The Weird World of Civil Forfeiture

Keep Houston Press Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Houston and help keep the future of Houston Press free.

In a Harris County District Clerk's Office, there sits a case known as The State of Texas v. One 2004 Chevrolet Silverado. The case was disposed of in 2011, with the Chevy in question being found guilty.

You may wonder how an inanimate object can be sued. It's all a part of a process known as civil forfeiture, a peculiar remedy that allows state and federal authorities to seize property they believe were used in the commission of -- or are the fruits of -- a crime. The property can be anything (there's a Harris County forfeiture lawsuit against some jewelry, for example) but mostly involves cash and vehicles.

These actions play out in civil court, independent of any criminal charges. In fact, a person doesn't have to even be charged with a crime for the authorities to go after his loot. If the state wins, the proceeds are shared among local law enforcement agencies. And it's this practice, critics say, that gives the government a perverse incentive; a sort of license to shake down people who don't have the resources or inclination to fight back.

Prosecutors and police maintain that civil forfeiture is an effective crime-fighting tool. But some high-profile instances of abuse of the law have helped swell the ranks of those calling for the law to be modified or completely dismantled.

Leading the rallying cry against Texas's civil forfeiture law is the Virginia-based Institute for Justice, whose lawyers have taken on the case of a man embroiled in a civil forfeiture dispute. His name is Zaher El-Ali, and he's the man who claims to be the owner of the aforementioned Chevy Silverado. Using El-Ali as a sort of test case, the Institute challenged the very constitutionality of the civil forfeiture law. After striking out in district court, they pleaded their case before a panel of judges on the 14th Court of Appeals. The case is pending.

It turns out, for reasons explained in this week's story, "Texan Challenges Civil Forfeiture Law," that the Institute of Justice may have picked the wrong case to champion. But the Institute has certainly succeeded in spreading awareness of an unusual law that challenges traditional notions of jurisprudence.

Keep the Houston Press Free... Since we started the Houston Press, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Houston, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Houston with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the Press community and help support independent local journalism in Houston.


Join the Press community and help support independent local journalism in Houston.