—————————————————— Doctor Who: 50th Anniversary Rewrites the Show's Future Forever | Art Attack | Houston | Houston Press | The Leading Independent News Source in Houston, Texas

Doctor Who

Doctor Who: 50th Anniversary Rewrites the Show's Future Forever

It's likely that nothing could totally live up to the expectations of the 50th anniversary of Doctor Who, and "The Name of the Doctor" in no way made everyone happy. What made it brilliant though is not what it showed, but what it promised us.

Initially, I came away from "The Day of the Doctor" focused very much on its flaws, and those flaws are legion. Are myriad at least. John Hurt turns in a fantastic performance as The War Doctor, the incarnation of the Time Lord who disavowed the name Doctor and went off to fight the last great Time War. He offers a brilliantly unique new form, being both grizzled battle veteran but also oddly cheerful and hopeful in a way that hasn't honestly been seen since Tom Baker held the part. I didn't expect to really like his Doctor as a character, but by the end I found myself hoping for more.

The problem lies in the fact that his entire existence feels forced and awkward. In every moment that The War Doctor has, you can literally feel the Eccleston-shaped hole in the story. The scars of the war that were left on The Doctor was so much a part of his portrayal, and as great as Hurt truly is in every second of the part there is a nagging feeling of him as a stand-in that no one will acknowledge.

Billie Piper is in a similar situation. She appears not as Rose Tyler, but as the embodiment of a galaxy-killing weapon's conscience that takes on the form of "Bad Wolf" Rose to reason and judge the actions of Hurt. Piper and Hurt arguably turn in the best acting in the entire special, with Piper especially stretching herself in ways that were never possible as Rose.

But again, the question is why? Why is she here except as a promise to remember how the reboot all started without that crucial missing piece? Neither she nor Hurt are wasted, far from it. They are mesmerizing at every turn, but those turns lead only to circles.

That's the hardest part of watching "The Day of the Doctor" sometimes. Where Moffat tries to cater to the past he largely ends up failing. Tennant in particular seemed to be phoning it in, the Zygons and everything involving Queen Elizabeth I felt meandering and a bit silly, and the triumphant return of all 13 Doctors to save Gallifrey leaves you steaming with a host of paradoxes that are waved away with only truly weak excuses.

If it sounds like I didn't like "The Day of the Doctor" it's because I didn't... at first. It was definitely the best multi-Doctor anniversary special, but that is generally a very low bar to clear.

You have to rewatch the episode at least once, and I mean that sincerely. There are simply too many questions being answered and asked on the first go round. There's too much to take in. That's maybe sort of the problem with 50 years of Doctor Who... there are so many rules.

Piece continues on next page.

KEEP THE HOUSTON PRESS FREE... Since we started the Houston Press, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Houston, and we'd like to keep it that way. With local media under siege, it's more important than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" program, allowing us to keep offering readers access to our incisive coverage of local news, food and culture with no paywalls.
Jef Rouner (not cis, he/him) is a contributing writer who covers politics, pop culture, social justice, video games, and online behavior. He is often a professional annoyance to the ignorant and hurtful.
Contact: Jef Rouner