Guns are a polarizing issue in America today, but they are such an ingrained part of our culture that they can be seen in nearly every movie or television show that features crime or "action" as part of the plot. I have a nuanced view of how guns should be handled in our society, and manage to piss off friends of mine with strong views on either side of the issue, but I have enough first hand knowledge about guns to have problems with the way they are portrayed in movies.
Since firearms are part of the fabric of American culture, it follows that they would also play heavily in our entertainment, but the way guns actually function, and the effects of gun violence are so far removed from reality in many cases that I fear it spreads misconceptions. Worse still, some of the fantasies Hollywood spreads about firearms are irresponsible or potentially dangerous, or at least glamorize guns as symbols of power in ways that are probably not accurate or healthy. I'm not trying to preach to anyone, but film viewers should keep in mind that like everything we see in films, guns are not portrayed accurately a lot of the time. Here are a few of the "gun things" I hate seeing in movies.
4. Guns That Never Run Out of Ammo
Most people I know who shoot regularly spend as much or more time loading magazines and their firearms as they do actually shooting. Yet, in a lot of movies, we never really see anyone reload. I also will often see characters raining down a constant hail of lead without anything indicating they're carrying hundreds of rounds with them. Then, of course, there are the weird continuity glitches where someone with a revolver appears to fire 20 shots without reloading.This is a minor gripe, but watching some action hero firing a gun nonstop, without ever pausing to reload totally blows any suspension of disbelief I might have had. Bullets are heavy, take up space, and guns do have to be reloaded.
3. The Effects of Gun Violence Are Often Cartoonish And Exaggerated
This is a rather broad category, but most Hollywood films exaggerate the effects of a person being shot to the point of it being cartoonish. Since movies are a visual medium, this is entirely understandable from the point of view of making a huge spectacle, but it also glamorizes gun violence and isn't realistic in many cases. In past decades, the opposite was true, and most gun deaths followed a familiar template. A person suddenly clutches the area where they were shot, grimaces, and falls to the ground. No blood, usually no prolonged agony, and in the case of it being the bad guy, he was instantly dispatched. Eventually, things swung the other way, and violence became much more graphic, and now in a lot of films people shot by small caliber weapons nearly explode with huge bloody bullet hits, as if they're a human shaped water balloon filled with blood. Sure, in some cases, those results could be reasonably realistic, but not nearly as often as movies would have us believe.
First of all, a lot of bullets make relatively small entrance wounds, and rather than the explosive blood bomb effect film makers tend to use, might not bleed significantly upon impact.
Another almost universal gun violence myth that Hollywood has created is that being shot has the effect of blasting a person's body back as if it's been swatted by a giant invisible fist.
The conclusive blast of a bomb could have that effect on a person, but physics don't work that way with bullet hits. When a person is really shot, even multiple times, they typically either drop where they stand, or continue moving in the direction they were going before falling. They are not usually blown backwards as if they were suddenly yanked by a rope. Nor do they usually do the "bullet dance," a move often seen in films where a person is shot by multiple rounds and reacts to each one by jerking violently. Bullets are usually small and fast enough that they pass into a person's body without any resistance that would result in violently pushing a person back 20 feet. I personally feel that the exaggerated and unrealistic depiction of gun violence sends a bad message.