Donor Babies Search for Their Anonymous Fathers

All grown up, some children of sperm donors are trying to break through the secrecy that keeps them from knowing their family history

On the morning of May 4, 1981, Nancy LaBounty was ready to conceive a child.

Kathleen LaBounty believes anonymous sperm donation should be banned.
Daniel Kramer
Kathleen LaBounty believes anonymous sperm donation should be banned.
Wendy Kramer created the Donor Sibling Registry in 2000.
Mark Manger
Wendy Kramer created the Donor Sibling Registry in 2000.

She went to the Baylor College of Medicine infertility clinic, located in what is now St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, and rode the elevator to the 22nd floor. As she waited in the clinic lobby, a receptionist picked up the phone and called the father-to-be. The details of the conversation are not known, but the purpose of the call was simple: The patient is here. Bring your semen sample.

He would've entered through the clinic's back door, handed off the cup and disappeared. He was probably a Baylor medical student, as the clinic collected most of the samples from students in need of pocket money.

Nancy had requested a guy with blond hair, but this was pretty much on an as-is basis. Fifty bucks a month, and you got a crack at motherhood. Her husband was infertile, and instead of adopting, she wanted a child who was biologically hers. Nancy had actually had one baby — a boy — this way, just over a year previous. He was born with Down syndrome. She put him up for adoption.

Nine months later, Nancy gave birth to Kathleen Ruby LaBounty, a healthy girl. Twenty-five years later, Kathleen would start her search for the young medical student who walked out of the clinic's door that day. The way she describes it today, it's just as much a search for herself. She feels like she was robbed of half her family, half her medical history, half her identity. It's a feeling shared by many other donor-conceived children who are now in their late teens and twenties. They say that no one anticipated — or even considered — how these children might feel when they reached adulthood. They're calling for the United States to follow in the footsteps of the UK, Australia, Sweden and others and abolish anonymous donation.

"I just think it's a transferring of loss," Kathleen says today. "The parents are pursuing this, and by going through anonymous donation, they get their dream of parenthood. But then that loss is just transferred to us. And it's so preventable — it doesn't need to happen."

Or maybe this is more to the point: "I look in the mirror," she says, "and I don't know whose face is reflected back."
_____________________

The faces stare out of the yearbooks with stone stares and goofy grins; most are victims of horrible late-'70s, early-'80s hair and couture.

Big glasses, shaggy or feathered hair, wide ties, collars that look like they could flap away into the sky. One of these guys might be Kathleen's biological dad.

In 2006, she went to Baylor's med school library and pored over yearbooks from 1979 to 1984. In the beginning, she was naive enough to think he'd jump right out. She paid close attention to eyes and smiles. She photocopied the pages and asked friends to flip through them and star the best ­candidates.

But before she knew it, she had come up with a list of 600 candidates whom she alphabetized and stuck into binders. She Googled them and checked them out on Docfinder.com, and when she had their addresses or e-mails, she sent them an inquiry saying, hey, this is going to sound strange, but I'm trying to find out if you're my biological father. If you ever donated sperm to Baylor, would you be willing to take a DNA test? She included pictures of herself: just under one year old; eight years old with a mustache from leftover Halloween makeup; in a black gown before a college formal; present day.

The 250 replies were overwhelmingly good-natured — from donors and non-donors alike.

"Wow. Your letter was unexpected, but very exciting and very welcome...I am completely open to exploring the possibility of me being your birth father."

"Sorry to say that I am not the lucky person who is your genetic dad, as I did not donate sperm...I hope your search is successful, and that your genetic father has the same kind face and warm smile as you do."

"Judging from your pictures, your father would, I'm sure, be proud....However, that man would not be me. Actually, I would be excited if it was..."

Kathleen narrowed the pool of 40 candidates willing to be tested down to 14, many of whom insisted on covering the cost. (New to the process, she started off with legally binding DNA testing, which cost $600-$900. She then discovered nonbinding tests were only $99.)

This tenacity, and this need to connect with other people, was nothing new to Kathleen. At age seven, in the midst of a career rescuing wounded baby birds, she became a vegetarian. She says she hasn't slipped once. In high school, she did volunteer work with kids with Down syndrome — a way for her to connect with her unknown half-brother. At Houston Baptist University, she majored in psychology and sociology, and is now finishing a master's degree in psychology.

As interesting as this experience has been for her so far, Kathleen hates the fact that she has to look through old yearbooks to find her biological father.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next Page >>
 
  • WakeUp 05/21/2011 5:10:00 AM

    what about the kids that grew up knowing their dads (parents divorced) and did not want to communicate with their "so-called" dads later in life and did not grow up with their dads and did not spend time with their dads. A lot of people turn out just fine without their so-called dads. You don't need a father to make you complete, only love and realization that you are special.

  • Susan C 03/05/2011 7:56:00 PM

    This is for Ricky written 3 months ago. I get that you are angry with the woman who gave up her Down's syndrome baby but who are you to judge her? There are people who are incapable of dealing with this and she was smart enough to realize she was one of them. She did the brave thing by letting him go to parents who will love him unconditionally and give him the life he needs. Thank God she realized it before she took him and got into trouble with him. My uncle is an FBI agent and he tells me the cases that haunts him the most are the children abused by parents or relatives. His most tragic case is of a young girl who gave birth to a baby when she was fourteen and she told her family she did not want to be around the baby. Her parents insisted she keep the child and they would help her and sue the boy's parents for support. Over the many months she could not bear to look at the child but she had to be a parent to him. One day when everyone was at work she suffocated the baby, called the police and told them to come and take the bastard out of her room. My uncle said she showed no remorse or wanted to attend the funeral. She was sent to juvenile until she turned 21 when she was released. When he asked the parents why they did not listen to the girl and give the baby up, the father said children belong to their real families regardless of the circumstances. He said mothers have to be with their children and that is all there is to that. He also said we need to force people to accept responsibility or knock some sense into their heads. The girl left juvenile, got married and had more kids and according to my uncle has never once mentioned the child, no one knows about the baby and she has no contact with her family at all. We need to think of the best interest of the child first.

  • Covecrescent 01/07/2011 10:40:00 PM

    Since the beginning of mankind women have passed of children as the progeny of their partners even when obviously not. In Judaism, children are what the mother is, and you are referred to under your mothers name in prayers and blessing invocations because you always know who you mother is but a father is never certain.

  • Ricky 11/12/2010 2:43:00 AM

    I don't know how the rest of you feel about this, but for this woman to give up her child just because he was born with Down's Syndrome, I think that her giving him up for adoption is so cruel and just plain mean! People with Downs Syndrome are probably the most loveable, loyal, sympathetic people in this world. My Aunt had TWIN Downs Syndrome boys in 1972 and those boys were so loveable and had so much love to give. Just because people hear " Downs syndrome" they think "retarded " and they think of the hardships of raising a DS baby and they are so WRONG. There are hardships in raising ANY child. My DS cousins, may they rest in peace, were so much fun to be around and they BOTH went to and graduated school and high school. One of them, Donny was born with a hole in his heart and had health issues the majority of his 17 years, but that didn't make him " difficult" to live with and Bobby passed when he was 27 years old, and there was no autopsy but we think he died from a heart attack. He was a heavy man and one day, one HOT day in Southern Indiana he worked at SIRS ( Southern Indiana Rehabilitation Services ) and he worked in a building like an airport hanger, and it was 98 degrees outside and I can only imagine inside it was probably close to 115+ degrees and I am making a LOW guess, I would bet it was a lot hotter in there, and there was NO air conditioning in the place he worked at, all they had were the openings in the building at both ends and they had ceiling fans, 30+ feet up hanging from the ceiling...big deal. As with every day when he would come home from work, he would grab a soda out of the fridge, watch some TV while he was " rehydrating " himself and then he would go jump in their swimming pool. Well since it was so hot that day, the Dr's think that when he jumped into the pool, which the pool water was almost like bath water, because it had been so hot outside, and with him being " over-heated" from working 8 hours practically ooutside in the heat, and when he jumped into the pool it probably shocked his system and his heart just stopped. His mother, my aunt was riding around on the lawnmower cutting the grass and she had seen him floating in the pool, face down, and she jumped off the lawnmower and she was a heavy woman also, and she got into the pool and she tried to get him to the ladder and was trying to give him CPR and trying to keep him up and out of the water while literally screaming for HELP, and her nearest neighbor was 5 miles down the road and she didn't want to leave him in the pool just to run into the house to grab the telephone, she thought that if she kept giving him CPR it would work so stopping to go into the house to get the phone was not an option. Luckily someone in a truck was passing by on the road and heard her screaming for help and he stopped and seen what was wrong and used his CB and called for help and they both got him out of the pool and continued to give him CPR but he most likely died in the pool because he was flat-lined in the ambulance when the ambulance finally showed up ( 45 minutes from town ). He led a wonderful life and they will BOTH be missed, but just because they were Downs Syndrome, when they were born the Dr's ( at that time...early 70's ) they suggested to my aunt and uncle that they put them both into a group home and my uncle said "Hell NO !!!" We will take them home and we will pet them if that's what it will take but they are coming home with us and they will learn to read and go to school and live as normal a childhood as God will let them...and they did ! My aunt was named Mother of the Year in 1986 for her work with Special Olympics, which my DS cousins participated in and won many 1st and 2nd place ribbons and trophies in swimming and basketball and bowling. When Special Olympics were not going on they always kept busy swimming indoors at the school in the winter and also they were on Bowling teams. That woman who gave her son up because he was Downs Syndrome will NEVER know the meaning of TRUE LOVE from raising a Downs Syndrome baby up into their adulthood. There is a misconception that DS people all die a young age and some do, but my cousins passed when one was 17 and the other was 27 and they were friends with 30-40 and 50 year old DS people. I'm not saying that ANY parent will never experience TRUE LOVE from raising their normal, healthy born child ( children), it's just that Downs Syndrome babies and young DS men/women and grown DS men and women are just so innocent and loving and they stay that way all their lives. My cousins NEVER got into fights with their parents or their other brothers and sisters. They never got into any fights with anyone. They were born innocent and stayed that way even when they were in school and being teased and picked on. They were taught to not listen to what other kids had to say about them and to ignore those kids because those kids who would tease them and call them names are the ones that have the real problems. I'm sorry, when I read about that woman who gave her son up for adoption because of the fact he was Downs Syndrome, it hit a nerve with me and I just had to voice my opinion about this. Thanks for reading and I hope that whoever reads this will understand what I wrote. Have a nice weekend !!! Ricky

  • Elisabeth 08/16/2010 11:26:00 PM

    I am a single woman in her 30's who has always wanted children but who has decided not to have any unless I do get married to someone I love someday. (I simply have not found him up to now.) When people hear how much I would love to be a mother, they often ask why I don't go for artificial insemination, saying that they think I would be a wonderful mother. Regardless of what sort of mother I would be, I agree with many posters here that to intentionally create a child to know only one of his/her parents would be a selfish thing to do. I am really grateful for this article because it gives a voice to some concerns I have had for a while that no one else seems to understand. To hear donor-conceived children echoing the same concerns I have thought about really reinforces my decision not to go to a sperm bank to have children. I just want to say , "Thanks" for this article and for the thoughts of the donor-conceived who have misgivings about donor conception. It just reinforces what I was already thinking.

  • Rachel 08/15/2010 1:33:00 AM

    I responded to an ad for egg donation mainly due to financial hardship. I was 23 and not in a long term relationship. It was not easy with all the injections one has to take along with the grueling screening process. For my hardship I received seven thousand dollars which I used to pay off my bills. I did it two more times and I can honestly say I don't have any real urge to meet the children born. I was only a supplier for a couple in a loving relationship and not able to concieve. Maybe that is why most kids born this way are only seeking the sperm donor. However if somene did contact me I would give medical info and nothing more. There is no longing or need on my part and I would be surprised if there were any on the kids part too.

  • Samuel P. Toney 03/08/2009 11:15:00 PM

    Call me cynical, but this person knows full well that the "dad" and "family" she seeks is probably well off now. Yes, we forget that the sperm donor is now a doctor well into his prime earning years. And I must say she is not without some selfishness herself. What if she were to discover that she half siblings? Are they supposed to know treat her as a sister? I find it more than ironic that these people who have touching stories, talk about the "damage" they have suffered yet don't give much consideration to lives of the family they insist on insinuating themselves into. While we may debate the ethics of what the sperm donor did, the wife and kids are innocent parties. Their lives are going to be changed as a consequence. Who is speaking on their behalf? Do those who are seeking out sperm donors care? There seems an assumption that there is a stable loving family out there missing this great person and a union needs to take place. There are legal reasons for anonymity.And what if by tragic circumstance, the sperm donor is dead? Does this woman want some of the estate? Should she be entitled to any part of the estate? Lastly, I don't feel much pity for these kids who had loving, caring, and nurturing homes. If they were given such homes then they should be thankful and grateful. I reserve my pity for the unadopted kids. We tell people don't abort, put the kid up for adoption, yet we know that it is kids of a certain race and a particular age range that are most likely to be adopted. So it is by this "humane" policy that we doom kids to a life of rootlessness and then sit back and applaud. These kids don't know their families either and they have horrible home lives in the underfunded orphanages. Let's save the pity for kids who don't have a loving, caring, nurturing home. Shame on those kids who got such a home for now saying they were somehow "deprived". They need to go into poor neighborhoods and find out what deprivation really is. Talk to those kids, then coming back and tell us how you now realize what you loss. Sheesh!

  • Samuel P. Toney 03/08/2009 11:13:00 PM

    Call me cynical, but this person knows full well that the "dad" and "family" she seeks is probably well off now. Yes, we forget that the sperm donor is now a doctor well into his prime earning years. And I must say she is not without some selfishness herself. What if she were to discover that she half siblings? Are they supposed to know treat her as a sister? I find it more than ironic that these people who have touching stories, talk about the "damage" they have suffered yet don't give much consideration to lives of the family they insist on insinuating themselves into. While we may debate the ethics of what the sperm donor did, the wife and kids are innocent parties. Their lives are going to be changed as a consequence. Who is speaking on their behalf? Do those who are seeking out sperm donors care? There seems an assumption that there is a stable loving family out there missing this great person and a union needs to take place. There are legal reasons for anonymity.And what if by tragic circumstance, the sperm donor is dead? Does this woman want some of the estate? Should she be entitled to any part of the estate? Lastly, I don't feel much pity for these kids who had loving, caring, and nurturing homes. If they were given such homes then they should be thankful and grateful. I reserve my pity for the unadopted kids. We tell people don't abort, put the kid up for adoption, yet we know that it is kids of a certain race and a particular age range that are most likely to be adopted. So it is by this "humane" policy that we doom kids to a life of rootlessness and then sit back and applaud. These kids don't know their families either and they have horrible home lives in the underfunded orphanages. Let's save the pity for kids who don't have a loving, caring, nurturing home. Shame on those kids who got such a home for now saying they were somehow "deprived". They need to go into poor neighborhoods and find out what deprivation really is. Talk to those kids, then coming back and tell us how you now realize what you loss. Sheesh!

  • Gee 12/12/2008 6:40:00 PM

    Nasty.

  • Angela 11/11/2008 10:56:00 AM

    I AM TERRIFIED OF INCEST AND INTER - BREEDING HAZARDS BEING ENSHRINED IN LAW - SORRY TO BE SO VOCAL BUT why oh why is the law, which will be a statute for a long long time not taking precautions aginst this accident which is waiting to happen? All us donor-concoived have a right to be heard, because donating gametes (what a twee euphemism for human beings!) is about us. I don't want to have a physically deformed child, thanks. We are experiencing all kinds of problems, so please listen up.

  • Anse 11/10/2008 8:23:00 PM

    What if you were conceived with donor sperm, grew up, then dated a sibling without knowing it??!!! Do you just go for it and hope for the best? I see they scatter these samples all over the country...seems like they're acting more on faith than anything else. Seriously, wouldn't you like to have some background knowledge? Isn't there a health issue to consider here? What if your secret donor father has a history of medical illness, and you don't know about it?

  • angela 11/08/2008 6:06:00 PM

    I am donor-conceived, and I am fed up with adults needing to experience nine months gestation and jutifying it anyway they can, or not, depending on who says whatever rhetoric they can think of on-line. What a terrifying metaphor for the quasi-nannying (you are not our parents!)to come. I think way that no adult involved thinks in terms of self-sacrifice, the way a poor family give the best food to the little ones and go with out themsleves, but just buy - yes buy - that nine months gestation experience, risking much sheer pain for the children involved, instead of anticipating that sheer self-scrifice, is not very nice at all really. Why buy nine months gestation when there are orphans in the world to love whose parents may be very unwell, or even dead, or something? And why even risk having an unhappy kid?

  • Stella 11/08/2008 5:47:00 PM

    Fascinated to read that "not all donor-conceivd have identity issues." Not all adults want to hi-jack other's lives to experience nine months gestation either, but nobody skews the conversation against them! It may be Kleenex time, but please see the link > http://needing-fathers.blogspot.com

  • donorconceived 11/08/2008 3:47:00 AM

    Steve said: "A guy jerked off in a cup and got paid for it." "jerking off" is just a natural biological function. There is no shame in it. Steve said: "His sperm was then used to impregnate a women (for whatever the reason and circumstances)." Our bio/genetic father's knew that they were giving their seed to make a child. If they didn't realize this then that is not only their fault (personal responsibility to inform ourselves) but the banks fault in not fully informing them as to how their sperm would be used and the potential emotional/psychological repercussions. There really is no such thing as total anonymity these days (with DNA testing and the internet). Steve said: "The donor was paid for his sperm, not to be parent, then or later in life." The 'donor' should not EVER be motivated by money. In this case the carrot "money" being dangled in front of them is manipulating their informed consent. If a person is motivated by ego/insecurity/money then informed consent, even with counseling, is seriously questionable. Steve said: "There was no emotional connection between the mother and the donor. They didn't date. They didn't have a one night stand and never see each again. There is no lost love crying out for a romantic ending." Again, this boils down to informed consent. This procedure has NOTHING to do with the relationship or lack of between the mother and father. It is about creating a child -- together. Steve said: "What exactly does she want from this man if she does find him? They are complete strangers. There is no emotional tie (although, she appears to have created on)." No, there are no emotional ties but there should be. I absolutely believe that these men who 'donate/sell' their sperm are really, really good, worthy, people who, just as anyone else, can be persuaded to do things that they don't fully understand. They make mistakes, feel fear, pain, sadness, shame, love, joy, pride just as anyone else. We should start off by assuming that 'donors' are not people who a 'donor conceived' person should be ashamed of to acknowledge as their (genetic) father just as we (the 'donor' conceived) are not people who they should be ashamed of to be acknowledged as their (genetic) children, we all are worthy of love, why hide from each other? If a 'donor' or a recipient parent/family feel the need to hide then they really should not be participating in this method of conception. There is no shame in the biological function of masturbation. There is no shame in giving sperm to fertilize an egg to create an new life. But there is shame in secrets and anonymity. Spawned by greed/selfishness and complete and total non regulation of the industry (leading to eugentics/de-humanization/commodification of life etc.). And that is the root of the problem. Steve said: "They share DNA, which links them genetically, but certainly does not make them "family"." Again, that is not for you to decide. I would tend to disagree. Although I acknowledge that not all would agree with me. That will vary with each situation but it is very dangerous to make blanket statements like that. But the crux of the argument against anonymity is that institutions/businesses/professionals have no place in withholding information which the product of the transaction might feel is extremely personal and important to them. This is discriminating and a violation of our human dignity/rights. This requires government intervention. And David, you are not illegitimate. There is no such thing as illegitimate children/people. Unless your bio/genetic father would somehow pose a threat to you, your mother absolutely should not withhold this very personal/identity information from you. Especially now that you are an adult (I'm assuming that you are older than 18). Unfortunately, there are no laws to enforce that. She didn't go through an institution/business or professional who are withholding your personal/identity information from you. If she did then you might have a legal case (if you are willing to go through the exposure and all the gory fallout from insensitive people that would ultimately go with it � although I am sure that one day soon there will be a strong enough person to do that here in the US) That doesn't mean that ethically you do not have a very valid reason to know. Everyone should have the right to know, even if we don't like what we find in the end.

  • donorconceived 11/08/2008 3:06:00 AM

    Steve said: "A guy jerked off in a cup and got paid for it." "jerking off" is just a natural biological function. There is no shame in it. Steve said: "His sperm was then used to impregnate a women (for whatever the reason and circumstances)." Our bio/genetic father's knew that they were giving their seed to make a child. If they didn't realize this then that is not only their fault (personal responsibility to inform ourselves) but the banks fault in not fully informing them as to how their sperm would be used and the potential emotional/psychological repercussions. There really is no such thing as total anonymity these days (with DNA testing and the internet). Steve said: "The donor was paid for his sperm, not to be parent, then or later in life." The 'donor' should not EVER be motivated by money. In this case the carrot "money" being dangled in front of them is manipulating their informed consent. If a person is motivated by ego/insecurity/money then informed consent, even with counseling, is seriously questionable. Steve said: "There was no emotional connection between the mother and the donor. They didn't date. They didn't have a one night stand and never see each again. There is no lost love crying out for a romantic ending." Again, this boils down to informed consent. This procedure has NOTHING to do with the relationship or lack of between the mother and father. It is about creating a child -- together. Steve said: "What exactly does she want from this man if she does find him? They are complete strangers. There is no emotional tie (although, she appears to have created on)." No, there are no emotional ties but there should be. I absolutely believe that these men who 'donate/sell' their sperm are really, really good, worthy, people who, just as anyone else, can be persuaded to do things that they don't fully understand. They make mistakes, feel fear, pain, sadness, shame, love, joy, pride just as anyone else. We should start off by assuming that 'donors' are not people who a 'donor conceived' person should be ashamed of to acknowledge as their (genetic) father just as we (the 'donor' conceived) are not people who they should be ashamed of to be acknowledged as their (genetic) children, we all are worthy of love, why hide from each other? If a 'donor' or a recipient parent/family feel the need to hide then they really should not be participating in this method of conception. There is no shame in the biological function of masturbation. There is no shame in giving sperm to fertilize an egg to create an new life. But there is shame in secrets and anonymity. Spawned by greed/selfishness and complete and total non regulation of the industry (leading to eugentics/de-humanization/commodification of life etc.). And that is the root of the problem. Steve said: "They share DNA, which links them genetically, but certainly does not make them "family"." Again, that is not for you to decide. I would tend to disagree. Although I acknowledge that not all would agree with me. That will vary with each situation but it is very dangerous to make blanket statements like that. But the crux of the argument against anonymity is that institutions/businesses/professionals have no place in withholding information which the product of the transaction might feel is extremely personal and important to them. This is discriminating and a violation of our human dignity/rights. This requires government intervention. And David, you are not illegitimate. There is no such thing as illegitimate children/people. Unless your bio/genetic father would somehow pose a threat to you, your mother absolutely should not withhold this very personal/identity information from you. Especially now that you are an adult (I'm assuming that you are older than 18). Unfortunately, there are no laws to enforce that. She didn't go through an institution/business or professional who are withholding your personal/identity information from you. If she did then you might have a legal case (if you are willing to go through the exposure and all the gory fallout from insensitive people that would ultimately go with it � although I am sure that one day soon there will be a strong enough person to do that here in the US) That doesn't mean that ethically you do not have a very valid reason to know. Everyone should have the right to know, even if we don't like what we find in the end.

  • David 11/07/2008 8:45:00 PM

    Hah. If you think being the child of anonymous donation is bad, try being an illegitimate one where your mother refuses to tell you who your father is! Zero recourse. You could find egg donors online who charged more than $10k until those guidelines came out.

  • Steve 11/07/2008 5:54:00 PM

    A guy jerked off in a cup and got paid for it. His sperm was then used to impregnant a women (for whatever the reason and circumstances). The donor was paid for his sperm, not to be parent, then or later in life. There was no emotional connection between the mother and the donor. They didn't date. They didn't have a one night stand and never see each again. There is no lost love crying out for a romantic ending. What exactly does she want from this man if she does find him? They are complete strangers. There is no emotional tie (although, she appears to have created on). They share DNA, which links them genetically, but certainly does not make them "family".

  • Kathleen 11/07/2008 3:30:00 PM

    Allison, I do not believe that planned pregnancy is selfish. This is different than advocating for the ending of anonymity, which I do to ensure that the produced children have options available for their own well-being. I also have never thought that all donor-conceived children/adults will share my feelings. Like adoptees, some of us have no interest in searcing or finding out more, others have a moderate interest, while others will go to great efforts to get answers. We all must make whatever is the right and personal decision for us.

  • donor conceived adult 11/07/2008 4:30:00 AM

    as a donor conceived adult, i agree with kathleen, damian and the other donor conceived poster. i think donor anonymity should be against the law and i think donor conceived adults should have access to all records pertaining to their conception/biological origin. it is an outrage that we are deprived of information that belongs to us above any other.

  • Maira 11/07/2008 3:57:00 AM

    I have to agree with Kathleen & Damien. I don't think any of us are saying that donor insemination is wrong - it's the anonymous part that upsets us. I look at my daughter and think I want to give her the world, but how can I, when I can tell her where we come from? I don't think any parent who chose this route thought at the outset "this will harm my child but I don't care." I think it was more thoughtlessness on their part and greed on the part of the industry. They desperately wanted that little baby but nobody bothered to tell these desperate people the affect this will have on their kids. Nobody bothered to point out they were denying that little baby what they've always had and taken for granted - a complete history and family tree. And to all those parents who think that this is other people's kids - I have never told my mother how I feel about her choice. I could be your kid resenting the heck out of you for making a bad choice.

  • Donorconceived 11/07/2008 2:55:00 AM

    Like Damien, I am also a donor conceived person who didn't feel comfortable or realize the conundrum of my conception until after I became a mother. Having children of my own has put an entirely different spin on the repercussions of method of my conception. It's not about me anymore. This effects my children and their children as well. Only after seeing this from their perspective did I realize that all those suppressed, "I don't have a right to complain, I should just be grateful" were suppressing, dysfunctional, inhibited, flawed and invalidating. Not just for us but for our entire society and culture. I am not a religious person (at all) nor do I belong to any political party (I am an independent) but the more I think about it, the more I question the practice in general. I've always been "pro-choice" but this has actually lead me to to question whether or not we a responsibility for our own sperm or egg when combined to create anew life. (I don't mean embryonic life, I mean independent, out of the womb life...although this is another contentious issue). Yes, I am still pro-choice BUT....I'm really, really worried. We have opened a huge Pandora's box. Reproductive technologies have already opened the door to donor/vendor sperm/egg (sperm/egg banking) and traditional surrogacy (contracting away responsibility for child conceived and gestated from a woman's egg/womb) Under the banner of reproductive freedom, the industry seems to be operating without any restraint or regulation. This has given the impression that that it is fine, under these circumstances, to intentionality negate responsibility for our reproductive gametes. The de-stigmatization/normalizing of donor/egg/womb vending, is changing society. If society continues to condone this, it essentially turns procreation and children into commodities through the selling/donating and negating of responsibility of some individuals sperm and eggs, in order to fill the needs and wants of commissioning parent(s). Given these back door changes, how can we as a society say that "motherhood" or "fatherhood" has any meaning beyond the parenting needs of adults? How can we say that we have a responsibility for our own sperm and egg when combined to create a new life? How does society promote this responsibility and responsible choices? What about the "children"? (or the adults we turn into) What about those of us who do care, deeply, about where and who (all of them) we come from and/or those of us who feel a loss in never being acknowledged or able to have a meaningful (loving/nurturing) relation with these people? This doesn't just affect us, the donor conceived, it effects our children, our 'donor' parent's social children and parents (our biological grandparents). It affects our society and our culture. It seems as if it has now come to a point where we can no longer say that "biological/genetic mothers"," biological/genetic fathers" or" biological/genetic family" matter to children. Wouldn't it be discriminating to say so? Does our current political correctness only allow us to support the wants/needs of adults? In the case of adoption, although it has many ethical problems of it sown, as an institution is meant to remedy, what society agrees, is a tragic situation for the child, where the child can not be loved/nurtured by his/her bio/genetic parents. But with sperm/egg/womb donating/vending, how can we say that even adoption is a loss for the "child"? Perhaps for the "birth mother" but only if she feels or acknowledges a loss. Otherwise we could just consider it a surrogacy arrangement. If biology doesn't matter and the child was loved and wanted by his (adoptive) parents, where is the tragedy for the" child"? So why not just sell your eggs and womb? How can you argue against it? And how can anyone now say that we have a responsibility for our own sperm and egg when they combine to create a new life? America is a great land of opportunity but with our individualist/rights oriented, pursuit of happiness goals combined with the free market and political correctness mandate, I believe we are becoming a society without any shared values; or at least any that we can speak of. Banning anonymous 'donors-vendors' and 'surrogates' only gives us information but it doesn't promote responsibility beyond that information. But I would still support a person's right to know their biological/genetic identity and extended family, even if we don't like what we find in the end. It is our choice to make, no one elses.

  • Donorconceived 11/07/2008 2:54:00 AM

    Like Damien, I am also a donor conceived person who didn't feel comfortable or realize the conundrum of my conception until after I became a mother. Having children of my own has put an entirely different spin on the repercussions of method of my conception. It's not about me anymore. This effects my children and their children as well. Only after seeing this from their perspective did I realize that all those suppressed, "I don't have a right to complain, I should just be grateful" were suppressing, dysfunctional, inhibited, flawed and invalidating. Not just for us but for our entire society and culture. I am not a religious person (at all) nor do I belong to any political party (I am an independent) but the more I think about it, the more I question the practice in general. I've always been "pro-choice" but this has actually lead me to to question whether or not we a responsibility for our own sperm or egg when combined to create anew life. (I don't mean embryonic life, I mean independent, out of the womb life...although this is another contentious issue). Yes, I am still pro-choice BUT....I'm really, really worried. We have opened a huge Pandora's box. Reproductive technologies have already opened the door to donor/vendor sperm/egg (sperm/egg banking) and traditional surrogacy (contracting away responsibility for child conceived and gestated from a woman's egg/womb) Under the banner of reproductive freedom, the industry seems to be operating without any restraint or regulation. This has given the impression that that it is fine, under these circumstances, to intentionality negate responsibility for our reproductive gametes. The de-stigmatization/normalizing of donor/egg/womb vending, is changing society. If society continues to condone this, it essentially turns procreation and children into commodities through the selling/donating and negating of responsibility of some individuals sperm and eggs, in order to fill the needs and wants of commissioning parent(s). Given these back door changes, how can we as a society say that "motherhood" or "fatherhood" has any meaning beyond the parenting needs of adults? How can we say that we have a responsibility for our own sperm and egg when combined to create a new life? How does society promote this responsibility and responsible choices? What about the "children"? (or the adults we turn into) What about those of us who do care, deeply, about where and who (all of them) we come from and/or those of us who feel a loss in never being acknowledged or able to have a meaningful (loving/nurturing) relation with these people? This doesn't just affect us, the donor conceived, it effects our children, our 'donor' parent's social children and parents (our biological grandparents). It affects our society and our culture. It seems as if it has now come to a point where we can no longer say that "biological/genetic mothers"," biological/genetic fathers" or" biological/genetic family" matter to children. Wouldn't it be discriminating to say so? Does our current political correctness only allow us to support the wants/needs of adults? In the case of adoption, although it has many ethical problems of it sown, as an institution is meant to remedy, what society agrees, is a tragic situation for the child, where the child can not be loved/nurtured by his/her bio/genetic parents. But with sperm/egg/womb donating/vending, how can we say that even adoption is a loss for the "child"? Perhaps for the "birth mother" but only if she feels or acknowledges a loss. Otherwise we could just consider it a surrogacy arrangement. If biology doesn't matter and the child was loved and wanted by his (adoptive) parents, where is the tragedy for the" child"? So why not just sell your eggs and womb? How can you argue against it? And how can anyone now say that we have a responsibility for our own sperm and egg when they combine to create a new life? America is a great land of opportunity but with our individualist/rights oriented, pursuit of happiness goals combined with the free market and political correctness mandate, I believe we are becoming a society without any shared values; or at least any that we can speak of. Banning anonymous 'donors-vendors' and 'surrogates' only gives us information but it doesn't promote responsibility beyond that information. But I would still support a person's right to know their biological/genetic identity and extended family, even if we don't like what we find in the end. It is our choice to make, no one elses.

  • Damian 11/07/2008 1:59:00 AM

    As a donor conceived person I agree whole heartedly with Kathleen, although I at one point in my life I wouldn't have. But then I became an adult, got married and had children of my own. Only then did I fully realise what had been deprived from me. And to be completely honest it has been an extremely traumatic process that I do not wish on others. Our rights under the United Nations Conventions of the Rights of the Child have been infringed upon. It is very easy for others not in our situation to make soapbox comments about how we should or shouldn't feel because they themselves (for the vast majority) have their heritage and kinship intact. Donor conception transfers the pain of infertility onto the offpsring in the form of kinship separation and loss of identity which is then perpetuated in subsequent generations.

  • Allison 11/06/2008 7:37:00 PM

    So... Kathleen's logic is extremely flawed. I feel very sorry for her. And more so for her parents. Every planned pregnancy should be classified as "selfish" according to Kathleen. Is Kathleen out on a crusade to pass legislation around every parental decision that could be made that could be damaging to a child? That is one hell of a lot of legislation to pass!! By the way - not every donor-conceived child thinks their conception method damaged them. Just like not every adopted child believes knowing neither biological parent is damaging to them. Why is only one side of this story told? It's the more interesting and provocative side?

  • Michelle Jorgenson 11/06/2008 8:55:00 AM

    I gave birth to a baby girl over ten pounds in 1998. I was in a lesbian relationship. I used donor 3066 ccb. She is ten years old now with 5 half sisters and 7 half brothers through the same donor. Any questions or comments welcome. Michelle

  • Ohiomom 11/06/2008 6:20:00 AM

    Not true. Not true. Many donor kids know the truth and don't care.

  • wendy 11/05/2008 9:42:00 PM

    "The Society's spokesman, Sean Tipton, also points out that while the folks on the Donor Sibling Registry might criticize the industry, there are thousands of donor-conceived children out there who don't appear to have these identity issues, and who don't make any noise." Yes this is true, but only because 90% of heterosexual couples never tell their children the truth about their conception. It is because of this deception that the majority of donor conceived people are then "silent". There is no proper education and counseling at the front door of the sperm banks for the donors or the parents about the needs of the donor conceived and the curiosities that we now know so many children (adults) are living with. It is an innate human desire to want to know where you come from. These parents and donors are therefore not able to make fully educated decisions about the process. In addition to the potential curiosities of the people to be born, both donors and parents should know that with DNA testing and Google, a promise of anonymity is simply not feasible anymore and that 50 or 100 children may be born from any one donor (there is no accurate record keeping by the sperm banks).

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy