For a brief period in high school, I embraced vegetarianism. Well, pescatarianism, actually, because I allowed myself tuna melts (my mom made really good ones). I was clearly not cut out for this lifestyle, however, given that I ended up simply replacing the animal flesh foods I once enjoyed (chicken nuggets, hamburgers) with highly processed versions made with meat replacements. Those substitutions certainly weren't much healthier or more environmentally friendly.
After a few months, I gave up my pescatarian diet (I think this might have happened exactly the day before Thanksgiving), but in the years following, I've occasionally tried eating vegetarian or even vegan for a few days or weeks. Placing limitations on my diet forces me to evaluate my (sometimes bad) eating habits and prompts me to fall in love with new dishes. Case in point, "beetloaf".
Recently, I have been considering going vegan again for a short period of time. Not because I feel bad about eating foie gras. Not because I want to eat more vegetables. Because, rather, I have become absolutely fascinated with Beyond Meat.
This start-up has received significant attention for the way in which it's innovating the production of plant-based meat substitutes. What Beyond Meat claims to do better than any other player in the market is create faux flesh (i.e., "chicken" strips) foods whose texture is nearly identical to that of the real thing.
The major selling point, it seems then, is not just that it's more affordable than meat (currently the majority of their products are less expensive per pound than the animal flesh equivalent) but that you can't tell the difference.
That's terrific for people who for health reasons can't eat meat or who are understandably disgusted with the factory farming in this country or who recognize that eating animals is not particularly good for planet Earth. Or all of the above, because in my personal experience, most long-term vegans acknowledge all three reasons as motivations for their consumption practices.
But what about those who embrace the vegan lifestyle because they don't think it's just/right/fair/defensible for one animal species (humans) to prioritize its existence over the existence of all other animal species? Those people (and sometimes I count myself as one of them) who don't believe that human needs and desires should always already take precedence over those of other living things?
For those vegans, I don't understand why it would be appealing to engage even in a masquerade of animal consumption. The material degree of separation between eating chicken, for example, and eating something that resembles chicken is not, I think, great enough to render the inherent immorality of the original act (if you think it's a problem).
For readers of this blog, you know I obviously don't [think eating animals is always and necessarily immoral]. So I can't speak for vegans and vegetarians who do subscribe to this ethos.
But if you do, and you're reading, let me know how you feel about Beyond Meat.
Keep the Houston Press Free... Since we started the Houston Press, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Houston, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Houston with no paywalls.