The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals today upheld the second conviction of a Lufkin man in the gruesome stomach-stomping deaths of his girlfriend’s unborn twin fetuses.
Attorneys for Gerald Flores, now 22, argued that a recent Texas law that applies capital murder charges to the killing of a fetus was unconstitutional, in part because it has a religious and not a secular purpose. (Flores had told authorities in 2004 that he and his 16-year-old girlfriend decided to terminate her pregnancy by having Flores step on her stomach. For more on the case, read our story here.)
But in her opinion, reflecting the Court’s unanimous decision, Presiding Judge Sharon Keller wrote, “Mere consistency between a statute and religious tenets, however, does not render a statute unconstitutional. Otherwise, no law against theft or murder could pass constitutional muster, because those laws are consistent with religious strictures such as the Ten Commandments.” Go here for the entire opinion. – Craig Malisow
Keep the Houston Press Free... Since we started the Houston Press, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Houston, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Houston with no paywalls.