| Fashion |

Vogue Joins Movement to Ban Underweight, Underage Models from Fashion Images

Keep Houston Press Free
I Support
  • Local
  • Community
  • Journalism
  • logo

Support the independent voice of Houston and help keep the future of Houston Press free.

Banning the use of models under the age of 16, and/or those who appear to have an eating disorder, isn't exactly breaking news, but Vogue's announcement that they are jumping on board and adopting this policy themselves certainly is. Yesterday afternoon the magazine's publisher, Condé Nast International, announced that editors of the 19 Vogue magazines worldwide have agreed to "not knowingly work with models under the age of 16 or who appear to have an eating disorder."

Vogue is the latest, but arguably the most high-profile and influential player in fashion, to take this stand. In 2007, the Council of Fashion Designers of America (CFDA) adopted age minimums and healthy working environments after two young models died from complications believed to stem from eating disorders. Condé Nast's official statement reads:

"Vogue believes that good health is beautiful. Vogue Editors around the world want the magazines to reflect their commitment to the health of the models who appear on the pages and the well-being of their readers."

The topic is big in fashion circles online today, and as usual Twitter is abuzz with reactions. As you might expect, the tone is generally positive, although there is a subset of fans who are expressing disappointment that this move took so long, or that it's considered forward-thinking or progressive.

The CFDA ruling resulted in age restrictions and healthy working environment commitments at New York Fashion Week, while the British Fashion Council and London Fashion Week designers have agreements in place to ensure models are at least 16 years of age. Italy, Spain and Israel have all taken measures to keep ultra-skinny models off of catwalks.

The Vogue decision is different for a couple of reasons. First, far more people read Vogue than attend fashion shows, or even read or view fashion show coverage. The effects of this decision are therefore much more far-reaching than banning too-skinny models from New York Fashion Week. Second, the Vogue decision comes complete with a "six-point pact," which includes actionable, enforceable directives such as ID checks at photo shoots and the creation of mentoring programs and industry awareness education.

What are your thoughts? Is Vogue offering too little, too late, or is this the first step in a revolution in the fashion world?

Keep the Houston Press Free... Since we started the Houston Press, it has been defined as the free, independent voice of Houston, and we would like to keep it that way. Offering our readers free access to incisive coverage of local news, food and culture. Producing stories on everything from political scandals to the hottest new bands, with gutsy reporting, stylish writing, and staffers who've won everything from the Society of Professional Journalists' Sigma Delta Chi feature-writing award to the Casey Medal for Meritorious Journalism. But with local journalism's existence under siege and advertising revenue setbacks having a larger impact, it is important now more than ever for us to rally support behind funding our local journalism. You can help by participating in our "I Support" membership program, allowing us to keep covering Houston with no paywalls.

We use cookies to collect and analyze information on site performance and usage, and to enhance and customize content and advertisements. By clicking 'X' or continuing to use the site, you agree to allow cookies to be placed. To find out more, visit our cookies policy and our privacy policy.


Join the Press community and help support independent local journalism in Houston.


Join the Press community and help support independent local journalism in Houston.