Mail Call

Royalty Rumble

Disappointed: As a musician and former resident of the Houston area — and as a devout reader of the Houston Press — I was really disappointed by the inaccuracies of John Nova Lomax's article on SoundExchange ["SoundExchange Wants to Kill Internet Radio," Racket, May 17]. The insinuation that SoundExchange has some ulterior motive in not finding artists owed royalty money so it can fatten its own bank account is patently absurd. The organization is not-for-profit, and any uncollected moneys are redistributed to other artists, thus effectively lowering administrative costs. By law, any money not claimed after three years is subject to forfeiture, but SoundExchange is still trying to pay artists whose recordings were played over a decade ago. Compare this to other performance-rights organizations both here in the U.S. and around the world, which will only pay for performances surveyed within the past year.

SoundExchange has engaged in extensive outreach efforts to try and find artists who are owed royalties, and we certainly appreciate John's offer to help find Houston-area performers. We urge all artists to come register with us at www.soundexchange.com. Registration is absolutely free.

Willem Dicke
SoundExchange
Washington, DC

The Truth about Tony?

Online readers respond to Steven Devadanam's HouStoned blog entry about theSopranos finale, "Tony Soprano Ain't Dead. Now Shaddup and Pass the Cold Cuts," June 13.

I think you're right: To expect a happy ending would be anti-David Chase. The ending made sense if you thought about it.

Adil, June 13

Being Tony: Essentially, we've been having a Being Tony Soprano experience for the last few years, and we all just got spit out on the side of the New Jersey Turnpike.

RB, June 13

You got it: The only interpretation that makes sense from the final scene is that life goes on for Tony (as Steve Perry sings, "oh the movie never ends, it goes on and on and on and on"). And life for Tony Soprano is about always looking over your shoulder while dealing with a dysfunctional family. That shady-looking guy at the counter, is he a hitter? That guy in the trucker hat, is he an FBI agent? It's all foreshadowing Tony's future, facing FBI indictment and constant danger as the head of an organized crime family. Like Tony tells Bobby B. on the lake, a boss ends up dead or in jail.

When the screen cut to black, it wasn't Tony getting whacked. It was the viewer.

MarkB, June 13

What really matters: The greatest repercussion of the Sopranos ending? Holstens Diner is going to have to add "onion rings" to their lunch menu...

franger, June 14

Tony is dead: If there is a movie, which I highly doubt, it will be about Tony's father.

Foreshadowing is poignant after the fact. Why show us the scene with Bobby at the lake? Twice? Once in the first episode of the season, the other in the second-to-last. Obviously, Chase believes it to be an important clue to Tony's demise.

I take Chase at his word, that he is not messing with us. He would not include that scene twice before the finale, if it had no meaning.

pistola, June 14

He's a survivor: Ya know, I thought the same thing — I thought that the action really began after we were plucked out of T's world. More importantly, T is a survivor always on the alert (he would never have just sat there and let all the signs/observations we were seeing through his perspective just roll by him). I was distracted by the reference to the "it all goes black / you never see it coming," but I'm glad everyone is finally remembering how we were introduced to T and removed from his world the same way.

Chris, June 15

Shrink wrap: Has anyone thought about how Dr. Melfi would feel if Tony ends up dead? Horrible — it would ruin her life. She would feel that she gave in to the elitist intellectuals at the dinner table who convinced her that therapy for a sociopath just doesn't work. She went with it (albeit with discomfit). Now just imagine her reaction when she reads about Tony's assassination. Her life work — saving people — is all for naught. She cut this man loose, and then he dies. Why else would Chase have Melfi end the relationship? It wouldn't have much impact if Tony lives. But, with Tony's death, Melfi spends the rest of her life much like Tony, grappling with her good and evil sides, questioning her intentions, trying to find where she fits in the world.

Aside from the immediate Soprano family witnessing Tony's death, she is the biggest victim of this final episode.

4score, June 19Upon Further Reflection

We triple-checked Dune-Micheli Patten's video, part of the "LU" exhibit at the Art Car Museum, and we found that contrary to our capsule review of the show [by Sean Carroll, May 31], the artist does not appear in blackface in the video.

The Houston Press regrets the error.

Water Break

School's out for summer, and the absence of pencils, books and teachers' dirty looks means the arrival of the sweltering Houston heat. We're big fans of keeping cool, so the theme for this month's high school photo contest is water. Fresh water, salt water, bath water, fish water — anything that's wet, really. Send all entries to studentphotos@houstonpress.com. Visit blogs.houstonpress.com for more details and to vote on last month's entries

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • James Partsch-Galvan 06/28/2007 8:33:00 PM

    Galvan wrote: City Council started its meeting 15 minutes late on Wednesday, the same day the Houston Chronicle reported that the panel hasn't been on time in more than three years. Some members say the delays are natural for all deliberative bodies, which require some back room negotiation to smooth the legislative process. Mayor Bill White and Houston City Council Members do not give a f.uck! They were elected to do a job and be at work on time. This is what we Houstonians get for allowing a crook and carpetbagger like Bill White to get controll of our local government. These members who say the delasy are natural have no business being on the Houston City Council. Every single one of those political prostitutes should be voted out of office in November 2007 including the newest political prostitute on the panel. I didn't vote for her, and I will not vote for her for a full 2 year term come November. She has proven that she is just as corrupt as the rest of them! The time has come to galvanize and throw the bums out in 2007, 2008. James Partsch-Galvan www.galvan.org

  • Fred Wilhelms 06/27/2007 6:29:00 PM

    Mr. Dicke is not telling the truth when he says "The organization is not-for-profit, and any uncollected moneys are redistributed to other artists, thus effectively lowering administrative costs." The fact that an organization is not-for-profit is irrelevant to the discussion. A not-for-profit organization can spend available money just as well as a for-profit. The forfeited money goes into SoundExchange's general accounts and is used to defray operational expenses. SoundExchange has never released any detailed information regarding those expenses, so it is impossible to say how much gets back into the royalty pool. One thing you can count on, if you run into Mr. Dicke at a music conference and he offers to buy you a drink,you can thank people like Eddie Floyd and Earl "Fatha" Hines who are actually paying for it. We might be able to chalk up that stuff about lowering administrative costs to some semantic haziness on Mr. Dicke's part, although he is a paid spokesman for SoundExchange and should know how to be more precise. But Mr. Dicke completely misrepresents what happens with the money that is available for redistribution through the royalty pool, and although I suspect he isn't (because he's done this before), he should be ashamed at his disregard of the facts. That money doesn't just get "redistributed to other artists." The royalty pool, by law, is split between copyright holders (the labels) and the recording artists. 50% of the pool goes to the labels. Despite Mr. Dicke's misrepresentation, half the money that is forfeited from the artist accounts goes, not to other artists, but the labels. In other words, SoundExchange gets to play Robin Hood In Reverse. Half the money from forfeited artist accounts that doesn't get swallowed up paying for SoundExchange bar tabs at music conferences gets redistributed to the labels. Since SoundExchange has admitted that 70% of the label share goes to the labels represented by the RIAA, that means that thirty-five cents of every forfeited artist dollar goes to the four major labels. For SoundExchange, nothing succeeds like failure. The fact remains that, seven years after it started, it still hasn't found one in three artists who it has collected money for. Instead of using his time to locate some of those artists, Mr. Dicke would rather continue to misrepresent the facts in public. SoundExchange would rather rake the time to distort the truth than do the job it promised to do. All by itself, that's a pretty good indication of how poor SoundExchange's priorities are.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy