Bettencourt's Worst Argument Ever: Voters Were Misled on Drainage-Fee Vote (UPDATED With Judge's Decision)

Keep Houston Press Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Houston and help keep the future of Houston Press free.

Paul Bettencourt, the Republican who never met a government that couldn't be smaller, is in court this week leading the charge against the new drainage fees in Houston.

Voters approved the fees in a referendum, but Bettencourt, according to the Houston Chronicle, is arguing that those darn voters just didn't know what they were approving.

"If the public had known any word about a dollar sign in the referendum, it wouldn't have passed," he argued.

Beyond the matter of whether the use of the word "fee" was an extremely clever ruse to hide the fact that, well, it was a fee to be paid, Bettencourt seems to be arguing that George W. Bush should have been kicked out of office.

Voters were told he was a bipartisan "compassionate conservative" who treasured peace and abhorred "nation-building" and had a stellar career in the Texas Air National Guard during Vietnam (because through some stroke of absolute random luck, he got a highly coveted slot in that unit, preventing him from actually fighting.)

Maybe if voters were more well-informed on the matter, they might have voted differently.

Just as hilariously, Bettencourt is touting to the court a poll -- paid for by drainage-fee opponents -- that shows 65 percent of voters would not have supported the measure "had they known the City Council would grant exemptions to certain institutions, leaving others to pay the entire assessment."

Not much of a leading question at all. We're pretty sure you could finance a poll showing 65 percent of Houstonians would have opposed the fee "had they known that Christian churches and other places of worship, places which need every spare dollar to help the poor, would be charged the full fee instead of getting exemptions."

Update: And the court agrees, apparently. The judge grants the city's motion for a summary judgment.

Keep the Houston Press Free... Since we started the Houston Press, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Houston, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Houston with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the Press community and help support independent local journalism in Houston.


Join the Press community and help support independent local journalism in Houston.