Members of Commissioners Court traditionally have regarded the county treasurer in the same terms in which one thinks of one's appendix -- that is, a small, worm-shaped tube whose only apparent function is to become a big pain when it acts up.
The treasurers, on the other hand, have touted their role as fiscal watchdogs over the otherwise largely independent finances of the commissioners' precincts, though they have rarely actually challenged court members on expenditures.
Some Harris County treasurers have been more disliked than others. While the combative Nikki Van Hightower frequently clashed with commissioners, her easygoing successor, Katy Caldwell, had an uneventful one term in the office. The current occupant, Republican Don Sumners, has aggravated commissioners so much in recent months that a move is on to seek abolition of his office in the upcoming session of the Texas Legislature.
The legislator who will play point man on the effort is none other than new state senator and former county judge Jon Lindsay, no great admirer of the institution of treasurer. Lindsay confirms that he will sponsor legislation calling for a constitutional amendment eliminating Sumners's position. Proposed amendments to the constitution have to be introduced in the House first, and state Representative Debra Danburg is expected to do the honors there.
Rice University Owls Football vs. Prairie View A&M University Football
TicketsSat., Oct. 22, 2:30pm
University of Houston Cougars Football vs. UCF Knights Football
TicketsSat., Oct. 29, 11:00am
Rice University Owls Football vs. Florida Atlantic University Owls Football
TicketsSat., Nov. 5, 2:30pm
University of Houston Cougars Football vs. Tulane University Football
TicketsSat., Nov. 12, 11:00am
Sumners raised the hackles of his county colleagues by opposing the downtown ballpark and Commissioners Court's controversial tax increase. He also helped conservative activist Bruce Hotze and others craft Proposition A, the tax-limitation initiative on Saturday's city ballot -- another move that earned him the enmity of commissioners, who oppose the proposition, as well as a verbal roasting from Prop A's number one critic, Mayor Bob Lanier. On top of all that, there's the $62,000 in penalties and interest incurred when the county was late in its payment of quarterly taxes to the Harris County Appraisal District, a snafu for which Sumners denied responsibility but still caught plenty of heat.
A discussion at last week's Commissioners Court session provided some indication that, at a minimum, Commissioners El Franco Lee, Steve Radack and Jerry Eversole wouldn't mind conducting an appendectomy on the treasurer's post if the Legislature provides the scalpel. It was Radack who swung the subject around to Sumners's job after Hotze appeared before commissioners to defend Proposition A.
"There have been a number of counties in Texas that have introduced constitutional amendments that were passed to eliminate the county treasurers' offices of their counties," Radack sweetly noted. "Do you think Harris County needs a county treasurer?"
When Hotze answered in the affirmative, Lee jumped in with the observation that the treasurer's office spends $320,000 a year and employs 11 people, but "the bank can do that job just as easily."
With Lanier kibitzing from the audience, Hotze declared, "It's nice to have a watchdog," though he allowed that Lanier probably on occasion wanted to get rid of George Greanias when the mayor's archnemesis was city controller. To which Lanier snapped: "We did." But Hotze archly pointed out that, in fact, it was the city's term limits strictures, rather than Lanier, that sent Greanias to the civic sidelines.
Following the meeting, Sumners further fueled the move against him by authoring a letter to Republican precinct chairmen sniping at Lanier, Radack, Councilwoman Helen Huey and Controller Lloyd Kelley for blindly opposing Prop A.
Contacted at his office, Sumners says he was unaware of Lindsay's plans to sponsor legislation to abolish his job, but he admitted he was not surprised. In fact, Sumners cornered County Judge Robert Eckels last week and asked him whether he supported such a move. Eckels told Sumners he wasn't one of the plotters.
Sumners attributes the sudden interest in getting rid of the treasurer to his stand on the commissioners' vote to raise taxes over Eckels's opposition. "They're still smarting over my criticism of their tax increase," he maintains. "As far as I can tell, there's only four people in Harris County who weren't upset about that."
The treasurer also has a warning for Republican elected officials who support his demise: "Making an attempt to do that is an invitation to rip the local Republican Party apart." Sumners contends that such an effort would pit grassroots GOP activists who get out to vote against "what I call the establishment Republicans who bring in the money."
No matter how many enemies Sumners may have in county government, abolition of his post is far from a legislative certainty. Any attempt to mandate a statewide vote on a constitutional amendment will encounter strong opposition from the Texas Treasurers Association. Fort Bend County Treasurer Kathy Hynson, the association's legislative co-chair, says the group's vigorous lobbying arm has prevented legislation to abolish any county treasurer's post from reaching the House floor since the late eighties.
Since Harris County is the largest county with a treasurer, Hynson says the group would fight hard to prevent the job's abolition, reasoning that as Harris County goes, so goes the state.
"The treasurer is the only elected office that handles all the money that's not controlled by commissioners," says Hynson. "My attitude is we're the only people answerable to the people as far as the finances of the county goes. If you remove that, you remove any say-so from the people who vote over who's going to watch over their money."
Logic's Not In It
The most tantalizing rumor wafting on the chill January winds has Sylvester Turner shelving his mayoral ambitions, at least for the time being, to back his longtime friend and ally, Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, for the post. In return for Turner's stepping aside for Lee in the municipal arena, the congresswoman would promise to back Turner in a bid for her 18th Congressional District seat, should she be elected mayor. Aside from the state House seat Turner now holds, Lee's seat -- she represents the most liberal congressional district in the South -- is probably the one elected post Turner would have a reasonable chance of winning.
The hyperkinetic Lee, who is believed to have been born with a rare genetic condition that leaves her unable to stop campaigning for office, even while asleep, is starting her second term in Congress. She could run for mayor this year without sacrificing her congressional seat -- just as she was able to retain her at-large post on Houston City Council while campaigning to unseat Craig Washington from Congress in 1994.
The entire scenario, however, rests on one perhaps implausible assumption: that Turner has realized the lingering negative fallout from his first-round court victory over Channel 13 and reporter Wayne Dolcefino will make it difficult for him to mount a viable mayoral race.
Of course, logic rarely rules politics, but a former Turner associate dismisses the entire scenario. He believes Turner makes way too much money as a lawyer to live on a congressional salary -- an argument that's not entirely convincing, since the mayor's salary is less than a congressman's. Then there's the notion that Turner is bound and determined to run for mayor to avenge his loss to Bob Lanier in 1991, and nothing will dissuade him from running this year -- not even common sense.
The seemingly never-ending crusade by assistant district attorney Don Stricklin to nail former state district judge Lupe Salinas ended with a whimper last week, as visiting Judge Curt Steib acquitted Salinas of failing to accurately report the campaign purchase of $88 worth of flowers he gave to his wife, who served as the treasurer for the judge's campaign fund.
Steib had earlier dismissed felony perjury indictments against Salinas, a decision the district attorney continues to appeal. Stricklin had hauled the Salinas case before four grand juries in an epic two-year effort to secure indictments, but he meekly allowed the misdemeanor case to be submitted to Steib rather than exercising the state's option for a jury trial. Since Steib had earlier demonstrated a lack of sympathy for the D.A.'s case, Salinas attorney Dick DeGuerin claims Stricklin in effect tanked the final round.
"I knew they couldn't make their case, and in the last week or so before it went to trial they finally realized it too," says DeGuerin. "I think that Stricklin saw the handwriting on the wall, and it was less trouble and easier and less embarrassing to them to have it done by a judge. They can always say, 'Well, the judge is just sticking up for another judge.' "
The district attorney's pursuit of criminal charges against Salinas had already knocked him out of contention for an appointment to a federal judgeship, and doubtlessly didn't help him in his unsuccessful bid for re-election last November.
Considering the number of grand juries the D.A.'s office went through to get the indictments in the first place, perhaps Salinas should just be thankful Stricklin didn't have the option of taking his crusade to another judge or two after Steib threw the case out.
While Salinas, a former assistant district attorney, had to bear the cost of hiring his own defense lawyers to beat the D.A.'s efforts, Brett Ligon, who currently works as an assistant prosecutor, had it much easier when confronted with a lawsuit by a former schoolmate at South Texas College of Law.
Ligon and Lisa Michele Tilton-McCarthy, a clerk for U.S. District Judge Vanessa Gilmore, had been sued in state court by Jonathan Dean Sykes, who claimed the pair had falsely accused him of stalking and harassing them in statements they made to other students and South Texas staff last year.
Tilton-McCarthy hired her own attorney to defend her in the suit, but Ligon got free counsel courtesy of the D.A.'s staff attorney, Scott Durfee.
The allegations in Sykes's suit do not appear to involve Ligon's duties as an assistant district attorney, but Durfee claims that since Sykes had previously written to the D.A. challenging Ligon's behavior and qualifications for his job, he was entitled to the free taxpayer-funded representation. On that point, District Attorney Johnny Holmes agrees.
In any case, Durfee shouldn't have too much work to do on taxpayer time for Ligon, since Sykes attorney John Eikenburger says his client is going to drop his lawsuit.
Still, when it comes to legal confrontations, life seems to be easier when you're one of the D.A.'s hounds rather than one of his quarry.
The Insider awaits your New Year's tidings at 624-1483 or 624-1496 (fax), or by e-mail at Insider@houston-press.com.
Get the This Week's Top Stories Newsletter
Every week we collect the latest news, music and arts stories — along with film and food reviews and the best things to do this week — so that you'll never miss Houston Press' biggest stories.