-
onewayoranother 12/28/2011 10:15:00 PM
How about 50% to a gallery?
-
Dennis 11/20/2011 4:20:00 AM
Artists: NEVER PAY TO PLAY!
-
Knowledge4power 04/04/2011 2:53:00 AM
Maybe now that the husband Paul has died (verified in the Chronicle www.chron.com), the mother and daughter can pay the deserving artist with any insurance they may be paid, and now this "personal problem" can no longer be used as an excuse to rip off hard working artists. We ALL have our own sad stories. Artists often have very sad stories leading to their artistic passion. Those women should get out of the business if they don't have a way to run things professionally. They have created nothing more than a ponzi scheme. I was hoping to have my first gallery showing there since I live only a few streets away and assumed... Thanks for the warning. I will protest on the street to stop them and warn unaware artists if a group wants to join me...?
-
04/02/2011 6:32:00 AM
I knew that I was not the only one that had money issues with Heidi in 2005, but I thought she must have gotten her books straight and changed the way she did bussiness... guess not. I hope that the District Attorney's office launches a criminal investigation of the gallery. If it's a case of bad bookkeeping then take a bussiness class and pay up, if its fraud then give them jail time.
Please help emerging Artist and Dont buy from this gallery or this person.
-
guest 03/25/2011 7:11:00 PM
I don't know anything to all about this art business, but I do know that Paul Bernstein died two days ago. He suffered a stroke in 2009 and was in & out hospitals since that time.
-
Timgreene 03/17/2011 3:09:00 PM
So H. Gallery stands for Heist Gallery?
-
Stephen Hawkins 03/15/2011 9:42:00 PM
Do not... Believe.... The Aliens..... They are dan....gerous, We humans.... will achieve a collective.... mind. Money will be not...... be necessary.......in the future.....people will trade goods.....artist will trade art..... for food...... Galleries will not.....be needed
The owners of H Gallery..........should think about.........opening a Taco stand........
as long as they don't.......rip off their clients ........ by serving stray cat's meat....instead of ......beef.
Your ......Daddy.....Hawkins
-
Concerned UFO 03/15/2011 9:35:00 PM
You humans posses a collective conscience: a set of social norms by which a society and its members abide, when someone breaks the established norms, i tis perfectly just to punish such individuals by embarrassing publicly, specially when this embarrassment will alert other humans of possible harm. We admire that quality in you, our fellow humans. In our universe we do not have PRESS because we are telepathic.
And by the way since we have made contact, we would like to clarify that the Big Bang was not the beginning, and we do not endorse the theory of "Eternal Expansion."
The Big Bang was produced inside a black hole inside an alternate universe, and this happens all the time. Your very own universe is producing Big Bangs all the time.
Anyway, just thought you'd like to know
-
Jim Adams 03/15/2011 3:11:00 PM
I thot the malicious slamming was trite when it started.
Best
Jim
and may we all note, that even after I've been credited with being a vendettaizing, unpleasant, rabble rousing, socially awkward weasel, no one has charged me with not being a great artist.
-
Enough!!!! 03/15/2011 3:05:00 PM
Jim,
I am saying that this endless slamming of both parties seems to be getting trite. Please go to the DA and let this be settled in court...THEN do a story of the outcome. It just seemed that the defenders of Mrs. Bernstein and Ms. Prera are actually part of the "lynch mob" when I read comments like:
Please note that a Houston Police officer will be on duty at any gallery showings this weekend at this facitlity for your safety and protection.
This is obviously not posted by an employee or owner of the H Gallery but by someone trying to encite more responses by showing poor business practices and decisions. IF it was the H Gallery that posted this I too question ther sanity but really...who thinks a troubled business owner would announce protection at an event. Appears to be a great way to discourage people from attending but hopefully we can all see through the BS.
Good luck with whatever you decide to do and I look forward to seeing the outcome published as a factual article instead of an overhyped tabloid cover story.
-
True witness UFO seeker 03/15/2011 2:50:00 PM
what about the UFOs that hovered over the arts market that afternoon, they were wearing green when it was not St Patrick's day , how unfashionable, how come not body slapped them, get real people, stop the alien invasion
-
T.M. 03/15/2011 2:26:00 PM
This is rucking fetarded
-
Jim Adams 03/15/2011 1:06:00 AM
this was my way of saying 'enough'....you will note it the statement was framed in a conjectural manner and prefaced with the description 'classless' . I see no strong condemnation on your part of the vile and incessant personal attacks on the victims - laughable as they may be, I've seen no statements of disavowal of this sort of thing from the principals at H Gallery.
For standing up for the truth and I and the other victims of these two individuals have been subjected to no end of libeless statements, inuendo, and attack from one or two cowards hiding behind screen names. My response in this particular instance was measured and worded to make a point - that nasty, pointless personal attacks are happening here apparently because some individuals cannot make any sort of defense for their own depredations.
I am still getting reports from more victims. One gentleman has had close to $5000 owed to him for sales in Dec, he has received the standard dodges, evasions, promises ( 'the check's in the mail' - no check has arrived. ), What was reported in the article was factual. There is apparently more out there than was known for certain when the article was published. This information is being collected - only first hand reports. The victims are being advised of the ongoing actions - both in the civil and criminal arenas. A complaint has been registered with the Harris County Distict Attorney's office and the DA's office is at this point soliciting additional input from aggrieved.
that this tragedy has degenerated to this point is as disappointing to me as anyone else - this does not change the facts of a very widespread and long term pattern of artists not receiving monies for sales of their work, it does not change the facts that principals of the H Gallery chose to not respond to Mr. Lomax request for their say in this matter, it does not change the fact that a very nasty pattern of cowardly attacks upon the victims by individuals whose courage is directly proportional to their anonymenity has been mounted in this forem.
So, are you telling me that a very nasty statement in a conjectural manner may not be warrented after all of this.
Best.
Jim
-
Enough!!! 03/14/2011 11:46:00 PM
Jim,
Reading this article and the comments I am surprised you have struck so low. It is obvious to me that someone malicious is defending the H Gallery just to keep this story alive. I have been to H Gallery and actually had you try and explain your work and the "great respect and admiration" you had for the owners. That was in September 2010 and now you are crying like a baby. Glad I didn't like your sculptures and the fact I never made a purchase at the Gallery. All involved seem to be living a lie...including yourself.
-
John Lomax 03/14/2011 3:33:00 PM
This is a story on both "how hard it is to be an artist in the town or a small business." If you believe that H Gallery ripped off all those artists, then the story shows the potential pitfalls of being an artist. If you believe that H Gallery simply fell behind in paying their artists, as Sandy Bernstein said, then the article shows the perils of running a small business.
-
1 Heart 03/14/2011 10:23:00 AM
The Houston Press should stop all this mess. Why not do a story on how hard it is to be an artist in the town or a small business. Everyone wanting to cause someones downfall in the name of what? Progress, fame or just entertainment. Is this any different than throwing Christians to the lions. Artists in this town need patrons and supporters, not hate, abuse or a bull shit article about how we allow ourselves to get screwed. I am sure there will be comments stating how stupid I am or how someone wants to slap me for thinking this way, so I say now. You have the right to your comments, but maybe we should think about what we do when we chew on bloody, red meat in public.
-
T.M. 03/14/2011 9:50:00 AM
This is fucking retarded.
-
T.M. 03/14/2011 12:12:00 AM
i did not post that whats going on
-
T.M. 03/14/2011 12:11:00 AM
if you are part of the DA's office, you should have no problem identifying yourself, but obviously you are not, you could be in trouble for pretending to be part of the police
-
tango88 03/13/2011 8:22:00 PM
Yet another crock of fantasy from someone trying their best to distract from the fact that they have a long history of fraud and theft by deception.
A DIRECT CHALLENGE: If what has been written in the Houston Press and the claims made by a host of local artists (including myself) constitute libel and/or slander...then file the appropriate suits and let's get all the facts and testimony on record in a court of law. If your claims hold up, you stand to make almost enough money to pay off what you currently owe to artists. And that's a lot of money. At last count, more than enough to qualify as a Felony, by the way. But, the facts are that H gallery and Ms. Prera have been systematically ripping off young (and naive) artists for years. They have suckered them in with no intention of paying them or any history of adequate payment to support any claim to the contrary. She knows it...the artists know it...and shortly, the Justice system will know it.
And, regarding the list of victims...it will indeed be handed of to the Harris County District Attorneys Office soon enough, along with signed affidavits as to the results of their dealings with H Gallery. The only issue right now is when to close the list. As a result of Mr. Lomax's article, more artists are coming forward with the same story almost daily, and except for an embarrassed few, most have indicated not only a willingness to stand up in court and testify, but are indeed anxious to do so.
So, my advice is, unless you plan to skip town (or the country)...get your paperwork in order or make some up fast.
As for Claire Richards standing at this Studio, she is not only an outstanding tenant who keeps up with her rent, but she is the one person here I entrust with the keys to watch over things when I am away on business. Don't shoot your mouth off with insinuations when you have nothing but wishful, malicious fabrications to back them up as you have been doing since the Press put a light on your slimy operation. No one, including a judge, cares what your fantasies are. But a growing number of people do care a great deal about the facts surrounding your history with artists and how consistently their money and art seem to vanish when under your control.
As local artists, we may not be able to correct the ills on Wall Street or prevent any future wars, but we can and will certainly do what is right in this case and put an end to any further scams by this particular operation.
Have a nice day.
-
T.M. 03/13/2011 7:49:00 PM
I meant to say didn't
-
T.M. 03/13/2011 7:48:00 PM
we have proof that we did take money from them, come to the trial
-
T.M. 03/13/2011 7:46:00 PM
I am not crazy
-
T.M. 03/13/2011 7:37:00 PM
They did not get their money because they never asked for it, we called them and called them and they never picked up the phone, that's not our fault
-
Jim Adams 03/13/2011 7:28:00 PM
Should the two of you of the nom du jour ( name of the day, should my limited understanding of French not be adequate) wish to substantiate your claim that I was served with any sort of papers - divorce or otherwise when I was present on the premises of the H Gallery, you have my full welcome to do so. I will be happy to provide you with the name of the opposing counsel and you could go for a sworn statement ( this term pops up so frequently ) of when this happened, etc. If you are unable to produce this, would we then conclude that your statement is nothing but another nasty lie.
I'd be tickled that you show the courage to reveal you real name instead of continueing to hide behind a screen name to spew out your drivel.
Not that I expect you to come close to rising to this challenge, I do expect to see more shrill inuendo, insults, and downright lies.
That attacks on an indivual's family issues have been made as direct statements by some anonymous coward is not particularly surprizing in context with the rest of the attacks on the victims. That the attacks are all from one or another nom du jour ( the style doesn't seem to vary a great deal ) could suggest a number of things - the one certainty is pure cowardice and malice on the part of the writer. I'll be generous here and suggest that if the principals of H Gallery are not behind this chicken poop they should show some class and disavow such odious actions in their behalf.
A rhetorical question here is "Is it your basic character that causes you to attempt to smear the victims of this mess as readily and consistently as you do, all the while completely avoiding the issue that these people have had their trust betrayed, their work and money stolen?". Another rhetorical question, " Do you look your self in the mirror and see only rightousness for what you are doing here?" .
Being a cowardly, irresponsible sociopath breaks no laws. Malicously besmirching an individuals reputation with false statements is libel.
Best.
Jim Adams
-
T.M. 03/13/2011 7:28:00 PM
i was there with my grandma and what we saw was surreal, they threw her around like a doll and she bled, she started combulsioning like in the excorsist movie, kids satrted throwing stones at her, the police came and arrested about 20 people then she tripped on a banana peel and hurt her head, the pope was there too, he was pissed, and the mayor said... oh no girl, drama
-
....... 03/13/2011 7:09:00 PM
everyone will get paid for what we owe them, give us a break, mind your own business
-
....... 03/13/2011 7:06:00 PM
we didn't take no one's money, we were simply late on our bills
-
....... 03/13/2011 6:59:00 PM
perhaps you did not call her bad names, but still, its a public place
-
Scorpio 03/13/2011 6:31:00 PM
prove it Sandy
-
Concerned Citizen 03/13/2011 3:09:00 PM
Actually, it is of interest how Jim Adams has treated other females in the past. Just wait till the subpoenas hit the fan. You won't understand the word "balance" for a long time buddy. Besides, I wouldn't want readers to believe that court documents were served to Sandy Bernstein or Heidi Powell Prera, another lie. Mr. Adams is who was served, and his wife IS one heck of a gal. ;-) And, you're free to subpoena Heidi's dad. We'd like nothing more than for him to meet you face to face in court. :-)
-
from out of the blue 03/12/2011 5:22:00 PM
hitting new depths here. Would an equally classless remark such as " Heidi's father never married her mother - smart guy" restore a little balance to the universe.
-
Kristy 03/12/2011 3:41:00 PM
Let's not get sidetracked. HGallery's representatives received money from artists in exchange for signed contracts promising to pay artists for their work when it sold. The gallery owners did not live up to their side of the agreement. All the personal crap being spewed in the comment section is nothing but a smokescreen. It is posted by the gallery owner & friends in a lame attempt to deflect attention from their own criminal activity.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/12/2011 12:42:00 PM
Mark, can you come give a sworn statment that no public obscenities were issued towards Powell Prera in public by Johathan Lopez? What you are writing here does not match other sworn statments that have been made. You are free and welcome to come back up your post with an actual legal sworn statement.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/12/2011 12:33:00 PM
To whom it may concern,
To any art patron, customer, buyer, volunteer, or any citizen who has been made uncomfortable by the actions of anyone who has acted as part of a lynch mob towards H Gallery due to the article above. Please note that a Houston Police officer will be on duty at any gallery showings this weekend at this facitlity for your safety and protection.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/12/2011 12:30:00 PM
"an HP fan", can you please bring documentation that shows that what you wrote is true; "clearly the owners of the gallery are the only ones posting in defense of H Gallery and liking their own posts"?
Please bring your sworn statements and business record affidavits to this.
I also want you to bring business record affidavits showing how you believe someone is "Pretending to be part of the DA's office."
You just may be surprised to know just who has visited the DA's office and given statements.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/12/2011 12:25:00 PM
Mark, can you come down to the DA's office with medical documentation and business record affidavits that show how Sandy Bernsteins "brain must not be functioning that well"? They are of interest.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/12/2011 12:24:00 PM
Actually, Donald Tucker, it may be of interest to explain to you that it is unwise to issue veiled threats to any citizen, patron, volunteer, customer, et all who disagrees with your stance and who may opt to associate with, support, or assist Sandy Bernstein and Heidi Powell Prera. Any individual is free to support these women and/or their business.
There have been no criminal charges filed, nor are there any Judements declaring a "ponzi scheme" as Donald has written.
Donald, your victims who are "lining up daily", I'm curious, have they paid a visit to the DA's office? ( answer truthfully, I may know the answer to that). Donald, has Sandy Bernstein paid a visit to the DA's office? (answer truthfully, I may know the answer to that one too)
Donald, is there an open investigation into H Gallery? (answer truthfully, I amy also know the answer to that one)
You are free to bring any of your business records Donald, along with business record affidavits to the DA's office to support your stance, in fact, you being invited to do so.
There's some mighty big talk here, but so far things are not what they appear at all.
-
tango88 03/12/2011 5:12:00 AM
No threats are necessary. If you lie down with dogs, expect fleas. In this (criminal) case, anyone involved, either directly in Ms. Prera's Ponzi scheme or who lies to support her case is by definition an accomplice and subject to the full extent of the law as such. Hope to see you in court...and soon, "mystery lady". More victims are lining up daily and would very much like to be heard.
-
Mark 03/12/2011 2:20:00 AM
u have lost your mind Sandy, and your brain must not be functioning that well, your posts reveal your identity
-
...... 03/12/2011 2:17:00 AM
it's mr..... mark...
-
affectedartist 03/12/2011 2:15:00 AM
Lies wont get you anywhere Mrs ........ people can not be distracted of the main issue: , you being a shameless thief
-
Mark 03/12/2011 2:12:00 AM
This is ridiculous, I was there I witnessed the whole thing, Jonathan never said a bad word to Heidi, he simply warned the artists that she and akked Heidi if she was insane by showing up. it is oboius that she is. The situation was obviusly uncomfortable specially ofr Heidi after the market director also, very nicely told her to leave, but there were no patrons or children around just us the artists. I know everyone in that circle and know for sure that no one would post a comment on their defense or make up such lies.
Its easy to connect the dots, Heidi and Sandy are the the ones attempting to badmouth the artists by posting all these lies. Heidi is obviusly furious that she was escorted out and wants revenge, as if she has not done enough damage already. I praise Jonathan for protecting other artists and for asking her to leave. As for Heidi, if I was you I would dig a hole and bury my head in it, you are the talk of the town woman.
-
...... 03/12/2011 2:11:00 AM
donald tucker...are you threatening me?....
-
Cindyv 03/12/2011 1:36:00 AM
she is a snake in the grass
-
Jonatan lopez 03/12/2011 12:07:00 AM
sad girl, I feel for you Heidi, welcome to reality
That would have actually been a good idea, to yell at you in front of evreyone. but no need, all people have to do is google your name to find out who you really are, and I dont think you ll be able to change that,
good luck
-
rastasol 03/11/2011 11:37:00 PM
has anyone EVER received their photos from Heidi the "photographer".... I gave her $50 to develop a roll....that was 3 years ago....ha...wonder how many others were takin for the lil stuff as well...Thank You Artists for taking a stand!!!
-
tango88 03/11/2011 11:30:00 PM
If you are not the owner of the gallery, why hide behind a bogus screen name? I am not the artist involved. I am Donald Tucker. I operate the studio in which Claire and Jason are artists-in-residence. Having done business with them for several years now I will be more than happy to testify as to their upstanding character when this CRIMINAL CASE comes to trial. As for the slime that takes advantage of the anonymity provided by public boards such as this to spew bile, you'd best stay anonymous. Otherwise you may be indicted as a co-conspirator in Ms. Heidi's crimes. I can't wait for this to go to court either. Please do make an appearance.
-
...... 03/11/2011 11:22:00 PM
lopez....people saw you bro...don't think it went unnoticed...i like the part about you not wanting to be mentioned in the follow up article....the disturbing part is how you a man would think it's okay to yell obsenities at a female...very sad to see that...
-
...... 03/11/2011 11:16:00 PM
convicted felons.....wtf...
-
...... 03/11/2011 11:16:00 PM
people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones....
-
...... 03/11/2011 11:13:00 PM
dear hpfan....i am not the owner of the gallery...but when it comes time to go to court....you will see me and others take the stand...i beg you to go to this trial if and when it comes up, so you can see how incorect you are...
-
an HP fan 03/11/2011 8:14:00 PM
Claire Richards is a hero, and John too, this is what local press should be about.
Its ridiculous to see the unsuccessful attempts by these people to try to damage her name, clearly the owners of the gallery are the only ones posting in defense of H Gallery and liking their own posts as well as pretending to be part of the DA's office, its laughable which is just stupid. If they have something logical to say in their defense they should come out in the open, call the press, HP is not the only newspaper, I am sure someone would be wanting to cover their story.
This is an important social issue, just as important public funding and other local concerns, if the artists had no proof of the allegations, clearly this article would not have been written HP knows what they are doing.
-
Jonatan Lopez 03/11/2011 7:35:00 PM
One thing I am ashamed of is of promoting your gallery and getting a few of my friends to join in the beginning, you treated them the same, I have apologized to them for making them go through such a horrible experience, perhaps you should issue a public apology to our Arts Community, it might help or make you look less bad, it would be smart
-
Jonatan Lopez 03/11/2011 7:26:00 PM
Sandy and Heidi, stop lying to try to redeem yourselves, no insults were thrown to you in front of people, you were simply asked to leave, yes, once in the parking lot when you started insulting me things got agitated. It was my duty to protect my fellow artists from you and of that I am not ashamed.You need to reexamine your own actions and your life in general, Do you even have a conscience or any morals left whatsoever? Why would you come and try to recruit more artists to a place where you knew you were not welcomed? Shame on you. Posting lies in here is really not going to help you it all, but go ahead, keep wasting your time.
And yes it would be a great idea for you to never step back on that sales district, that's the most coherent thing you've said so far
-
matt 03/11/2011 5:34:00 PM
While I cannot speak of personal experience with H Gallery, I can speak to the character and credibility of Claire Richards. That was her name 24 years ago when we met and it is her name now. And I will stand by her with a fixed and firm belief she is doing the right thing here. In court if I have to. So go on and hate. We will see who is right when the dust settles.
-
overyou 03/11/2011 10:32:00 AM
I am Claire Richards. I was born with that name and have never entertained the idea of changing it. I don't need to hide. The attacks against my character are laughable and I am grateful for them- because they really illuminate the fact that speaking out against this "gallery" (cough) was the right thing to do. Every time you guys attack me with your transparent, weak, and idiotic comments- you lose ground. You TRULY have no idea what I have spent my years of living doing if you think I could be considered any kind of criminal at all.
Instead of demanding that the artists here prove they were screwed, why don't you prove that you paid them?
Oh... guess you can't. It was just an idea.
Keep the hits coming. I love watching you dig.
-
Slam Dunk 03/11/2011 9:33:00 AM
oh? Ms. Richards, she who refuses to disclose what she has extracted from others. Was that a threat? Something is quite disturbing about you using the words "shallow grave". Especially after viewing your files. Very disturbing indeed.
-
overyou 03/11/2011 9:28:00 AM
Your desk is a shallow grave. Your tactic is boring and unimaginative. I have nothing more to add.
-
story teller 03/11/2011 9:26:00 AM
And you are saying that you have never received any of your money? Is this what you are saying publicly?
-
Biased? 03/11/2011 9:25:00 AM
tort of sedicious libel
invasion of privacy
theft of business records
grand theft auto
arson
reckless disregard for truth
actual malice
breach of fudiciary duty
extortion
stalking
This once was only about a few artists (sans Jim Adams) who had received most of their money, yet were waiting on the rest from a small business in Houston. Once upon a time, this is what the story was truly all about. Not anymore.
-
you sure 'bout dat? 03/11/2011 9:21:00 AM
So, you're saying publicly that you've never been arrested? Is this what you are saying? Just curious. Some records on my desk indicate otherwise. Shall we play, "guess the crime"? I think it's important for people to know you so they can determine if this was biased reporting or not. For example, if you were convicted of arson, or of extortion in the past this would be of great interest to the readers.
-
overyou 03/11/2011 8:19:00 AM
I am Claire Richards. I was born with that name and have never entertained the idea of changing it. I don't need to hide. The attacks against my character are laughable and I am grateful for them- because they really illuminate the fact that speaking out against this "gallery" (cough) was the right thing to do. Every time you guys attack me with your transparent, weak, and idiotic comments- you lose ground. You TRULY have no idea what I have spent my years of living doing if you think I could be considered any kind of criminal at all.
Instead of demanding that the artists here prove they were screwed, why don't you prove that you paid them.
Oh... guess you can't. It was just an idea.
Keep the hits coming. I love watching you dig.
-
yourbiggestfan 03/11/2011 4:43:00 AM
I'm totally lost as to how Richards or anyone else awaiting payment benefits this story by exposing their criminal criminal background, whether they have one or not. The article claims that H owes them money. Let's say one of the other folks in the article was a convicted puppy thief. What does that have to do with H never paying them? However, since the thrust of the article is the alleged negligence of H, which now is also alleged to stand in open breach of contract with a growing number of artists, why not peek into the criminal backgrounds of the two ladies? Neither the bad check deal or the gun conviction would be admissible in court, and neither would the mind-numbingly irrelevant accusation towards Richards. So let's drop this phony civic concern about the character of anyone in this. It's a business deal that has not been completed fairly, period. This is only about monies owed, and always has been, no matter how far some folks seem willing to create subterfuge in this comment section. Pay them. Who cares if Heidi wrote bad checks? So, she's bad with money. I think we all figured that out already. PAY THEM. If the article was about one artist, it would still be the same. Pay the artist. If there is a number of artists coming forth, which no matter how hard you try and deny it, is a fact, then if you indeed owe them, pay them. All this drama isn't the story, the story is a lack of payment. It really is that simple.
-
Destroye666r 03/11/2011 3:46:00 AM
if lomax is inclined to expose sensitive criminal information about powell prera and bernstein, then he should have also included richards. proof this was biased reporting. thank you for pointing that out, my clerk missed it. thanks buddy. 'preciate it.
-
Destroye666r 03/11/2011 3:43:00 AM
oh i can't WAIT to expose this one. Concerned Citizen, do you have those photos I sent to you? strange isn't it? how different some people can be.
-
yourbiggestfan 03/11/2011 3:37:00 AM
What's it matter? That's what you don't seem to understand. And besides, she didn't expose the criminal background of H's ladies, Lomax did. It's called journalism. Richard's fantastical criminal background may as well include seal clubbing. It's totally irrelevant to the matter at hand. She, and others, are still waiting payment.
-
Destroye666r 03/11/2011 3:37:00 AM
oh tisk, what a pity that these women appear to read as convicted felons. oh, how sketchy their backgrounds, how awful their crimes. yes.
gentlemen, put out your cigars, on my word we move now.
-
Destroye666r 03/11/2011 3:33:00 AM
oh, but "yourbiggestfan", the criminal backgrounds of Mrs. Bernstein and Ms. Powell Prera have been made public, and there is every intention from this team of making Ms. Richards public as well. it's in the public's best interest to reveal all things associated with such an article and accusations, wouldnt you agree? its how who said and did what is filtered out during discovery. if you cant catch a hard ball, then dont throw one. oh, Ms Richards will be fine. she doesn't have anything to hide, does she?
-
Destroye666 03/11/2011 3:28:00 AM
or, do some people use a phony name so you can't easily find their criminal records?
-
Destroye666r 03/11/2011 3:23:00 AM
the only time someone at h gallery was served papers was jim adams for his divorce. his wife is one heck of a gal. :-)
-
yourbiggestfan 03/11/2011 3:20:00 AM
Yeah, she'll answer that, to a baffled judge who will have no clue why that stuff has anything to do with H not paying her monies due.
-
Destroye666r 03/11/2011 3:20:00 AM
oh tisk tisk "guest", is the 'women's prison, gatesville unit, texas department of criminal justice' where "Claire Richards" served time? is this where she took art classes and received the advice to quit a day job and work as a full time artist?oh it's so fascinating how things begin to unfold, isn't it?
-
Part of a big team 03/11/2011 3:15:00 AM
so you willfully admit right here that you have no proof whatsoever of any crime H Gallery has or has not committed, it's just "sorta coulda almost because it sounds good" investigating?
you even admit that the lack of an escrow is a Misdemeanor. oh shame, your article sounded like they were in fact histronic convicted Felons. Oh dear, what's that word that is itching to come out my fingers? LlllLLL iable? oh no, it couldn't be that. could it?
tisk tisk, baaaad boy
Until you have documentation from a Judge that H Gallery has been convicted of anything you must stand accountable for your words. it is my understanding that you did not even retrieve the proper affidavits for your reporting. tisk tisk again.
Quick, what's it called when someone writes words and compares someone else to known convicted felons, thusly leading readers to believe a crime has been committed and convicted when there has been no proof whatsoever ? (ask your friend, I know you'll need some help)
quick, what's it called when a person enters a business and downloads all of their computer files, including names and social security numbers of business associates? Quick. Hurry now, you'll need some help on that one too. And, what's it called when a person continues to drive by the home of the person he downloaded the files from? And, what's it called when an automobile is stolen and set on fire?
i believe my associate invited et all to the DA's office for interviews. Have you followed through yet?
grasshoppa, you will get there. ethical jurisprudence. it's a good thing.
-
...... 03/11/2011 2:47:00 AM
additionally lomax....what king of true unbiased journalist posts on the blog....i mean you are really showing your opinion on this issue...again is this why many people disregard the houston press as an inferior "news" source...
-
...... 03/11/2011 2:44:00 AM
a better journalist would have included this information regarding the laws regarding art galleries and escrow accounts in the original article...i mean this came out a week ago right?...
-
John Lomax 03/11/2011 2:09:00 AM
A person I talked to with a very firm grasp of the laws governing art galleries and auction houses told me that all money spent in such businesses must be put it an escrow account, and failing to do so is not a civil matter but a criminal offense. A misdemeanor to be sure, but not Class C, so one that could mean jail time. Will H Gallery be able to demonstrate that all funds spent there were placed into escrow accounts?
-
...... 03/11/2011 1:54:00 AM
lomax...you would have had a much better "article"had you included interviews/details of how far jim adams has gone in his attempts to ruin powell-prera...it seems that everyone else in town knows about this adam's instability, and too many have weird emails from him beggin for help...why don't you know this, didn't you "investigate"...many in the art community have distanced themselves form him already because he has made them uncomfortable...why did you pass this up...i mean if you wanted to stir up REAL drama you could have dug a little deeper for the complete truth....makes you wonder why adams went to YOU instead of the law...........
-
telling 03/10/2011 10:08:00 PM
I guess for some people, not having a criminal record means you must have had your name changed.
-
sickened 03/10/2011 9:20:00 PM
i was there too with my aunt and we have filed a police report for public obscenity. it was freakish what we saw. that woman was being attacked. i will never step foot back in that sales district again.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/10/2011 8:54:00 PM
"Phoenix", but you've shared so much publicly, why stop now? The advise remains the same, come down and give a statement to the DA. Since you've listed so many things publicly, let's carry through. No one wants you to be "tied up" or "in bondage" to scum bag scam artists who do nothing right, and certainly no one wants to remain in "suspension" (yes, that is a malopropism as well as a double entranda) because everyone now wants to know the firm details of all the complaintants, of all the facts, of all the "players". Don't you agree?
-
...... 03/10/2011 8:41:00 PM
again...your feelings give you no right to start yelling obsinities out in public at the yale street market last weekend....their were parents with young children (like myself) present, and you really showed me how low you would go....if you have LEGITIMATE grievances, go to the da's office like 'concerned citizen' has advised you to....in my eyes your reputation was ruined forever....
-
Phoenix Voltaire 03/10/2011 8:38:00 PM
Whether civil or criminal action (or both) is pursued is not something that would be shared with you or publicly on a Comment Board. One can only ponder about your motivation in offering free legal advice to me, or anyone else on this board.
-
...... 03/10/2011 8:33:00 PM
lomax....your article was nothing more than a smear campaign, and completely one sided...this may explain why less and less people in the area read the houston press...but i think everyne is looking forward to seeing how this plays out in court, where there will be people you never considered interviewing who will take the stand...at that point the real truth will come out, but i bet their will be no follow up article....
-
Concerned Citizen 03/10/2011 7:34:00 PM
Guestwhat, If you have a tape recording of that phone call then the DA's office would like to hear it.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/10/2011 7:26:00 PM
"Phoenix" please bring a copy of your contract along with any receipts of money that is due to you to the DA's office, along with your ID and real name. Your information could be of benefit.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/10/2011 7:22:00 PM
John, there just may come a day when you get to see how much about the law I do know.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/10/2011 7:18:00 PM
Thank you for that correction. But, she will be free to state her full name and any and all pseudonyms if she is called to testify in either a criminal or civil case. She will also answer whether or not she has ever been arrested or charged with a crime.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/10/2011 7:14:00 PM
John, you may also like to know that the burden of proof does not fall on Sandy Bernstein regarding your article. The burden of proof belongs to you. She does not have to supply artists she has paid, nor her business records to you. The entire article of proof rests on your shoulders as business record affidavits are obtained from all of the victims and business institutions listed so that your story is not hearsay, but truthful. Can you bring any business record affidavits you have obtained surrounding your heist article to the DA's office so that a potential criminal heist case can be opened? You are welcome to do so.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/10/2011 7:10:00 PM
John, FYI... without a business record affidavit from Jim Adams' bank, the records do not exist in the eyes of the law. Just thought you might like to know that.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/10/2011 7:08:00 PM
John, have you checked a potential name change for "Claire Richards" nation wide? Harris County is not her only residence. As well, you may send any and all scam victims with their receipts to give sworn statements. John, I personally believe you did an excellent job on this article, make no mistake. There are much larger concerns here however. Perhaps Mr. Adams did not provide a napkin invoice to you, but, are you aware that banks photocopy all checks that come through their processing desk? It is possible for someone with faulty intentions to scroll a new memo line upon receiving their check back from the bank as cancelled. Did you contact his bank and get an actual bank photocopy of the check they processed along with a business record affidavit? Just curious. You are aware that those records are important and will be used in any pending litigation. Perhaps Mr. Adams can provide those for you so that you don't have to get a lawyer to retrieve them on your behalf. It seems that what Mr. Adams has written on a check and what he has verbally stated do no match up. As well, has Mr. Adams or Claire Richards paid a visit to the DA's office yet? (I just may already know the answer to that so answer truthfully)
-
John Lomax 03/10/2011 6:59:00 PM
My, you certainly seem to know a lot about these specific aspects of the law. One might think you had crammed, like you studied them as part of a business plan or something like that.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/10/2011 6:58:00 PM
albsure, defamation lawsuits do not happen over night. After the initial fallout comes the discovery phase. Who said what and why, and how it has proven effect on a person or business. A determination of what is Civil or Criminal is assessed. At that point sworn statments, receipts, contracts, names et all is collected into a case, then service of subpoena to those responsible, at that point a case goes to mediation, and then either a jury or judge. Prior to all of this video taped depositions most likely will occur. It can take years, but in the end, the truth typically shines forth. Your assumption that this process has not occurred yet equating guilt is nieve. I'm curious, are you an effected artist? Will you personally visit the DA's office and give a sworn statement with contract and receipts showing how H Gallery scammed you? Or, are you one of the mob that the few affected artists has aroused? Either way, you are welcome to give a statement. Hope this helps in the mob mentality that is dangerously abounding.
-
Steve 03/10/2011 6:55:00 PM
Gosh, I wish our citizens were less concerned about a small local art gallery and more concerned about things like our city services, budget, police policies...
-
John Lomax 03/10/2011 6:50:00 PM
Her name is Richards, not Richardson.
-
John Lomax 03/10/2011 6:49:00 PM
There is no record in the Harris County district clerk's office of Claire Richards changing her name, nor does she have any criminal convictions. As for Adams, as was pointed out in my article, he furnished me with copies of canceled checks clearly marked "loan, due XX-XX-20XX" on the memo line. (Nothing scrawled on a napkin was sent to me.) As for "the small group of artists," I asked Bernstein to give me the name of an artist that they had paid in full. She either could not or would not. She mentioned some guy in Clear Lake who wrote them a nice letter, and somebody else, but would not give me any names.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/10/2011 6:46:00 PM
Please post a link to your facebook page. There are those interested just in how far and wide this has spread. Just curious.
-
Concerened Citizen 03/10/2011 6:45:00 PM
I encourage you to send every single one of your "large number of artists" to the DA's office today. Post haste. If H Gallery is in "perpetual breech of contract" with you personally, then that is a Civil case. My experience is that those who do not have a case, usually do not get a lawyer. Instead, what they do is wage a public mob lynching, then they try and force something which is Civil to be a "Criminal" case so that the burden of proof rests on the State, therefore the victim has no financial burden of proof. However, when this is discovered to be so, then the State will file charges against the victim for falsely incurring a non-criminal case. And, what is being seen here is not entirely what this article has represented. So, please, send your scam victims forth with all receipts and contracts.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/10/2011 6:40:00 PM
yourbiggestfan, I don't believe the issue is that this small group of artists may have some of their money coming to them, late perhaps, by a small business that is struggling. The issue at hand is a car that was stolen and burned, potential stalking charges, false invoices, and an organized attempt at extortion and ruin. Oh no, "yourbiggestfan" the story is much larger than a simple heist.
-
Concerned Citizen 03/10/2011 6:37:00 PM
Jonatan Lopez,
thank you for publicly admitting that H Gallery's reputation has been "ruined forever" due to the actions of some hostile, unreasonable, and disturbing actions on the part of the artists named in this article. Please come down to the DA's office and give a sworn statment to this effect and whether or not you are personally owed any money, or whether or not you are on Jim Adam's organized list. The hours are 9-5 and you may email for directions, or call the office.