Some Judicial Action In Those Bad-Faith Worker's-Comp Insurance Cases

Keep Houston Press Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Houston and help keep the future of Houston Press free.

In 2008 we wrote about the problems with Texas Mutual Insurance, a company accused of bad-faith dealings with people who had filed worker's comp claims through them.

Two recent court actions have advanced things a bit, including what could be an important showdown at the Texas Supreme Court.

The first action was a ruling from the Fifth Court of Appeals in Dallas, remanding a case where a district judge had penalized TMI for altering hospital records (details here). The appeals court said the summary judgment granted was excessive improper.

Given the long-standing enmity between TMI and the lawyers handling the cases we wrote about, it's perhaps not surprising that they have exceedingly different interpretations of the court's action.

"We are delighted, but not surprised, that the Court of Appeals recognized Texas Mutual's good faith and overturned the district court's judgment against our company," Mary Barrow Nichols, general counsel and senior vice president for Texas Mutual, said in a prepared release. "We were confident that we handled this case appropriately and that the appellate court would fully vindicate the company, as it has done."

Plaintiffs attorney Mike Doyle says the appeals court "didn't exonerate" TMI or its lawyers. "They didn't find that they didn't alter the records," he said. "They kind of dodged that question and said that what the trial court did was give the wrong penalty."

The case goes back to the trial judge to hash out.

Perhaps a bigger move, Doyle says, was a decision last week by the Texas Supreme Court to hear oral arguments in a different worker's-comp case against TMI. In that case, he says, the insurer is asking for immunity from all bad-faith claims against it. (Pretty nice immunity, if you can get it.)

"It's been sitting in the Supreme Court for 15 or 16 months, but now they have decided to hear oral arguments on it," he says.

Those arguments are scheduled for April 14.

The Texas Supreme Court doesn't exactly have a reputation for being on the side of insureds when they take on insurance companies, but we guess having a hearing is better than being in limbo.

Keep the Houston Press Free... Since we started the Houston Press, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Houston, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Houston with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the Press community and help support independent local journalism in Houston.


Join the Press community and help support independent local journalism in Houston.