Top

arts

Stories

 

Pleasure Cruiser

Why is Paul Villinski's "Emergency Response Studio" parked outside Rice Gallery?

New York-based artist Paul Villinski has built a really impressive mobile art studio for "Paul Villinski — Emergency Response Studio." It's a 30-foot Gulf Stream Cavalier trailer that the artist essentially gutted and transformed into a solar-powered, off-the-grid workspace. It's outfitted with all the essentials: worktable, toolboxes, compressor, storage for art supplies, kitchen, fridge, bathroom, shower...lava lamp. The solar panels (an $80,000 in-kind donation to Villinski's project) provide more than enough energy to fuel the trailer's electric needs, and, if necessary, a mini wind turbine can make up the difference. It's the kind of thing you'd see on HGTV or perhaps another program touting off-the-wall "green" residencies. So why is it parked outside the Rice Gallery?

The mobile studio is impressive, but calling it art opens up a can of worms.
Rice Gallery staff
The mobile studio is impressive, but calling it art opens up a can of worms.

Villinski, 48, uses found materials in his artwork. Having grown up as an Air Force brat, much of his work addresses flight: butterflies made from beer cans, wing apparatuses built from discarded construction-site gloves. He visited New Orleans in 2006, about a year after Katrina, to create works for a show at Jonathan Ferrara Gallery. He made butterflies out of plastic yard signs that were still strewn about after the hurricane.

While in New Orleans, Villinski got the itch to produce artwork inspired by the recent disaster, but felt he needed to move his studio from New York to the Gulf Coast in order to work. (Funny, Banksy didn't bring his London studio when he bombed the Big Easy.) The result is "Emergency Response Studio," built from the same type of trailer FEMA deployed after the catastrophe.

As an example of a self-sustaining ­living-and-working space, "ERS" is quite remarkable, but it opens up a can of worms when it's presented as art, especially in the way Villinski envisioned the project. In the gallery brochure, Villinski writes, "I believe we ought to deploy artists as part of the mix of disaster workers, medical personnel, NGOs, architects and urban planners — those people charged with responding to, repairing and re-­envisioning disaster sites like New Orleans."

Villinski imagines himself as a "combat artist" like the ones who went to war armed with paint and brushes to document battles. Thing is, as self-serving, opportunistic and condescending as that sounds (Villinski obviously knows where to scavenge for art supplies), there's no art here. And as a result, "ERS" comes off as a showboating display of narcissism and excess. Where is the art Villinski created while in New Orleans? How is this tricked-out FEMA trailer going to transform and rebuild New Orleans culturally? I needed to consult an actual New Orleanian.

Ashley Lu, Katrina survivor, Khon's bar/gallery owner and an artist herself, has mixed feelings about Villinski's motive. "You only need combat artists when all the artists are dead," she says. It's a good point. Why does Villinski feel he can comment on the situation any better than the artists who actually lived through it?

"The focus seems to be to allow an outsider privileged status," says Lu. "It's about deploying artists rather than 'we need to get this to the artists.' When [Villinski] says 'artists,' he's talking about himself. The lack of mention of the local art community is of concern. What meaningful contribution does he have to rebuilding New Orleans or Bolivar or Galveston — rebuilding it culturally?"

From November 1, 2008, to January 18, 2009, "Emergency Response Studio" was on view in the biennial exhibition "Prospect.1 New Orleans." Just over a month after Ike, one would think Villinski might want to give his project a real trial run, roll that baby into Bolivar and provide some "art relief." Plenty of art supplies strewn around, after all. But he didn't even deploy himself. Villinski's swanky pad remained parked in New Orleans, attracting onlookers and the press.

The Times-Picayune called "ERS" an "amazing place" and "one of the most ambitious of the many ambitious works in Prospect.1." The paper quoted Villinski saying he wanted to assist in the rebuilding process. He wanted to "get both feet in and really understand what was going on...to try to contribute creatively in some way." But where's the contribution? There isn't any artwork on display. Villinski's idea of artists responding to disaster feels tantamount to Scientologists showing up to give massages.

Lu imagines that the local response to "ERS" would've been much different just after the storm. "If he rolled that thing in, I can imagine 12 or so people, locals, who would say, 'Oh, this is an emergency housing art studio? I'm an artist. Where do I hang my hat?'" The endeavor's lack of art product raises suspicions as well. "If I could see the work he produced in this New Orleans residence, I might be transfixed," she says, "in awe. But without it...it's a little arbitrary and forced."

Villinski writes, "The presence of the 'Emergency Response Studio' in New Orleans called attention to the fact, that in many respects, the city remains in a state of emergency. It also suggested that the inventive, nontraditional thinking practiced by visual artists can be a valuable part of the mix as we attempt to heal what is damaged and confront challenges of all sorts." But how? Villinski never offers any examples.

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Abraham Ritchie 02/23/2009 5:16:00 PM

    This review seems written by someone that lacks a very basic grounding in twentieth century art. The argument about whether Paul Villinski's Emergency Response Studio "is this art" is besides the point and tragically outdated. I mean has this critic even heard of Duchamp? Can we expect equal outrage over the MOMA's snowshovel (In Advance of a Broken Arm, 1915) displayed as art? Not only do the antecedents to this piece lie over a century ago, there are also artists currently working in a similar vein, even explicitly examining mobile living units. In fact Andrea Zittel exhibited in Houston in 2005! Yet the author makes no mention of other artists working in similar modes and instead chooses to attack Villinski in an outmoded language about a "lack of art product." Perhaps Mr. Schulze would prefer a banner saying ART draped over the piece, so he is less confused. Schulze also accuses Villinski of: "backhandedly suggest[ing] that rescue workers, medical professionals and city planners don't think inventively to solve problems." When all the artist ACTUALLY says is: "It also suggested that the inventive, nontraditional thinking practiced by visual artists can be a valuable part of the mix as we attempt to heal." How does that statement backhandedly suggest anything? It doesn't single anyone else out, doesn't disparage the work in New Orleans, it merely suggests that artists "can be a valuable part of [that] mix." What a egregious misreading by Schulze of a SIMPLE statement! I'm also not convinced that Troy Schulze understands Prospect.1's goal, to let artists create work which would then bring tourists and money to the city. It was very baldly commercial, rebuilding the tourism industry and simply bringing in money to the city was a stated goal. So when Schulze cuttingly states: "Villinski's swanky pad remained parked in New Orleans, attracting onlookers and the press." The artwork is actually accomplishing its goals in the city, but Schulze doesn't see or understand that, a dangerous thing for a critic. Also by implying that the artist should have left the work in New Orleans, the author overlooks the fact that by bringing it to Houston, Villinski is reminding a different geographic area again of New Orleans. Attracting the press and bringing attention to New Orleans is a very large aspect of the way this functions. Another piece Schulze overlooks. Ironically, the first comment from New Orleans artist 'Sidonie' showed a better grasp of the artwork itself, its context and its wider function than the author of this article ever came close to. What a disappointing, personal attack on the artist and what a disappointing, uninformed review.

  • J. Jenkins 02/16/2009 10:06:00 PM

    Thank goodness you wrote this article! After viewing this exhibition at Rice University Gallery, I began asking the same questions about the value of this project. I wondered about Mr. Villinski's motivations and why he insisted on calling this project "art". I also came to the conclusion that this project is completely self serving, narcissistic, and exploitative. I do have to give Mr. Villinski credit for his business acumen. To fly in from New York a year after the event and understand how to pocket a huge commission from a disaster he has no actual connection to is pretty clever. Not an original idea (see Wikipedia article entitled "Carpetbagger"), but clever nonetheless. For anyone to suggest that this project has had or could have had value to anyone in the lower Ninth Ward after Katrina seems utterly ludicrous. If you actually believe that, I strongly suggest you stop talking to anyone involved in the buying, selling, or creation of art, and begin interacting with the people in the Ninth Ward you purport to know so much about.

  • J. Jenkins 02/16/2009 10:06:00 PM

    Thank goodness you wrote this article! After viewing this exhibition at Rice University Gallery, I began asking the same questions about the value of this project. I wondered about Mr. Villinski's motivations and why he insisted on calling this project "art". I also came to the conclusion that this project is completely self serving, narcissistic, and exploitative. I do have to give Mr. Villinski credit for his business acumen. To fly in from New York a year after the event and understand how to pocket a huge commission from a disaster he has no actual connection to is pretty clever. Not an original idea (see Wikipedia article entitled "Carpetbagger"), but clever nonetheless. For anyone to suggest that this project has had or could have had value to anyone in the lower Ninth Ward after Katrina seems utterly ludicrous. If you actually believe that, I strongly suggest you stop talking to anyone involved in the buying, selling, or creation of art, and begin interacting with the people in the Ninth Ward you purport to know so much about.

  • jonathan ferrara 02/12/2009 11:10:00 PM

    I have just finished reading your article for the third time and I feel that there needs to be some commentary to balance the one-sided view you have offered with regard to Paul Villinski's Emergency Response Studio project. First, let me clarify that Villinski did not swoop in to New Orleans, uninvited, and begin to try and "tell" us New Orleanians how to deal with "our" crisis. I had met Paul in NY two years prior to Katrina and after "our" disaster, I invited him to come to NOLA in August 2006 to stay with me and source his materials, as is he does in NY, from his immediate surroundings which in NOLA meant the detritus on a Katrina-wrecked landscape (1 yr after it was still EVERYWHERE) His sensitivity to "our" crisis was evident in the works that were created out of the materials he found across NOLA from the Lower 9th to Lakeview and St Bernard. (see his 2006 Airlift exhibition) The validation of this is in the response it garnered from New Orleanians who responded so positively to the show. This where ERS was born, in his wanting to stay in New Orleans and make work to respond to the crisis, he needed a studio to work out of...thus the idea. And for all of those who said that the work should have been New Orleans artists...I say that we, NOLA artists, were trying to rebuild our studios and get our lives back together (ask the folks in Galveston, god bless them) Now on to ERS in specific. Villinski created ERS as a prototype that could be deployed to respond to natural disasters across the country. Without a mobile studio how can an artist, in the Lower 9th Ward or anywhere, respond to the environment and the situation. Why dont you start there? The conceptual nature of this work is THE POINT. Asking whether it is art or not, is to be very short-sighted and narrow-minded. the piece is part installation, part architecture,part conceptual and so many more things. At the base of his work is the concept of transformation and ERS is just that, a conceptual transformation of a symbol of destruction into a symbol of hope. If you had lived through Katrina where every damn inch of green space was taken over by FEMA trailers you would understand more fully that this work symbolizes hope for a new and better way of thinking about of post disaster living / creating. And when you interview only one person,Ms. Lu, and she "imagines the local response", I say why dont you do your journalistic job and interview those in NOLA where the concept originated not those that "imagined" it. The tone of this response is more personal than I am normally inclined to write as a gallerist, but your article demeans the over two years of work the artist, me and the numerous supporters across the country have put into this great project. In addition, as someone who lived through Katrina and its aftermath and continues to live in NOLA and be a part of the rebuilding, I take it personally. If you want to talk to me further, feel free to call me, email me or the like as i stand ready to explain, defend and promote this great project. Creatively and Gratefully, Jonathan Ferrara, Artist, Gallerist, Community Activist

  • Sidonie 02/12/2009 7:57:00 PM

    As an artist living in New Orleans I still see FEMA trailers and am sensitive to their ability to so easily evoke disaster and disappointment. I believe his trailer is a very subtle and yet complex response to the situation. He has taken his time and empathized with what it means to recover while folding hope back into such a concrete disaster and political failure. As an art critic with your one interviewee, I find your elitist, narcissistic comments misplaced and the disconnect in your statement weak when reviewing a piece as emotionally loaded, uplifting and innovative as this. For the people outside of New Orleans to be able to take in this space is assuming they have the empathy and open-mindedness to associate his shiny beacon of hope with the disaster at home. And just because he wasn't here to experience it doesn't mean that his interpretation gets discarded. Living here all of my life I am too aware that this city functions much better with transplants and visitors. Villinski may not live in New Orleans but his trailer is just another welcome visual thought, which I call art.

 

Most Popular Stories

  • MasterMinds 2012
    This year's winners have art, passion and history on their side. And now they'll also each have a check for $2,000.
  • A Nerd Is Forever
    Muscular, green and uglified, Constantine Maroulis impresses at the Alley as The Toxic Avenger.
  • Forest "Dweller"
    Kent Dorn's paintings are kinda icky — and we love them.
  • More Most Popular>>
for free stuff, theater info & more!

Find A Coupon

Popular Coupons

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy