By Chris Lane
By Jeff Balke
By Aaron Reiss
By Angelica Leicht
By Dianna Wray
By Aaron Reiss
By Camilo Smith
By Craig Malisow
Preservation groups have been fighting for years to get some sort of ordinance protecting historic buildings, without much success. So they were a little surprised July 12 to find out the city had prepared a proposed law and was rushing to get it passed.
If ever a situation called for an "on the one hand " analysis by preservationists, it was this. On the one hand, the city was actually doing something about preservation. On the other hand it was the city doing it, without any input from the people who care about this stuff.
The proposed ordinance declares no building more than 20 years old shall be destroyed except under extraordinary circumstances, which are defined as: a) a developer wants to put up a strip mall anchored by a Blockbuster; or b) the developer pays a $20 fee.
Actually, it doesn't say that, but you can't blame preservationists for thinking it might.
City Councilwoman Pam Holm unveiled the proposed ordinance at a Quality of Life subcommittee meeting, much to the surprise of those present.
Jane Cahill, chair of the Old Sixth Ward Reinvestment Zone, says -- On the One Hand -- that she wants preservation done "faster rather than slower," but -- On the Other Hand -- "I can't say this loudly enough or strongly enough: The stakeholders affected should be included in this."
Holm said she understood the concerns, and preservationists can have their say as the proposal makes its way through the approval process.
Why the rush? Holm told the subcommittee the city was getting ready to celebrate its 190th birthday next year and needed something to add to its list of accomplishments. (What, Fattest City isn't good enough?)
Cahill said her group is still studying the proposed ordinance. "Hopefully, we'll find that it really does promote historic preservation and then, of course, we'll celebrate it with the rest of the city."
We don't see how there could possibly be any other outcome.
Get This Party Started
Hey, parents -- tired of kids' birthday parties with themes like Little Mermaid or Hello Kitty? Why not try the hot new theme making its way across Texas: the chicken pox party?
The idea is to find a kid infected with chicken pox and get him or her to spread it among the rest of the gang, giving them a mild dose of the virus as a way of inoculating them.
According to Mothering, The Magazine of Natural Family Living, you should ask your doctor to tip you off when one of his patients has chicken pox. Then it's party time!
The virus, the magazine says, "is easily communicated through saliva. Pass a whistle from the infected child to other children at the party." Sounds like fun.
For ten years now there's been a vaccine against chicken pox, but families holding these parties aren't trying to avoid paying for the shot, says Dr. Jan Drutz of Texas Children's Hospital. "Surprisingly, it happens among better-educated people, college-educated or beyond," he says. "There's a fear factor [about vaccinations] among younger people, in their twenties or thirties, who've never seen a highly contagious disease kill children."
These younger parents, he says, fear possible side effects of the shot. But taking "the natural route" to inoculation also presents problems, he says. If you're exposed to chicken pox, you open yourself up to secondary infections like the infamous flesh-eating bacteria, and as you get older, you'll lose some of your immunity and are more likely to develop conditions like shingles.
Forget that, though. We just want to know -- when you go to a chicken pox party, what's in the goodie bags?
The New Kid-Care is the organization created after the barrage of bad publicity that hit the old Kid-Care.
The old Kid-Care was started by Carol Porter, who began feeding hungry kids in her neighborhood and eventually garnered awards and great publicity for her efforts. Channel 13's Wayne Dolcefino ran a lengthy series of reports in 2003 claiming shoddy bookkeeping and misspending by Porter and the group. The state attorney general filed suit but later dropped the case.
Porter resigned from Kid-Care and has been protesting her innocence ever since, and relations between her and the new organization have been bitter. She says she's been barred from the Kid-Care property.
So Porter was a little surprised to see the newsletter The New Kid-Care sent out to Houstonians recently, which included things like "For 20 years, The New Kid-Care has provided in-home meal service to hungry children" and mentions of "recognition from over 40 organizations including three presidents of the United States."
There's talk of "the founders" of the group in the main story, but neither Porter nor her husband, Hurt, is named.
"I find it hypocritical, I find it sad, I find it unfair," Porter says. "If Carol and Hurt Porter were so horrible like they've been claiming, why use their accomplishments to claim for yourself?"
Tina Leningham, executive director for The New Kid-Care, says, "I don't feel like we're taking advantage of the work Carol Porter did. We're just trying to feed hungry children."