By Chris Lane
By Jeff Balke
By Aaron Reiss
By Angelica Leicht
By Dianna Wray
By Aaron Reiss
By Camilo Smith
By Craig Malisow
The target of the invective, the normally unflappable provost Edward Patrick Sheridan, scowled as his face reddened, according to a nearby professor.
"That would not be helpful," he snapped.
Professors from the Liberal Arts and Social Sciences College demanded an after-the-fact vote on the forced merger of their previously separate colleges, a change enacted by Sheridan's fiat two years before. But they might just as well have been referring to the tenure of the provost himself. The 65-year-old clinical psychologist has attempted to centralize the campus academic bureaucracy down to the department chair level, sparking charges that he plays mind games while trampling on UH traditions of administrators and faculty sharing authority.
Sheridan's latest moves have transformed simmering resentment into an open rebellion not seen since a similar wave of protest led to the 1995 exit of chancellor Alex Schilt and president Jim Pickering. As current Chancellor/President Arthur K. Smith enters what's expected to be his last year before retirement, faculty unrest promises to make the future transition a rocky ride.
Since Smith took over from interim chancellor and former Texas lieutenant governor Bill Hobby in late 1996, his reign has been marked by a series of incidents over increasing centralization of campus authority. General counsel Dennis Duffy reorganized the school's legal office. That triggered female employees' charges of gender discrimination and a $400,000 court judgment against the university for retaliating against one of them.
A clash with the campus police chief over the preferential handling of an athlete's theft case resulted in the eventual ouster of that top cop and a rewriting of UH staff rules to allow termination without cause.
In recent years a steady stream of high-profile UH academicians have been wooed away by competing institutions -- the latest being Richard Blackett, an endowed chair of African-American history who headed to Vanderbilt. Several department chairs fault Smith and Sheridan for failing to make the effort and provide the incentives to keep their academic stars.
Smith, expected to announce his retirement next fall, is an increasingly distant campus presence. As his highly visibly No. 2, Sheridan has become the focus in the struggle to shape the giant urban campus in the impending post-Smith era.
It didn't help that the only real news to come out of the Kiva meeting was the resignation of gerontology specialist Andy Achenbaum as dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences. Sheridan diplomatically told the group that Achenbaum wanted to return to teaching, although it was widely regarded as a resignation forced by the boss -- just as the dean's earlier appointment of Sheridan's wife, Kathy, as one of his two associate deans was regarded as a dictate from Sheridan.
Former associate dean and law professor Robert Carp believes most problems with Sheridan can be traced to his insistence on micromanaging to an almost manic degree.
"That might be fine in a household or business, but in running a university of 32,000 persons, it just can't be done," says Carp. "So as a result, you have paralysis at virtually all levels of the administrative process because you can't get any answer from him on anything. That's the way it is now."
According to Carp, the outwardly placid Sheridan is a stickler for details who may rant at subordinates for using the wrong word in a memo. Carp says the failure of the provost's office to announce a budget for this summer is typical.
Political science grad students don't even know "whether they can be employed or feed their families," explains the professor. "Worthwhile projects are delayed or don't come to fruition because there's no knowledge of what the budget is going to be We've got to go to the 'gods' in the Cullen building to find out if there's going to be toilet paper in the bathrooms, and that gets tiring after a while."
History professor Robert Buzzanco stunned the campus two weeks ago with an op-ed column in The Daily Cougar student newspaper, blasting the administration's drive to squelch any semblance of shared decision-making.
"Whenever UH faculty members get together formally," wrote Buzzanco, "we are virtually unanimous in our condemnation of the Smith-Sheridan gang. But we do virtually nothing but gripe about it, and thereby give the administration a green light to continue its plundering of our reputation, our rights as faculty, and the students' rights "
Buzzanco says the administration's knee-jerk crackdown on dissent stems from its emphasis on militaristic command. "Smith is an old military guy, and Sheridan went to seminary for a while. They think of the world in a structured, authoritarian way."
English professor Maria Gonzalez agrees: "I've never seen a military model at a university in my life." She says Sheridan wrongly assumes that department chairs are supposed to be delivering messages for the dean. "A department's chair has the responsibility of keeping the integrity of the curriculum and the research that comes out of that department," she says.