congressional terms had given him a statewide profile. They hadn't, and the party's organizational tilt toward Kirk gave him the funds to outspend Bentsen two to one. While Kirk ads ran on Houston television, Bentsen was a non-presence in Dallas.
"They didn't expect to do this with anything other than television and money," says Bentsen consultant Dan McClung of Campaign Strategies. "And Kirk had most of the Democratic apparatus that gives money behind him."
The only remaining primary hurdle for the Democrats' rainbow ticket is iconoclast Victor Morales, who narrowly led Kirk into the runoff. The Tony Sanchez campaign, awash in its candidate's millions, is expected to throw its support behind Kirk.
While Sanchez strategist Glenn Smith says no decision has been made to intervene, the candidate's operatives in Houston's Hispanic community are already preparing for the tricky task of going to bat for a black candidate against a Latino. Consultant Marc Campos, who had the same mission for Mayor Lee Brown against Orlando Sanchez in last fall's mayoral race, expects elected Hispanic officials to line up with Kirk and take some heat.
"They're going to come after us again for not supporting the Hispanic," figures Campos. "But when you got guys like [former San Antonio mayor and HUD Secretary] Henry Cisneros who are heavy into the Kirk campaign, that's going to help us."
Democrats believe the real help will come in November, when most African-American votes for Kirk will likely appear on ballots marked for Sanchez and Sharp.
The Ties That Bind
Whatever critics may say about state Senator John Whitmire, no one's ever accused him of a shortage of gall. Six years after a controversial $80,000 consulting contract with the Harris County Adult Probation Department made Whitmire the target of a probe by the district attorney's office, the senator has hired the ousted probation director to serve on his staff in Austin. Larance Coleman will be paid $4,000 a month, a little less than the fee his agency was paying Whitmire back in 1995.
In 1997, a grand jury indicted Coleman for perjury in civil litigation regarding the construction of the county's Baker Street facility and the alleged misuse of millions of county dollars. A judicial panel overseeing his agency fired Coleman. A visiting judge later dismissed the indictment, finding that the statute of limitations had expired, and Coleman disappeared into the private sector. Now he's back as the senator's criminal justice adviser.
At least one county source found it unbelievable that Whitmire would resurrect the controversy by hiring Coleman, who will handle county funding requests from the folks who booted him out the door. The senator was unapologetic.
"He's sitting and working with the criminal justice committee as we talk," explained Whitmire. He lauded Coleman as "a very qualified employee who has been recognized a long time as one of the best and most competent persons dealing with those matters."
While Whitmire praised Coleman's previous work in the private sector, he could not recall the name of his new hire's former employer or recent work history. "I don't know that we got a résumé," Whitmire said. "I've worked with Larance for years, and he was probably the best probation director in the state, and maybe the nation."
As for the perjury charges, Whitmire waves them off as the result of a feud between the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and the county.
"Larance just got caught up in that crossfire," says Whitmire. "I challenge you to find anybody else in Harris County who's ever been indicted on perjury in a civil lawsuit." He says his own consulting contract with the probation department was legal, and his hiring of Coleman is equally justified.
"I cannot handle the workload of the criminal justice matters without his assistance, and I've been looking for the right person, and I'm very fortunate he's available." No doubt Coleman feels the same way.
We Don't Know Nothing 'Bout Birthin' No Enron
Houston legal giant Vinson & Elkins recently dispatched a three-page letter addressed "To Our Clients and Friends," offering some soothing thoughts on the law firm's controversial relationship with Enron. According to author Harry Reasoner, the firm's former managing partner, media reports and congressional hearings have "created a great deal of misunderstanding and misinformation" regarding V&E's role in the largest business collapse in American history. Reasoner just wanted to set a few things straight. He later took the same pitch to the media in interviews.
First, noted Harry, V&E had no role in advising Enron on waiving conflict-of-interest rules -- the ones involving Chief Financial Officer Andy Fastow and those nasty little outside partnerships with the Star Wars names. As for any illegalities involved in the deals, Reasoner explains that V&E does not do accounting, so don't hold it responsible for funny figures.
There also was that troublesome info that whistle-blower Sherron Watkins asked CEO Ken Lay to investigate. Reasoner would like you all to know that since Fastow had already resigned his partnership positions and the deals had been terminated, there was nothing for the firm to pursue further.
"Thus," declared Reasoner, "the concerns on which Ms. Watkins had focused had been addressed by the time our report was delivered."
For those inclined to ask more sticky questions, Reasoner points out that any advice V&E actually gave Enron cannot be discussed because the firm is bound "by professional obligations of confidentiality."
"Please call me or your contacts at the firm if you have any concerns we may address," he concluded. "We value our relationship with you greatly."
How much? Oh, about $250 per hour, minimum.