Although I am not particularly concerned with losing weight, I had made it a habit to opt for diet sodas, flavored sparkling water, and reduced calorie juices when making my own casual mixed drinks. (When going out, however, I always go for the real, good stuff.)
My theory, which is not completely without merit, was that the additional sugar (on top of the alcohol) put you at even greater risk for dehydration and set you up for a nasty hangover. I based this hypothesis not so much on all those pesky premed classes I had to take in college, but, um, all the mornings after I drank saccharine Midori cocktails and trashcan punch (also in college). And, I thought, it didn't hurt to shave a hundred calories or so off that margarita by using a light mixer.
But people with more degrees than me and using much larger sample sizes found otherwise. Sugary mixers may pack on pounds in the long term, but in the short-term have the (arguably positive) effect of retarding alcohol's impact on your system.
We Believe Local Journalism is Critical to the Life of a City
Engaging with our readers is essential to the mission of the Houston Press. Make a financial contribution or sign up for a newsletter, and help us keep telling Houston’s stories with no paywalls.
Support Our Journalism
I am not a rocket surgeon, but the summary of their findings and their reasoning does make sense to me. But I still maintain that I feel better after two whiskey sours made with light mix than two made with a full-calorie version. I mean, let's be clear: I feel pretty good regardless after two drinks, but in the former situation this feeling extends to the next morning.
Readers, please weigh in with your own personal anecdotes. Do you (unlike some of the official test subjects) feel drunker after having light rather than full-calorie cocktails? Or is this all fuss about sugar vs. sugar-free obscuring the greater issue, namely that people won't get fat or feel shitty if they just drink less?