Top

music

Stories

 

Going Viral

The infestation of classic-rock threatens the cultural legacy of an entire generation and must be stopped.

A virus is currently spreading among today's young people. Like swine flu, it has made life extremely unpleasant for many, but unlike the H1N1 strain, it is exclusively passed between old and young. If left unchecked, it could have the far-­reaching effect of rendering an entire generation between ages 20 and 40 culturally stagnant.

Classic rock can be a real Highway to Hell.
Photo illustration by John Sweeney
Classic rock can be a real Highway to Hell.

It can't be prevented with a face mask — although earplugs would be a step in the right direction — but what's most tragic is that the young are enthusiastically welcoming it into their homes, cars and iPods. Even, after a few shots, into their karaoke parties.

This infestation is called classic rock, and it needs to be stopped.

Back when your folks were young, do you think they were listening to their dad's Benny Goodman and Glenn Miller records? Hell no. They were forging their individualism through Janis Joplin and the Beatles, Bob Dylan and the Rolling Stones.

Their music fit the times; it was fun to smoke weed and drop acid to, and it bled into their politics, art and literature. Yeah, it could be reductive and corny, but it was theirs.

Then they grew up and got into cocaine and facial hair, but still liked to party. They picked up AC/DC and Rush LPs, maybe a little Electric Light Orchestra now and then. These new jams may not have been saving the world, but they were expanding consciousness, and again, it was theirs.

Yet somehow, all these years later, hippie, prog and arena rock still dominate the guitar-based non-country airwaves. According to recent figures from New Hampshire-based trade publication Inside Radio, there are 485 classic-rock stations in the U.S., compared to 171 modern-rock stations (Slipknot, Linkin Park), 369 adult-alternative rock stations (Death Cab for Cutie, David Byrne) and 312 rock stations (Metallica, Van Halen). Meanwhile, moldy old-timers like Bruce Spring­steen, the Eagles and Neil Diamond dominated the list of top-grossing 2008 concert acts.

Young people who subsist on classic rock are traitors to their contemporaries. The flower children had their time in the sun, and it's frankly rather sick that we're still worshipping their musical icons. And we can't go blaming Clear Channel for people's shitty taste, either, as so many stoned media-studies majors are wont to do.

"If only the corporate radio suits would stray from the formula," they cry, American Spirit cigarettes ashing onto their ironic beards, "the American cultural landscape would radically transform — overnight! — into a diverse mecca of sounds and styles."

The fault lies with the lazy listeners. As our baby-boomer parents head into retirement, we're taking over as the dominant consumers of media, and listening to the same crap they did — and do. According to Cathy Devine, vice president of Research for Inside Radio, our age group is an essential slice of classic-rock radio's target demographic. She adds, anecdotally, that we appear to constitute a significant percentage of its concert attendees as well.

Don't get me wrong, anyone without a working knowledge of Blonde on Blonde and Rumours is missing out. But the 1,500th listen to "Start Me Up" really should involve grown men crying. Our generation has no lack of quality artists, but the vast majority of us are too lazy to seek them out.

Think of it this way: Probably every other person sharing your WiFi connection at the coffee shop right now knows the lyrics to "You Shook Me All Night Long," but how many of them can sing along with a single song by My Morning Jacket, TV On The Radio, Joanna Newsom, Of Montreal or any of the other best rock artists of our era?

There are plenty of places to find ­cutting-edge music, often for free. Besides left-of-the-dial radio stations, there are Web-based and satellite radio, mp3 sites and plenty of others. Members of the so-called Internet age have no excuse for listening to classic rock other than sheer brainwashing from our parents — the same people who ruined our economy and are on the way to bankrupting Social Security, don't forget.

Still, like zombie sheep stoned on homegrown, we shell out $100 for Neil Young tickets; meanwhile, compelling local bands are playing down the street for the cost of a pint of Lone Star.

This is generational warfare, and we're losing. So let's fight back. Turn off the Jethro Tull. Walk out of dinner parties where the host puts Heart on the stereo. Bolt at the mere mention of foxy ladies.

Huey Lewis be damned, let's drive a stake through the heart of classic rock and roll until it is no longer beating. Stop kickin' down the cobblestones and, for God's sake, stop feeling groovy.

 
  • B Miranda 12/04/2009 11:08:00 PM

    Ah! Another disgruntled youth! My, My, My how original. For your info, not so experienced one, the classic rock generation, which I am one of, did listen to our parents music, like Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, Benny Goodman, Etc. Their TV shows were extremely popular, as were their movies with the youth! Most of the music in the fifties & early sixties produced by young Artists was written & pre recorded by Artists from the 30�s & 40�s. Radio stations in the fifties & sixties played a variety of Artists spanning both generations. Groups like Chicago & Blood Sweat & Tears wrote their music inspired by early big band groups, early Jazz Artists & Blues Artists. This is the reason these groups are still revered today, because they practiced, practiced, practiced, until they were able to play their instruments professionally. They pay'd attention, they picked up well what they heard from these early Artists & they applied what they learned to their music so well, it still affects people today. The so called Artists now days are spoiled, they don�t learn well, they�re lazy, they don�t want to work hard at being their best & they just don�t give a damn! It cry's of the lazy ass tech society we live in of the entitled. They have no emotions, so they�re music is void of it (something that�s a very important element in music & humans) they have no idea how to properly compose a song. They have no respect for the older generation, they�re cocky, bad mannered smart asses to sum it up very tidy. If my generation would have had that attitude, you wouldn�t have had the privilege of hearing any great music!! There is an old saying, which I�m sure you don�t want to hear, (which is most of your generations problem) & it says; �If you can�t do it as well or better, then it�s not worth doing�. Your generation thinks it can throw together some emotionless crap it calls music & everybody should like it, want it & respect it. I think your finally learning otherwise & you just don�t like it. People, no matter what age, want to hear great music & your generation is just not producing it! Why don�t you just call that crap your generation so wrongly calls Rock, the crap it really is, hard core, emotionless, bad attitude punk music. There is nothing within it even remotely connected to real Rock��.Was this helpful junior? Wes

  • David Rozycki 08/05/2009 1:48:00 AM

    Stupid article. There is no great rock music being made by any new artists in 2009. It's not the listeners fault. Its funny also if a young kid only listens to new music you critics will put him down for not knowing any of the history of rock, if he likes classic rock then he gets put down like in this stupid article.

  • Soledad 07/05/2009 8:41:00 PM

    http://www.myspace.com/daylightcomaofficial

  • Daba 06/23/2009 8:59:00 PM

    If we have the ears and the inclination, someday in the very near future we will all be old enough to realize that everything we listen to came through everything our folks listened to and everything they listened to came through their folks and so on and so on. Music is ever a distillate of what has been before (thank Heaven). You sound gutsy enough to take the challenge to peek outside of what is being currently proffered as substantial music now or even twenty-five years ago. Music is a marker for the times and everyone is entitled to his preference. However, I look forward to hearing what you say about this twenty years from now. Kindest Regards...

  • TLW 05/31/2009 6:30:00 AM

    Zep's comment(#19) was very good ,but incomplete. You can blame the listeners and technology. I've sold music for 20 yrs and a key difference is there's no filter anymore. As you pointed out- record companies used to develop artists & they had more bites at the apple.Proven acts really proved themselves over time.First you had fill venues to show potential and earn a contract. Today-anyone with a computer can make some noise and put it out there. This just makes it harder to find the true gems that we may never hear. Songs became hits because they sold(45's,cass,cds) nationwide and became a national experience(the Twist,British Invasion,Motown Sound,Disco,New Wave,Grunge,etc.).The music was celebrated with a sense of community. The current music fan celebrates his music secluded away from others(Old school 3ft speakers or Boombox vs. Ipod).Today's music has been devalued to a free download when you buy a Pepsi.In the past,when you REALLY NEEDED THAT SONG,you would spend hard-earned money for it. Now it's too easy to get it for free and it has less importance and thus less social impact.If everyone could get a 46" Plasma TV for $100,they would not so cool anymore. God bless us all on the eternal search for good music; no matter when it was recorded!!

  • roger 05/23/2009 7:11:00 AM

    It comes in cycles. I remember thinking how foolish my friends were for buying Door's and Led Zepplin albums when I was a kid. That wasn't my music, it was someone elses. My very first CD was Camper Van Beethoven. However I go to the mall or to festivals today and see young kids with Nirvana T-shirts and think those kids are just as bad as my friends that wore t-shirts with Jim Morrisons face on it when I was young. I want to tell those kids, that was my music, get your own. Find your own stars and voice. Nirvana and Pearl Jam are played on "The Buzz" constantly, but those albums are nearing 20 years old now. The issues Eddie Vedder and Kurt Kobain were confronting when they wrote their music may be universial but it also dated. But keep the faith, the cool kids will always find the new stuff. There is hope for Animal Collective, TV On The Radio, and the like.

  • jesse 05/20/2009 7:13:00 PM

    I think if there were more enduring acts now we'd be in better shape. No one on terrestrial radio will take the chance. Classic rock sells. I think most kids are smart enough to find the new music, but also embrace the classic.

  • Josh 05/20/2009 5:46:00 AM

    Fuck current music. I was in high school in 1999-2003, and I hated my generation. I hated Jay-Z, Blink 182, Eminem, Britney Spears, Avril Lavinge, Coldplay, Slipknot, and Alicia Keys. So I sought refuge in classic heavy metal. Ozzy, Metallica, and Iron Maiden. Want to know how much my parents had to do with that? Zero. At best, I only have three artists in common with my parents, Bob Marley, Van Morrison and The Beatles. Now that I think about it, I'm not sure I'd even be into metal if my parents liked it, I'd probably be too weirded out. Don't want to hear "Start Me Up" for the millionth time? Don't listen to Classic Rock radio. And who cares if our culture has an identity or not?

  • keith 05/19/2009 10:55:00 PM

    I've noticed some indie bands (names which I cannot remember)are really experimenting with that classic 70's sound. Luckily, its fresh and not annyoing....so far.

  • Zep 05/17/2009 5:15:00 AM

    The author is laying the blame in the wrong place (the listeners). The author needs a history course on the executive side of the industry (not the performance side). The problem lies in the record companies highest levels and has trickled down to the bottom for about 25 years. The change came in the eighties when the companies were taken over at the top by people with business experience, not music experience. In the 60's & 70's, the acts were given contracts for many albums and given time to develop. First album didn't sell? No problem, Ahmet Ertegun believes you have it and will give you time to prove it. How has it been for the past twenty? One to two record contracts renewable only if you go platinum. How has this affected radio? Executives of the same mentality own the stations. Why does Pearl Jam continue to get dismissed when it dominated the radio in the '90's and the current material is better than ever? Have you heard Heart's "Jupiter's Darling" album from a few years ago? Their best album and not far from the early year's output in sound and quality. Why don't these get airtime? Because these new songs are not proven money makers. Why gamble with the latest Pearl Jam when "Jeremy" has already proven to make money for us? So the trickle down works like this: No time given for artist development leads to the disappearance of promising artists intertwined with radio executives not willing to replace money makers with new songs that are gambles so radio stays stagnant promoting long term artists that are bankable.

  • Cat Eyes 05/17/2009 2:06:00 AM

    My God! What a narrow minded idiot you are! Could it be you are a Nazi? When I was a young girl in the 60s I was exposed to all kinds of music from classical, big band era, 50�s, Spanish, 60�s & 70�s and I embraced it all! My fav era is still the 60�s garage/psychedelic rock with early 70�s right behind it. The underground of the 80�s cannot go unmentioned either. I think new bands like Millionaire, SotoSoundz, TCTC are innovative, original and very much worth mention to this generation thirsty for something different! Keep an open mind embrace the new. Good music is out there. And thank God classic rock will ALWAYS be there too�stone free to do as I please! Ha!

  • francis ten 05/17/2009 1:20:00 AM

    great article

  • Guy Parent 05/16/2009 9:30:00 PM

    You just can't stand the notion of happiness and harmony anywhere, can you? It's no surprise that mankind is an endangered species thanks to such maliciously motivated propaganda like this going on.GP.

  • Nick Keppler 05/16/2009 9:11:00 PM

    I also really enjoyed this piece. I have to ask though: What happened to the middle, great artists around from, say, 1980 to 2000? A few, like Nirvana and Radiohead, get their due, but the best stuff by Jane�s Addiction, REM, Smashing Pumpkins, Massive Attack, Oasis, The Verve, Jeff Buckley, Tori Amos, Pearl Jam and the Red Hot Chili Peppers stands up nicely to anything gobbling up airtime on classic or modern rock stations. There aren�t many radio stations where you can hear these bands, and unfortunately their audience isn�t expanding much past the people who grew up on them.

  • jason 05/16/2009 4:53:00 AM

    Classic Rock has such a HUGE library of quality material that many many people still love and thankfully still is loved by the younger generations. The quality of song writing and the sound of classic records are far better than most records being made today in my opinion. The way records are made today and promoted is drastically different than they were in the 60's, and the 70's. As I am writing this "I'm Amazed" by My Morning Jacket is playing. I've never heard of them until your article but Ben, they sound pretty good. Thanks! Worth shattering my ACDC records over? Not at all! Smash 2112 for Joanna Newsome? No way. Smash Abbey Road for TV on The Radio? Lord NO! Of Montreal.. Naah... Although I might take some of what they're smoking! All these bands have something to offer to somebody but not fair to them to put them on the playing field with Benny Goodman, Rush, ACDC, Joplin, Beatles, Dylan, and ELO. I know where you were attempting to go with it but those musicians are not quite up to par with the older ones you mentioned and they are certainly not cutting edge rock bands of our day! The Jackets guys are pretty good though. Fact is is that those classic bands set the bar pretty high back in the day and modern record making by in large has not kept pace.

  • ttyler5 05/16/2009 2:49:00 AM

    You are THERE, man! That CR@P was bad enough when I was a kid, and they embalmed it all on 33&1/3rpm platters and 8 track tapes the size of netbooks! Neil Young, the Beatles, Mick Jagger, the Eagles --- all those wrinkled old farts are ready for drool buckets and diapers! The ones who are still wheezing, anyway! I say yeah, unplug the life support, pull out the feeding tubes, and turn off the iron lung machines!

  • Cousin Chris 05/15/2009 10:26:00 PM

    Really enjoyed this piece. There are a lot of reasons for older music continuing to dominate radio and arenas, but I think part of it is that these acts have been established as legends and younger musicians are still in the process of earning their credibility. There is a lot to say for being prolific and creating a large catalog of quality music. One of the problems with the current music scene is that bands blow up, i.e. The Strokes, Franz Ferdinand, but they don't have that much to back it up with after the first album or two and that is frustrating for music fans who tout these bands and then watch their subsequent albums decrease in originality. I think the shift is on though. Your typical college student will put on an MGMT album at a party years before a classic rock album. They probably did not pay for the album though and there in lies the entire problem.....

  • Patrick 05/15/2009 8:25:00 PM

    Who are you? This is foolish rag shag. And you're an idiot. I am this generation.

  • tdneel 05/15/2009 3:17:00 PM

    You have a point, but people listen to what they like. And a good song is a good song, no matter how old it is.

  • Flash 05/15/2009 2:46:00 PM

    Let's face it, your comparing a '57 Chevy to a K-car.

  • Steve 05/15/2009 1:10:00 AM

    Of Montreal is pretty cool. I like some of their songs, but only some. That's the case with most modern music I appreciate. Contrastingly, I like 5-10+ albums from Pink Floyd, Rush, and Black Sabbath. Not every song has to have a catchy melody, because the music itself is good. Who can say that for Slipknot, Limp Bizkit, Korn, or any other guitar based modern rock played on the radio? Would you even notice the difference if you switched the guitarists out? I will grant you one thing: There's an unbelievable array of metal these days. Communic, Dream Theater, Kalmah.. it's great. The stuff I'm being force-fed, though? No way.

  • James 05/15/2009 12:03:00 AM

    Slipknot sucks.

  • Walker 05/14/2009 11:51:00 PM

    It's what they're familiar with. Radio does not play the diversity it used to, it does not support up-and-coming artists. Kids are listening to new music over the Internet, and these bands may have 1,000,000 fans - but from 150 countries and they can't fill an arena in any given city. Clubs don't pay anymore because people are usually hesitant to see a band they haven't heard of or that the club won't advertise and radio won't talk to. Cover bands can't exactly make a living covering songs no one has ever heard or is tired of hearing. You've also missed a point. Up to this generation people went out to do things they didn't normally do; drink, smoke, have fun. You can't afford the drinks anymore so ya can't go out very often, no one lets you smoke, so, well, let's find somewhere else to have fun. Meanwhile, "hey I know this song, this is a good band!" and Classic rock will continue to flourish.

  • the_birds 05/14/2009 11:00:00 PM

    The problem is multi-fold. Clear Channel plays classic rock, because they are cold corporate morons, who treat music as strictly a product. They won't bank on a change in the paradigm for the future. Typical corporate America, no long term plan. As a veteran of Internet Radio for more than 10 years, let me tell you, its hard as hell to convince people to do their listening on the web. Not to mention there is the "geek factor." Some Gen Xers really don't have a geek gene. There aren't many people in this country who are into as much new rock out there as I am. I'll do you all a service, I'll give you the product of years of hard won internet radio listening goodness, the stations you need to listen to if you want to know what today's great music is. Like so many great things from England, try BBC 6, probably the best station in the world, seriously. Stateside, its woxy.com, unbeatable for variety. Something I've discovered recently is JJJ (Triple J) from Australia. Now you know, no more excuses. Get to work and support these good touring acts, bonus it will be about 75% cheaper for concert tickets!

  • Nick Danger 05/14/2009 1:02:00 AM

    Yeah, great local bands play down the street and I buy their tickets too......and i wouldnt hesitate to shell out $100+ bucks for Neil Young either.....in 31 years of going to his shows hes never given less than the money's worth...and Ive caught a lot of bar nads that werent worth the cost of a pint.....

  • Tim 05/14/2009 12:12:00 AM

    The name 'classic' usually means that there is some real substance there, moreso with music. Perhaps it is 'classic' because it has stood the test of time. Maybe it is classic because it actually has structure, harmony, melody and a craft to the writing. Then again, maybe it is classic because newer listeners are lazy, and call anything that is blues-based rock, or done in 4/4 time, 'classic rock'. True, radio stations are appalling and no one need to hear "Free Bird" again, or "Bad Company"...or especially "Layla". They are more cancerous than the music you cite. Likewise, just because newer bands are lazy, untalented or whatever it may be, throwing three random words to use as a band name and saying you dig Bowie...well, it just don't cut it. Put up or shut up. Most acts these days are just taking up space. Their music will be as easily forgotten as their personas. No one liked it when Coke changed, they had a staple, a solid product. Don't fault 60's and 70's era bands for having inventive, yet solid goods.

  • Rosie 05/13/2009 10:04:00 PM

    Your generation's music is nothing new. Other than some catchy "off the wall" names for bands, your generation's musicians channel the "old masters" in their work that's worth a darn. The rest is trash. For every "successful" new band there is a distinct and ever present style that can be attributed to an artist of the "classic rock" genre. Our musicians forged a pathway into music that has and will stand the test of time. Our generation was one of the most enlightened of the 20th century (the "Flappers" were fairly enlightened, also) and unafraid to be individuals. Our generation produced leaders in the music industry that are still unchallenged in their abilities. Sorry, but your generation has a long way to go. And what's so bad about feeling groovy...it's better than pretending to feel nothing.

  • mark 05/13/2009 6:57:00 PM

    Your generation's music is not memorable. It is already consigned to the ash heap of history. The Beatles, Neil Young and the like have and will continue to stand the test of time. They know how to perform, play and entertain -- triple threats. So many of the new bands can't even master one of those three ingredients.

 

Most Popular Stories

Find a Concert

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy