Top

music

Stories

 

Tired of the Hype, But That's All There Is

Next month, Houston gets to be a cool kid. But only for a week.

Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;

Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,

The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and

everywhere

The ceremony of innocence is drowned;

The best lack all conviction, while the

worst

Are full of passionate intensity.

William Butler Yeats was not writing about today's music industry when he penned those immortal lines in the aftermath of the Great War, but he could have been. Quite simply, the biz is a thing that has fallen apart, and the center no ­longer exists.

Where once there was order — bands built followings in local scenes, got signed, made it on the radio by hook or by crook, toured hard and, with luck, made it to the top — there is now, what exactly?

Blog bedlam. An echo chamber of the ill-informed. Innocence drowned in perpetually raging rapids of flavor-of-the-week whitewater that too often leaves little but sneering cynicism in its wake. Small wonder that so many of the best have lost their fervor; too often, the best bands are ignored, and the most ardent fans have been deceived ten times too many.

And even as I type, the floodgates creak open for another mighty tide of propaganda. The rumble-buzz from the bee-loud hive mind is already rattling the teacups in our cupboards. Everybody! South By Southwest season is at hand: Clap your hands and say hype!

Which band of scruffy suburban liberal arts majors with yelpy voices and guitars (angular, of course) will be this month's perpetual savior of rock and roll? Which duo of face-painted Warhol toadies will fill dance floors as never before with their delightfully decadent disco/funk-infused electro-pop? (Answers: Vampire Weekend and MGMT, respectively.)

How many of these acts will we still be listening to two, three, five months hence? For every legit quality band like Arctic Monkeys or Arcade Fire, there are three moldy headstones for forgotten groups like the Datsuns, White Whale, Bound Stems, Tapes 'N Tapes and Wolf Parade. They were born to be hyped and hyped to die.

In a piece in last year's Oxford American music issue, essayist Bill Wasik (the flash-mob inventing swami of all phenomena hipster and viral) nailed it. He quoted a blogger, in a hurry to scoop Pitchfork's review of a now-forgotten 2006 blog band called Annuals, thusly: "Get ready to get sick of hearing about this band."

Such is life in an era in which music is increasingly less about actual sounds than it is about being in the inner sanctum of Those Who Heard Them Before You. Granted, it has ever been such — going back to the 1960s in music (and before that in other arts) — every once-­underground, later-ubiquitous entity has its "I liked them before they sold out" contingent. But the Internet and the attendant utter diminishment of recorded music's monetary value have exacerbated this exponentially. Through time-stamped blogs, it is now possible to prove that you were there first. And now that all recorded music is free to everyone, its only real worth is as a fashion ­accessory.

Or maybe it is more like addiction. Wasik also interviewed John Richards, one of the most prominent DJs on Seattle radio/Internet indie rock behemoth KEXP. Richards likened himself to a cred junkie. "A big deal with us is discovery," he said. "And you're discovering not just a song; you're discovering a band. When you're just discovering a second album, there's not as much hype involved."

Richards's example was the Pixies' Surfer Rosa, which he said changed his life. But then every subsequent Pixies failed to deliver the same euphoria. "You take the drug, you never get that high again, you know?" he said, echoing the forever everywhere coalition of speed freaks, crackheads and junkies.

For any given band, the high only lasts for one album, one tour stop in each town. This can be a retroactive process. Let's say you were at a Wolf Parade show in early 2005. You were neither impressed nor turned off by the band — you just stood there, occasionally nipping off a Lone Star. But then months later, Pitchfork gives the band's record a 9.2. You hear that, I dunno, Brian Eno or John Cale has sung their praises. Suddenly that humdrum night is transformed in your memory into a magical evening.

So you go to the same band's next show, and everything is all wrong. Richards spoke to Wasik about how it went for him with Clap Your Hands Say Yeah.

"But the second [show]," he said, "well, now it sold out early, and it's at a bigger club. And I'm not that guy anymore. I'm not the guy discovering them. I'm just a guy who is with everybody else who also knows who they are." [Italics original.]

Sheez, all this is starting to remind me of baseball card collecting. Pre-1981, it was exciting. You set enough of your allowance aside to buy a few packs of Topps, hoping that one of them would have that rookie card of Rickey Henderson or Fernando Valenzuela in it. You wanted to be that guy, you see, the one who was there before everyone else.

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Cecily 02/16/2008 1:53:00 PM

    I'm quite sure you'll have a few members of the Houston hipster circle jerk slither through here and defend "pitchfork: the gathering"

  • Ramon "lp4" Medina 02/16/2008 4:32:00 AM

    I think there is something very natural about the thrill "discovering" a band. It's about hearing that unique voice for the first time and there is a natural thrill in that. There are two reason's why by the time a second album, book, or whatever you experience naturally will have a diminished return. The first is that the initial thrill is gone and it's now part of your landscape whereas before it was not there. I don't see that as anything particularly cynical but natural. The second reason using the Pixies example you cite is that follow up the records really weren't as good as Surfer Rosa. That's true for many bands. Take Television for example, they had one goddamn great album in them and the second album just didn't have that same spark but it wasn't because of cynical hipsters - it just really wasn't that great. Hell, a friend of mine just discovered the Dimes (err I mean Young Mammals) and for me it's really thrilling to see her experience them as i did years ago. It's not that I don't like them any less but the unexpected is largely gone. What they do is singular and impressive but I now know what they can do while for her it's all new. Does that make me a cynical hipster because I can say to her "hey check out this blog i wrote about them back in 1996!"? I don't think so. For me, it's not I beat you to the punch but "wow, I know what you are experiencing in just discovering this band and that's so cool." In short I think yr making a mountain out of a hipster molehill. Oh and can John henry please review the next U2 album? That kid is all right!

  • David 02/13/2008 7:11:00 PM

    "We are the fat kid at the prom of cool cities." Classic.

 

Most Popular Stories

Find a Concert

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy