Uber Agrees to Stay in Houston Through Super Bowl...Then What?

Keep Houston Press Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Houston and help keep the future of Houston Press free.

Mayor Sylvester Turner announced Wednesday what is likely to be a major relief to the city's thousands of Uber users: At least through the Super Bowl, Uber has promised not to leave.

As part of the compromise, Uber will agree to continue requiring fingerprint background checks for drivers (which it has been fighting for months, saying it's too onerous and redundant). On the city's end, officials will lower the costs of licensing from $200 to $70, cut the licensing process in half for drivers and ensure they can get licensed in under 20 minutes. That means no more physical exams for drivers, and no more drug tests unless there is probable cause.

“I am thrilled we can finally put this issue to rest and focus on the real task at hand — providing a great Super Bowl experience that shows off our city,” Turner said. “We’ve crafted a proposal that reduces the length and cost of a driver application but still protects public safety. This is a win for drivers and passengers alike."

Turner also announced a new transportation app, called Arro, that will operate similar to the way Uber does but for taxis. In the coming months, Turner said, limos and wheelchair-accessible vehicles will also be available on Arro; collaborations with Metro are also a possibility.

You might want to give it a download, because from the sounds of the "compromise" between Uber and the city, Uber's future in Houston still seems pretty uncertain.

Uber's terse, two-sentence statement seems to emphasize not once, but twice that this compromise extends "through the Super Bowl." Asked what happens after the Super Bowl, an Uber spokesperson told us the city's changes in regulations were a step forward — but still out of line with what the rest of the country was doing.

That's because Uber has consistently maintained that the fingerprint background check is simply unnecessary, and only complicates the licensing process. Uber uses a private service for national background checks. Turner, on the other hand, has refused to budge, saying the fingerprinting is necessary for public safety reasons.

The solution to the kerfuffle appears to lie in the Legislature: Earlier this week, Senator Charles Schwertner (R-Georgetown) filed a bill proposing that the state regulate ride-share companies like Uber instead of individual cities.

Nowhere in his bill do fingerprint background checks appear.

Keep the Houston Press Free... Since we started the Houston Press, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Houston, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Houston with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the Press community and help support independent local journalism in Houston.


Join the Press community and help support independent local journalism in Houston.