Wait, you didnโt know that After Earth, the Will SmithโJaden Smith sci-fi adventure hitting theaters this weekend, is the latest from Shyamalan, he of The Sixth Sense fame and Lady in the Water infamy? Columbia Pictures has done everything in its power, in both trailers and print and TV advertisements, to hide that information.
Itโs a stunningโand, naysayers would say, deservedโreversal of fortune for the director, a former wunderkind who made his name a brand with early, pull-the-rug-out-from-under-audiences hits but who has now sunk so low that his participation in a tent-pole release is actively concealed.
In the history of cinema, itโs difficult to think of a single filmmaker with a lucrative career built on signature auteurist elements whoโs been relegated to anonymous work-for-hiredom as blatantly as Shyamalan has been here. His involvement masked from view, and his fingerprints largely wiped clean from the project, it raises the question of why Shyamalan was hired for the project if he wasnโt really wanted in the first place.
Itโs an ignominious fall for a director who was once comparedโamazingly, and by straight-faced criticsโto Hitchcock. Those proclamations were always over-the-top, far too in thrall to his patient (if portentous) framing and his gimmicky narratives, which devolved into self-parody just a couple movies in.
Defenders be damned, Shyamalan was always a one-trick pony, offering up ostensibly ordinary characters in literal and spiritual crisis whose circumstances were ultimately revealed to be far different than they initially appeared. That device grew tiresome the more times it was employed, until the director went over the edge with 2006โs Lady in the Water, a mushy fairy tale in which he cast himself as a writer with world-changing power.
That arrogant conception of himself also came through in his public persona, as when, before the release of Lady in the Water, he told Time magazine, โIf youโre not betting on me, then nobody should get money. Iโve made profit a mathematical certainty. Iโm the safest bet you got.โ
Hubris like that is destined for a correction, and after the flops of Lady in the Water and 2008โs ridiculous The Happeningโwhich aims to generate suspense from a confused-looking Mark Wahlberg and vacant Zooey Deschanel trying to flee the windโit seemed Shyamalanโs career had finally hit a wall. His response: a CG-heavy adaptation of The Last Airbender, a childrenโs anime property. While the director capably handled the elaborate, action-oriented special effects the film entailed, its horrific 3D conversion and tough-to-follow storytelling buried it at the box office in 2010. With that mainstream bid a failure, and with no one interested in enduring any more of his third-act-revelation thrillers, Shyamalanโs once-formidable career seemed as dead as Bruce Willisโs Sixth Sense protagonist. (Spoiler!)
Turning to more conventional material seems logical, and After Earth certainly fits that mold. Set 1,000-plus years in the future, it concerns the efforts of super-soldier Cypher (Will Smith) and his wannabe-badass son, Kitai (played by Smithโs own son, Jaden), to survive and come of age, respectively, after crash-landing on Earth, which was long ago deserted by humanity and is now overrun by dangerous animals.
Its milieu defined by the Avatar playbook, and predicated on a mentor-mentee father-son relationship thatโs as old as the hills, the alterna-Earth premise feels blandly safeโhardly a surprise given that the project was begat not by Shyamalan (who does get a co-screenwriting credit) but by the elder Smith, who conceived of the idea and spearheaded the production. Narrative shocks be damned, the filmโs guiding voice is its starโs, with the director relegated to that of an anonymous craftsman whose very hallmarksโlanguorous pacing, bleak color palettes and the atmospheric dread that comes from those choicesโhave mostly been discarded.
That such an approach wouldnโt fit an adventure-oriented film like After Earth is undeniable. Yet thereโs something more at work hereโa belief, by Columbia and (by extension) all of Hollywood, that Shyamalanโs defining narrative and aesthetic styles are a liability. The fact that heโs still considered a viable directorial steward for a summer spectacle may speak to his enduring craftsmanship, or perhaps the number of friendships he hasโand the wealth of favors heโs still owedโin the industry. Regardless, his absence from the marquee of After Earth remains, in a career predicated on surprises, the greatest twist so far.
This article appears in May 30 โ Jun 5, 2013.
