We have some great commenters here on Hair Balls, and it's time we paid some damn attention to them.
So we'll be highlighting a Comment of the Day each morning or afternoon from the previous day's work. Maybe two comments, even.
This will all be determined by a highly rigorous scientific formula involving wit, clarity and whatever else we feel like at the moment.
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
We ranked Houston's 21 full-time sports-talk personalities from worst to first.
It generated some response, to put it lightly.
Joseph Choeng wrote:
a few observations.
Matt Jackson: would be much more credible if his opinions were built on reasoning. He shoots from the hip, is rarely more informed than callers, and is routinely squashed - and rightfully so - by Lance and Adam, who are much more intelligent and informed.
idiots on ESPN at noon: one is a degenerate gambler who can't get over his mid-life crisis entry into the WSOP. My theory still sticks: any "poker player" who discusses his game as much as this a-hole is masking insecurities and leaks in his play. I also played in the WSOP when I turned 40, but I don't feel the need to tell the whole world about it on a regular basis. Also, his weak play is evidenced by his wearing of headphones and shades at the table: amateur hour. The other dude: frat boy who needs to haul his ass back to Austin and stay there. Aside from these points, these fools do know sports.