One of the finest novels about American politics is Robert Penn Warren's All the King's Men, first published in 1946, the year that Bill Clinton was born in that little town called Hope.
Warren's book is built around the character of Willie Stark, the populist governor of a small, backward Southern state. Modeled on Louisiana's Huey Long, Stark starts out as a do-gooding, small-town idealist but ends up as absolutely powerful and absolutely corrupt, mercilessly destroying his enemies while bringing his state the highways and hospitals it lacked. He's nothing like Bill Clinton, the smooth conciliator, except in one respect: Stark is a man of large appetites, unbound by the conventions that govern others. All of those close to him eventually must pay for his recklessness.
The teller of Warren's tale, and the fulcrum of the moral crisis that frames the novel, is Stark's press agent, a onetime newspaperman whom the heavy-handed author named Jack Burden. He's one of Stark's fixers, and the governor assigns Burden the job of digging up dirt on one of Stark's enemies -- this was back before that task could be accomplished so easily with a well-placed leak to the media or by a special prosecutor with unbridled police powers. "There's always something," Stark tells Burden, presaging what surely must be Kenneth Starr's motto. As Burden acknowledges near the end of the book, after all is revealed, the story he's told is Willie Stark's, but it's Jack Burden's story, too.
The novel is flawed -- the twin narratives of Stark's rise and fall and Burden's search for his true father never quite fuse, and Warren lards his story with a windy philosophizing that can seem ponderous to the television-age sensibility -- but the plotting of Willie Stark's downfall is driven by the clean, solid lines of classic tragedy. Things end badly for Stark, of course --he's killed, literally, over an adulterous sexual affair. Those around him are stripped of all innocence, even the ones who thought themselves wised-up. Jack Burden survives the shipwreck, but just barely, to tell Willie Stark's story.
It was almost too easy to reach for All the King's Men after seeing Paul Begala and James Carville and the other Clinton apologists finally emerge from wherever they'd been and begin spinning furiously to save Clinton's presidency.
I'm sure they're well-paid, but loyalty is a two-way street, and for some reason I felt especially bad for Begala and Carville. I am acquainted with both men -- although I wouldn't profess to be friends with them or even really know them -- dating to their work on Lloyd Doggett's unsuccessful Senate campaign against Phil Gramm in the mid-1980s. Begala, who grew up in Missouri City and graduated from Dulles High School in Sugar Land, was then just out of UT law school, and Carville was a journeyman political consultant possessed of a personal brio not ordinarily found in practitioners of his trade.
A few years later, they worked for Fred Hofheinz's doomed comeback attempt against Mayor Kathy Whitmire, when Carville's too-real presence -- showing up at suit-and-tie affairs in his high-water jeans and black Chuck Taylor All-Stars -- was an affront to Hofheinz's chief money man, Joe Russo. Much has changed since then: Russo has served time in a federal pen, and Hofheinz has had troubles of his own, but Carville and Begala, after some successes electing Democrats outside of Texas, rose to the blue-hot center of power with Bill Clinton.
I rooted for them as they did. They are cut from a different cloth than a self-promoting sleazeball like Dick Morris: Begala always struck me as smart and unassuming, and on the public stage he's probably the most convincing of Clinton's advisers, while Carville's instincts about where the Democratic Party should be --it is always the economy, stupid -- have been and are right on the money. And I get a perverse sense of pleasure whenever I flip on a talk show and see Carville -- a guy who grew up in a speck of a town that was known in Louisiana as the home of the nation's only leprosarium -- ranting like some insane backwoods preacher.
But their most recent appearances brought to mind something I remember a perhaps more innocent Paul Begala saying -- and I remember it not because it was so brilliant or revealing, but because it was so perplexingly banal. It came after a debate between Hofheinz and Whitmire at, if I recall, South Texas College of Law, as an adrenaline-pumping Begala burst from backstage to tell the assembled media that Hofheinz's performance had been the greatest Begala had ever seen. Did he mean the greatest ever -- or just in this soon-to-be-forgotten mayoral campaign? The greatest ever, replied Begala.
Begala's experience was then somewhat limited, and I'm sure that just a few months later even Fred Hofheinz would have had trouble telling you what he did or said that was so brilliant. I remember idly wondering at the time, as I've often wondered about people who are paid to talk for and give advice to others, whether Begala just took me for a dope or actually believed his own bullshit.
Those are the only two possibilities that I could consider as I watched Carville and Begala and the other Clintonites working so hard to avoid the question and change the subject, as the story of Monica Lewinsky and the president gradually took on a plausible symmetry, fitting neatly into the pattern of evasion and cover-up that runs through Clinton's life. They hadn't, of course, asked the president the obvious questions, but they were here to assure America that there was nothing to the story, and that Clinton was getting on with the business of running the country.
"If my president says so, I believe him," is pretty much the way Carville put it to one interviewer. Imagine him -- or almost anyone else -- extending the same suspension of disbelief to Richard Nixon.
So they take us for dopes, or perhaps they truly believe their own bullshit. Either way, I hope Carville and Begala survive to tell the story: that is, the truth -- what's left when the spin will seem so banal.
As of this writing, one month into his administration, Lee "Children First" Brown is still without a permanent communications director, or whatever it is a press agent is called these days. Nonetheless, we're getting a better idea of Brown's true priorities.
As he made known after last week's Council meeting, Brown is "concerned" -- and he always seems to be either "concerned" or "outraged" about something, with no rhetorical middle ground between the reactions --over the cash-strapped Harris County Hospital District's refusal to forgo $1.4 million in potential property-tax revenues over ten years, a gift that's been deemed necessary so that private developers can put up the ReBates Hotel near the Brown Convention Center. Brown called on the district's trustees to reconsider their decision.
For once, a public body in Houston does the right thing -- doesn't bend over and grab its ankles when private interests petition to be relieved of the burdens that the rest of us bear -- and Brown is disappointed. But the giveaways that the developers have already received from the city, the county and Metro constitute a scandal of outrageous proportions, and what Brown ought to be doing is drilling any elected or appointed officials --and that's a good number of them in Harris County -- who've acceded to this scam.
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
The prime beneficiary of these subsidies is Crescent Real Estate Equities, a real estate investment trust led by Fort Worth billionaire Richard Rainwater, which was brought in as a partner with Wayne Duddlesten, the developer who apparently holds the franchise for the taxpayer-supported venue, after an earlier Duddlesten proposal collapsed.
Crescent, which as a REIT doesn't pay corporate income taxes, has the wherewithal to buy up The Woodlands and seemingly half of Houston, most recently paying $155 million to purchase a Galleria-area office complex, and it owns dozens of other office facilities, hotels and private psychiatric hospitals across the country. Now it's moved aggressively into the, ahem, "gaming" industry, paying $1.7 billion to buy some Las Vegas casinos at about the same time its Houston hotel partnership was trying to wheedle $140,000 in annual tax revenue out of an entity that provides health care to poor people in Harris County.
Lee Brown, my man, isn't there something seriously wrong with this picture? Can't wait to see what you'll do for Les Alexander.
Jim Simmon can be counseled at his online address: firstname.lastname@example.org.