By Chris Lane
By Jeff Balke
By Aaron Reiss
By Angelica Leicht
By Dianna Wray
By Aaron Reiss
By Camilo Smith
By Craig Malisow
Poorly executed: Wow! Are you printing freshman comp exercises from HCC now? That was the weakest thing I have ever read in your rag ["No Pain, No Gain," by Richard Connelly, May 26].
Life-or-death lottery: I am not a fan of the death penalty, but there is a way to make the process faster, without destroying the rights of the prisoners:
Allow one large-scope appeal to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Within 30 days after rejection of that appeal, the prisoner may take the option of risking immediate execution.
The prisoner would get strapped in and hooked up to the death mechanism and, at some point, would be told he has 30 seconds to pick one of three buttons. One would activate the poison; the other two would activate a water IV. If the prisoner survives, he would be informed five minutes after the process starts. He would be paroled in 20 years with good behavior, and breaking parole would result in waiting 20 more years for the normal life-sentence parole to become available.
Those convicted of murders for hire and premeditated murders, like those by "Candy Man" killer Ronald Clark O'Bryan, and some others would be ineligible.
Advantages would include speedy justice, and juries could sentence multiple murderers to subsequent death sentences, increasing their odds of execution. And victims' families could see what they really want to see from the condemned prisoner: fear, the kind their family member must have faced.
The Death Penalty Information Center Web site quotes a 1992 news article that says a Texas death penalty case costs an average of $2.3 million -- about three times that of imprisoning someone in a single cell at the highest security level for 40 years.
Not OK Corral
Penned in: Your report on what happened at the Halliburton protest on May 18 was the most accurate portrayal I have seen so far ["Horse Shoed," by Josh Harkinson, May 26]. I was one of the participants in the demonstration, and had unknowingly stopped right by the parking garage exit.
The police horses were so close to me that I was petting one's face until his police rider demanded, "Don't touch the horse!" (My back was already near the building; the police were on the sidewalks in our faces, basically, before anything happened.) I had no idea what was happening or even that we were in a wrong place (an exit) when the police just began riding their horses into us.
Thank you very much for the excellent, factual coverage. A number of us are pursuing this police action in hopes of having an investigation and corrections, so that nothing like this will ever be repeated.
Media silence: Thanks for having the balls to tell the story of what really happened outside the Four Seasons.
With every other so-called news outlet sitting on this story (including the public radio station KUHF), it's somewhat heartening to see the Press has not fallen lock-step into the "code of silence" that has gripped our nation's news media.
HPD displayed a clear agenda of political oppression that day, and everyone should know that.
Thanks for doing your job, HP. It's hard to find a reporter willing to do that these days.
Joseph Michael Gabriel
Boys in the hood: Well, I wasn't at the Halliburton demonstration, but I did see coverage of it on TV. What I saw was the so-called peaceful demonstrators wearing hoods and striking horses.
Protesters do not have the right to block sidewalks or the entrances to parking garages. They can protest within limits -- and those limits do not include the right to interfere with businesses and pedestrian traffic.
The whole aim of the protesters is media coverage. If there is no incident, then they don't get the media coverage. Knowing this, I seriously doubt that they do absolutely nothing to provoke the police. As you state in your article, their Web site called for them to be "uncooperative." I believe they desperately wanted an incident to happen.
Why no mention of the demonstrators' hoods? If they are passionate about their cause and believe enough in it to demonstrate, why are they wearing hoods to conceal their identities? It would seem that they are in fact ashamed of their actions. It reminded me of another organization -- one that has a series of K's in its name.
Serious journalism: I want to personally thank Press staff writers Josh Harkinson and Keith Plocek for the truly fair and balanced report on the recent Halliburton shareholders' meeting protest.
I and seven others were arrested inside the Four Seasons Hotel that morning. The article was a breath of fresh air after the top daily paper and news stations in Houston sensationalized the violence factor and spun the protest story to sound as if the 50-plus officers in attendance had something to fear from peaceful protesters.
Thank you, Houston Press, for being there that day and looking at both sides of the story before plunging ahead. I wish other local journalists took their jobs as seriously.