Some years ago, a radio station was about to switch its format. Management decided to, as they say in the business, โstuntโ for a week or so prior to the debut of their new programming lineup. Then someone came up with the idea of playing nothing but Merle Haggard all day and all night. This type of strategy was sometimes used to keep competitors guessing while simultaneously โsanitizingโ the station, easing the transition from one style of music to another.
The public was intrigued by the new approach, figuring that you could do much worse than listening to Haggard by the ton. The industry was captivated by the radio stationโs new (bogus) slogan, inspired by all-news station WINS in New York City: โYou give us 22 minutes, and weโll give you the Merle.โ
In his new biography, The Hag:ย ย The Life, Times, and Music of Merle Haggardย (445 pp. $30, Hachette Books) author Marc Eliot doesnโt get the job done in 22 minutes. More like 400 pages, plus a hefty section of notes and references. But it is an enlightening read, particularly for those who only know Haggard from his song โOkie from Muskogee.โ Eliot contends that Haggard and his band, the Strangers, effectively saved country music when it was in danger of descending into formulaic pablum.
Eliot โ a celebrity biographer who has written books about Cary Grant, Barry White, Bruce Springsteen, and Walt Disney โ takes on the legend of Haggard with an approach befitting the subjectโs stature. There is some material that might be classified as salacious, though Eliot certainly could have piled it on if he had wanted to. Itโs not like there isnโt plenty to work with.
Instead, Haggardโs life is presented chronologically, with an emphasis on his formative years and the damage that was done to his psyche during this period. Poverty, the death of his father, and multiple incarcerations gave Haggard a personality that was, to say the least, self-destructive. Repeatedly โ in both his youth and his later years โ he would get in the way of his own success.
Haggard was, politely speaking, a maladjusted child. His father died after suffering a stroke when Merle was nine years old, and the boy blamed himself, believing, as children who have endured a family tragedy sometimes do, that it was his fault. The boy had contracted a respiratory disease found in agricultural workers known as โValley Feverโ a number of weeks before his fatherโs death, and in his young mind, there was a definite connection.
This theme of misplaced responsibility runs throughout Haggardโs story. Frequently, Eliot details his subjectโs โenormous capacity for feeling guilty about things he shouldnโt and feeling no guilt for things he should.โ
During his teenage years, Haggard became a chronic truant and eventually a petty criminal. In multiple instances, Haggard would do his time, earn his release, and then promptly do something to get himself back in court. This pattern led to a series of stays in juvenile correction facilities and, later, prison. Specifically, San Quentin, the oldest prison in California and a facility that justifiably had a reputation as a place where convicts did โhard time.โ When asked by a judge why he kept sabotaging his future, Haggard said, โI donโt like being told what to do.โ
Merle Haggard on Gram Parsons: “He was a pussy.”
The young prisoner had an epiphany after seeing Johnny Cash perform on New Yearโs Day in 1960. Unfortunately, this occurred while Haggard was still in jail. He was captivated by Cashโs presence (โhe had the right attitudeโ) and resolved to become a model prisoner, with the aim of securing his parole and resuming his music career.
When Haggard was a guest on Cashโs television program in 1969, the two spoke during rehearsals, discussing Haggardโs fear of his fans finding out about his time in prison. Almost a decade after his release, Haggard still felt profound shame. Cash encouraged Haggard to โcome cleanโ about his time behind bars, and when the show aired, viewers witnessed the following exchange:
Cash: Here is a man who writes about his own life and has had a life to write about.
Haggard: Funny you mention that, Johnny.
Cash: What?
Haggard: San Quentin.
Cash: Whyโs that?
Haggard: The first time I ever saw you perform, it was at San Quentin.
Cash: I donโt remember your being in that show, Merle.
Haggard: I was in the audience, Johnny.
In relating the story of Haggardโs life, Eliot gives the reader insight into the machinations of the music business. By presenting this information, Eliot makes it easier to understand why Haggard made choices regarding his career that might be characterized as counterintuitive.
Particularly instructive is Eliotโs account of Haggardโs struggles with Capitol Records (in particular Ken Nelson, the head of the labelโs county division) during his ascent to fame during the 1960s. Haggard stubbornly fought to maintain his artistic integrity and stave off pressure to conform to the then-popular โCountrypolitanโ sound that was prevalent in Nashville.

Also instructive are the pages devoted to Haggardโs longtime relationship with Buck Owens, whom Eliot describes as possessing โthe face of a hound dog and the voice of a hiccupping angel.โ The two musicians had a largely cordial relationship, but they often functioned as frenemies. One can imagine that things were awkward when Haggard was married (for a time) to Owensโ ex-wife, Bonnie.
Eliot describes a negotiation session between the two musicians, in which the savvy Owens bought Haggardโs song โSing Me Back Home.โ Owens could be a ruthless businessman. โAs a publisher, he enjoyed making artists beg for money,โ Eliot explains. Haggard asked for $15,000, which was the amount he owed in gambling debts to the Horseshoe Casino in Las Vegas. Owens agreed, not telling Haggard that he had been prepared to give him a check made out for $35,000 that was waiting in his desk drawer.
Eliot, who has written about the Eagles and the country-rock sound that blossomed in California during the early 1970s, explores Haggardโs influence on the genre. His music was beloved by the Grateful Dead, who frequently performed โMama Triedโ and โSing Me Back Home.โ Gram Parsons of the Flying Burrito Brothers introduced the Rolling Stones to the Haggard songbook, and the lessons learned are obvious in songs like โTorn and Frayedโ and โSweet Virginia.โ
Though some rockers loved Haggard, both for his music and his persona, Eliot says that the high regard was generally not mutual. When Parsons asked Haggard to produce a record for him, the older man considered the project but ultimately bowed out. Haggard on Parsons: โHe was a pussy.โ
Nevertheless, the rockersโ love for Merle continued to flow, as exemplified by the Pure Prairie League song โIโll Fix Your Flat Tire, Merle,โ in which the narrator spies Haggard stuck on the side of the road. Itโs a two-minute blast of fanboy lust, featuring a chorus containing a unique couplet: โIโll fix your flat tire, Merle / Donโt get your sweet country picking finger all covered with erl / Youโre a honky, I know, but Merle, you got soul / And Iโll fix your flat tire, Merle.โ
Eliot writes with authority in The Hag. The text evinces a high degree of knowledge, and his insights into Haggardโs character are illuminating. Significantly, Eliot conducted over 100 new interviews in the course of writing the book. However, a reader might wonder if Eliot has ever penned scripts for true-crime television shows, or maybe MTVโs โBehind the Music.โ
Numerous chapters end in one-sentence paragraphs, lines that beg to be delivered by a stentorian announcer and then punctuated with a dramatic โbum-bum-BUUUMโ musical flourish. Case in point: โMerleโs life was about to take a deep downward plunge, and for a while, he would no longer see the light.โ Or this one: โHe hadnโt counted on the brick wall of self-destruction that stood in his way.โ Not to mention: โAnd it only got worse from there.โ
Literary melodrama aside, The Hag makes a solid case for Haggardโs status as a musical icon, an artist who exerted a powerful and lasting influence. By steadfastly returning to the inspiration provided by pioneers like Lefty Frizzell and Bob Wills, Haggard managed to stem the tide of blandness and mediocrity that, at one point, threatened to overtake the music that he loved. Or, as Eliot described Haggardโs achievement in recording the 1966 album Swinging Doors and The Bottle Let Me Down, โMerle Haggard and the Strangers had given country music back its balls.โ
This article appears in Jan 1 โ Dec 31, 2022.


