Whistleblower Wins Suit, Even Without Feds' Help
Usually, when the federal government refuses to join in your whistleblower suit, you give up. (Unless, of course, you're talking about whistleblower suits against the federal government.)
A pair of local attorneys decided to stick with their so-called "qui tam" (legalese for "whistleblower") suit, however, and they've won it.
The hell of it is, most of the money will still end up going to the feds.
Attorneys Joel Androphy and Sarah Frazier represented a Texarkana woman who blew the whistle on her employer, Rotech Healthcare, for screwing the government via fake Medicare payments.
Battle of the Piney Woods: SFA vs. SHSU
TicketsSat., Oct. 1, 3:00pm
University of Houston Cougars Football vs. Tulsa Golden Hurricane Football
TicketsSat., Oct. 15, 11:00am
Rice University Owls Football vs. UTSA Roadrunners Football
TicketsSat., Oct. 15, 6:00pm
Rice University Owls Football vs. Prairie View A&M University Football
TicketsSat., Oct. 22, 2:30pm
The feds had already settled some similar claims with Rotech, so they declined to take part in the suit. "Ninety-nine percent of the time the government says no, the cases disappear," Androphy tells Hair Balls. (Private attorneys don't have the vast resources or the intimidating reputation of the feds.)
It was announced today, though, that Rotech has agreed to pay an additional $2 million to settle the civil charges.
Most of that goes to the federal government, but the actual whistleblower, Sheila Bell-Messier, will get 27 percent, or $540,000.
-- Richard Connelly
Get the This Week's Top Stories Newsletter
Every week we collect the latest news, music and arts stories — along with film and food reviews and the best things to do this week — so that you'll never miss Houston Press' biggest stories.