Top

film

Stories

 

300

It's Spartan hotties versus Persian trannies in Zack Snyder's far-too-faithful Frank Miller adaptation

Long ago there reigned a clan of Speedo-wearing militaristic psychopaths called the Spartans. They lived beneath a copper-colored sky, on a copper-colored land, amidst copper-colored fields, in copper-colored homes made from copper-colored stone. Legend has it they would outline their copper-colored pecs and abs with ash to enhance their manly buffness, and yet these were men of action and honor, not "philosophers and boy lovers" like their namby-pamby rivals the Athenians.

It's the Spartans' flesh the movie worships.
Courtesy of Warner Brothers Pictures
It's the Spartans' flesh the movie worships.

Lunatic machismo was cultivated early. From the age of seven, Spartan boys were trained in the art of humorlessness, and made to beat each other into submission. Little is known of the Spartan women, but scholars assume they were fierce.

Spartans were men of few words. They spoke in a language composed almost entirely of monosyllabic stupidities. In that strange time, among those strange people, a voice rang out perpetually from the heavens. No one knows who spoke it, but historians agree that this holy text was silly and repetitive and devoted by and large to what they now term "the totally butch awesomeness" of Spartan deed. History remembers their ethos: "Only the hard and strong may call himself Spartan. Only the hard. The strong." It remembers their war cry: "For honor's sake, for duty's sake, for glory's sake, we march. We march." And the immortal words of their fateful end: "We are undone! Undone, I tell you!"

Such magnificent verbiage was memorialized by Frank Miller, and incorporated into the text of 300, his graphic novel retelling of the Battle of Thermopylae, in which the titular quantity of Spartan studs fended off a billion gazillion Persian invaders. Marshaling the full resources of high-end computer imaging and the full capacities of hard-core fanboy nerditude, writer-director Zack Snyder (he of the unexpectedly decent Dawn of the Dead remake) has now brought Miller's book to "life."

Slathering pancake makeup on its actors and then pasting them into digital backgrounds, 300 takes the synthetic blockbuster one step closer to total animation; its bland, weightless monochromatics make Sin Citylook like the grungiest neorealism. It's a ponderous, plodding, visually dull picture, but the blame shouldn't be put on Snyder's skills per se, and has nothing to do with his ambition to blur the distinction between CGI and photography. Frankly, it's the slavish, frame-by-frame devotion to Miller's source material that's the problem. That explains both the risible screenplay and why the movie, for all its liberation from the real world, never takes full-winged flight into its own peculiar universe. Bogged down by respect for Miller's medium -- he's almost as faithful to 300 as Gus Van Sant was to Psycho-- Snyder seems to have forgotten that where comic-book panels indicate movement, movies can actually move.

The exception to the rule of inertia comes fitfully in certain action scenes, of which there are enough to satisfy the action-buff blood lust the film seeks to aggravate and sate. Here and there, Snyder makes good use of the lesson of The Matrix, slowing the slices, dices and decapitations to a digitally-calibrated crawl, the better to relish all 360 degrees of their stupendous ass-kickery. Tolerate the lobotomized dialogue and some half-assed political intrigues and you'll find a good ten minutes of 300 worth posting on YouTube. You can never go wrong with rampaging battle elephants. Throw in a war-rhino, some silver-masked ninja magicians and an eight-foot-tall god-king who looks like RuPaul beyond the Thunderdome (Rodrigo Santoro as Xerxes), and 300 is not without its treats.

Delicacies of dismemberment aside, 300 is notable for its outrageous sexual confusion. Here stand the Spartan king Leonidas (Gerard Butler) and his 299 buddies in nothing but leather man-panties and oiled torsos, clutching a variety of phalluses they seek to thrust in the bodies of their foes by trapping them in a small, rectum-like mountain passage called the "gates of hell(o!)" Yonder rises the Persian menace, led by the slinky, mascara'd Xerxes. When he's not flaring his nostrils at Leonidas and demanding he kneel down before his, uh, majesty, this flamboyantly pierced crypto-transsexual lounges on chinchilla throw pillows amidst a rump-shaking orgy of disfigured lesbians.

On first glance, the terms couldn't be clearer: macho white guys vs. effeminate Orientals. Yet aside from the fact that the Spartans come across as pinched, pinheaded gym bunnies, it's their flesh the movie worships. Not since Beau Travailhas a phalanx of meatheads received such insistent ogling. As for the threat to peace, freedom and democracy, that filthy Persian orgy looks way more fun than sitting around watching Spartans mope while their angry children slap each other around. At once homophobic and homoerotic, 300 is finally, and hilariously, just hysterical.

 
  • Christopher Lyerla 04/09/2007 4:44:00 AM

    Reading these comments and seeing the reaction from "300" theater-goers shows how out of touch some film critics are with the common people. Some left-leaning critics choose to recongnize the undeniable cinematic qualities of 300, then ignore or misconstrue the film's clear message and values (see this review that has the nerve to suggest the Spartans as insurgents and the Persians as American invaders!: http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Calendar/Film?Film=oid%3A452782) Other anti-West reviewers, like Mr. Lee and some comments here, just pretend that the movie is not the groundbreaking art that it is and denigrate the heroes' ideals by calling them "pedophile, slaver sadomasochists." The fact is, people like this film not just for the amazing effects and characters, but equally for the values it expresses. The Western ideal of civic freedom and never backing down to the enemies of that freedom couldn't be clearer in 300. These are ideals that have stirred our hearts for over 2500 years. Some reviewers can't stand this, because they adhere to the fashionable orthodoxy which hysterically attacks any art having the nerve to depict white people in a historically heroic light. Therefore any tyrant will always be the "most humane government of the day" as long as it's fighting against a Western army. Luckily most viewers don't buy this, and still recognize a glorious tale when they see one. One more thing: the homoerotic thing is a stretch, Mr. Lee. That metaphor with the spears is just ridiculous, and since when is showing respect for the male warrior physique necessarily homosexual?

  • CHRIS MONAHAN 03/20/2007 11:32:00 AM

    that is one funny laugh my SCHPARTAN CODPIECE WEARIN' ASS OFF at review! leave it to TEXAS the second greatest state after DELAWHERE!? where I can get pulled over while I drink and at the same time have a fully loaded gun rack in the window and a glock on my hip and stand on the side of the road while I ennunciate eloquently with HIghway patrol as I continue to drink my 24 ounce 10th can of the day STEEL RESERVE, courtesy of the burgermeister beirmeister of Ft. Worth , TEXAS! WEEE DOGGIES, but that is one fine hammerin' can of beer! late for the party? no problemo, slam a can of this JOE, and your all caught up with everyone else! not knockin' the beer as i am a serious afficionado of the liquid libation, so 2 thumbs up to STEEL RESERVE, and you best have RESERVE if you tangle with this cerveza. Ya'll ever see my brother there Ya'll say HI for me, Ya'll know him ,he is the misplaced, displaced, "dude rancher" from the FIRST STATE! and remember the definition of an armadillo is, "animal born dead on the road".

  • Digzy 03/15/2007 8:21:00 PM

    Well. Hard to bring anything new to the table about this movie. I just loved it. The violence was beatufully coreographed. The slow and stop motion of the battles gave it something a little extra, I thought. The CGI blood spatter was very cool. The extrapolations in the movie - Xerxes' height, the lepers, the war ogre with the Persians, the black wolf, kept the comic book novelty perfectly. I thought Gerard Butler's King Leonidas was a towering, steel-fisted powering, awesome warrior to behold in all of his blood-thirsted glory. Visually, this movie was the surreal spectacle I had hoped for. All in all, it perfectly satiated my gore-appetite and left me wanting to raise some of my own hell, if just to dine in.

  • S.O. 03/12/2007 1:29:00 AM

    >> "The movie makes the Persians, the most humane government of the day the bad guys" I'm sure if the Persians had made it through Thermopylae, their subsequent slaughter of Greeks would have been most humane. But hey, even if it wasn't humane can the slaughter of white people at the hands of dark people ever be wrong? That's like Disneyland for liberals.

  • Mary Swanson 03/10/2007 6:04:00 PM

    I'm so glad you didn't pursue a career as a historian, you apparently have absolutely no respect for the subject or the desire to know anything about it. Many of your criticisms of 300's absurdity are exactly what is known about the Spartans from classical writers like Herodotus. Next time, before you write a review of a movie about spartans, pick up a dictionary and look up the word "spartan". Then look up the word "laconic" which is derived from the spartan style of communication (Sparta being the city of Laconia the country). Do us all a favor, and look up "Battle of Thermopylae" or "Sparta" on Wikipedia and do a little reading (since I assume Plutarch isn't on your bookshelf) and THEN try to write a critique of a movie about 480BC Sparta. Peppered throughout what you call "lobotomized dialogue" are quotes directly from the classics, several of which (tonight we dine in hell, then we shall have to fight in the shade, etc.) are slogans and mottos of the modern greek army. This movie is not merely history, it is legend, and legend demands artistic interpretation. (Or would you go around criticising monuments for being too pretty and unrealistic as well?) But hey, if the classics aren't good enough for little old you....

  • Patrick Carroll 03/10/2007 2:41:00 AM

    Macho white guys vs. effeminate Orientals? Not a bit of it. The film takes a moral stance: there is an unapologetic difference between free citizens who fight to keep their freedom and imperial subjects who simply obey orders. The film doesn't take the standard postmodern tack and leave us wondering who are the good guys. The defending Spartans, while not perfect, are better than the invading Persians. It's a pity that unambiguously distinguishing good and bad, or right and wrong, provokes so much anger in out intelligentsia.

  • Shane 03/10/2007 1:56:00 AM

    First to the author of this pointless diatribe, you are an idiot. I think I've read some of your past reviews and I think each I've noticed the same thing. You don't actually watch the movies. In fact it appears that he only watches the trailers and even then still can't seem to write a decent honest review of a movie. Then to #1, you fit right in there with the reviewer. To #2, those are pretty good points. And finally to #3, you also fit right in there with the reviewer. If what you stated were true, then what would the point be to write a review? Anyone that can't see this movie for what it really is, is just a sad pathetic shell of human being. This movie is one of the best that has been released in a very long time. Just because you can't figure it out doesn't make you right. It was based on a comic book that was based on another movie based on actual events in history. Go do some research. I spent two days reading up on the history behind this story and found that other than character dialog it was very accurate. This is the second and I'm sure not the last bad review I will read on this. This movie blew every other that has been released, out of the water. Get with the program people. Get heads out of your rear ends.

  • Juba 03/09/2007 11:24:00 PM

    Great review. You're sure to have an army of oiled up, buff and sullen fanboys beating down your door any moment now, calling you out for being a commie-fag. What I find hilarious is that people who worship this turd of a movie always defend it by saying 'it's based on a comic book, lighten up, it's just entertainment!' If that's the case why do these same morons then whine endlessly when someone says their comic book movie sucks. Just a movie indeed....

  • Phocion 03/09/2007 8:35:00 PM

    Why is that those of the political left have such a hard time dealing with that which exonerates the West as compared to the East? Granted, this is a MOVIE that faithfully follows the story of a COMIC BOOK but the idea is still there and yet still when it is all fantasy the Left gets bent out of shape trying to do all they can to denounce the work. Both the critic and the commenter (Rathernotsay) seem to have a problem with the West winning. To characterize the Persians as the �most humane government of the day� demonstrates a lack of historical knowledge or simply the desire to rewrite history to fit a current political belief du jour that the East is better/nicer/more honorable than the West. The problem is that this lack of knowledge allows the like minded to rail ever on about Spanish conquistadors in the Americas and British Redcoats in Africa and Asia but completely ignores the Huns and Moors and Persians that tried and, thankfully, failed to subjugate the West. Lest they forget, Thermopylae wasn�t a battle of attacking Greeks versus defending Persians but rather the reverse. Perhaps if the �most humane government� had decided to stay on its side of the Bosporus it wouldn�t have been made out to be the oversimplified villain in a comic book movie.

  • RatherNotSay 03/09/2007 3:26:00 AM

    The movie makes the Persians, the most humane government of the day the bad guys and the Spartans, the pedophile, slaver sadomasochists the heroes. This is just another subliminal brainwash movie to get us ready for another war by daemonizing the Persians. Looks like the Greeks saw right through it. See what the real Greeks think about this historically inaccurate bigoted spin on their history: http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/03/08/arts/EU-A-E-MOV-Greece-300.php By ancient Persia, they refer to modern Iran whose soldiers are portrayed as bloodthirsty, underdeveloped zombies, he wrote. They are stroking racist instincts in Europe and America. Please don't subsidize bigotry.

 

Find A Film

for free stuff, film info & more!

Most Popular Stories

Find A Coupon

Popular Coupons

Box Office

  1. Chronicle (2012/ I), 22.0 mil, 22.0 mil
  2. The Woman in Black, 20.9 mil, 20.9 mil
  3. The Grey, 9.3 mil, 34.6 mil
  4. Big Miracle, 7.8 mil, 7.8 mil
  5. Underworld: Awakening, 5.5 mil, 54.2 mil
  6. One for the Money, 5.2 mil, 19.6 mil
  7. Red Tails, 4.7 mil, 41.1 mil
  8. The Descendants, 4.6 mil, 65.5 mil
  9. Man on a Ledge, 4.4 mil, 14.6 mil
  10. Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close, 3.8 mil, 26.7 mil
Movie Title, Weekly Earnings, Total Earnings

Trailers

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy