To the Staff of the Journal News,
When I read recently about how a gun owner published the names and addresses of many of you on a Web site in retaliation for you publishing the names and addresses of gun owners in your area, I have to admit my first reaction was, "Sucks to be you."
I should note that I am not a gun owner, nor do I intend to be. I do not advocate lax gun restrictions. In fact, I am a strong believer in good gun control laws as was my father, despite the fact he was a hunter and a gun owner. That being said, what you did in outing people who were not doing anything illegal would have been only mildly interesting if you had done it for legitimate journalistic reasons, but I think you had an ulterior motive.
Like most newspapers, I'm sure you are feeling the pinch that comes with reduced ad rates and declining revenues from online advertising. One way to help bolster your numbers is to increase hits to your Web site, and congratulations, because you certainly did that. And, let's be honest, wasn't that really the point?
Why else would you decide to equate people who went through every legal channel to acquire a weapon with lunatics and criminals? It would be like outing registered Democrats or Republicans. It would be like outing people who apply for permits to open businesses or get married or divorced. But none of those would have gotten you hits because no one cares who decided to open a deli or divorce his wife of 20 years. But they definitely care who is carrying a gun, particularly after the tragedy in Connecticut.
To be honest, I've always been uncomfortable with the outing of criminals as a means of warning people against their existence. The branding of someone with the dreaded scarlet A needs to be done with great care and respect for the problems it creates. There are far too many instances of people on the sex offender list who are guilty of nothing more than being a 19-year-old who slept with a 16-year-old, or those who were wrongfully accused.
There are very good reasons to warn citizens of the dangers around them and carefully curated lists of criminals can be tremendously beneficial. But, a high and mighty rundown of people who did absolutely nothing wrong is the kind of demonization no one needs.
So when someone who wasn't on your list, but does own a gun, decided to fire back with a list of his own, I can honestly say I felt no sympathy for you. I guess I feel somewhat bad for the people who weren't involved in the decision-making process. I'm sure some copy editor is thinking, "Damn, man, I don't control what the bosses do." But, just as Newton theorized, "Every stupid action has an equally stupid reaction."
And please don't go whining about how someone used your tactic against you like your colleagues on CNN did when they brought the guy who did it on to discuss his story. All's fair in love AND war, as the saying goes.
Next time you decide to go and do something stupid with technology, try to remember that there are lots of people out there just as smart if not smarter than you. Entire corporations have felt the wrath of organizations like ANONYMOUS.
But, my guess is you got exactly what you wanted: attention.
Keep the Houston Press Free... Since we started the Houston Press, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Houston, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Houston with no paywalls.