Socks have always struck me as being slightly more expensive than Iโd like. Iโm not even talking about the fancy socks you hear advertised on podcasts, but the regular bag of socks you might pick up at a Target. I buy them, of course, because my feet have earned them, but the sticker shock always gets me. Which is to say, when I look at that photo John Rich of Big & Rich fame posted on Twitter of his soundman still wearing the Nike socks he felt compelled to cut up because he disagreed with their decision to hire Colin Kaepernick, I get it. When you donโt have time to properly vet every sock manufacturer out there, sometimes you just have to wear the socks* you cut up.
Now, plenty of people have dunked on Rich and his soundman because of said photo, and rightly so. Iโm all in favor of economic protests, and if youโd rather destroy your coffeemaker or set your sneakers on fire because you canโt agree with a company’s policy, you do you. But the fact that this dude is still wearing his socks after he cut the logos off just tells me that Nike socks are so good that even when youโre super mad at them you just don’t want to get rid of them. Thatโs quality I can get behind.
The thing is, that photo isnโt even the most embarrassing part of the tweet. The embarrassing part is the last line, in which Rich states, โGet ready @Nike multiply that by the millions.โ Oh yes, a nation of millions turns its head to the guy who co-wrote โSave a Horse (Ride a Cowboy)โ for their marching orders. Iโll confess I was shocked to learn that John Rich commanded such an audience. Surely if he was going to be the one to take Nike down, his success in music must be much greater than Iโve been led to believe. Surely he must be selling tons of records if he’s going to get millions to turn against one of the most powerful clothing brands in history.
But then I got to the biggest plot twist in this entire story: Big & Rich have never had an album reach the top of the Billboard 200 and have never had a single in the Billboard Hot 100 top 10.
Huh.
Can we talk about โsnowflakesโ for a minute? As an insult, itโs overused to hell, and rarely in a manner that isnโt completely hypocritical. But isnโt it weird that itโs used almost exclusively to mean โtoo sensitiveโ? Itโs taken away from the twisted beauty of the original insult. Letโs be honest, John Rich is a complete snowflake, the type of guy who thinks because heโs marginally talented heโs special, and thus thinks heโs going to change the world by showing people a pair of poorly cut up socks.
Tuesday morning, Nikeโs stocks were down 2 percent, and I bet John Rich was somewhere feeling really good about himself, thinking his life is finally going to be more than novelty country songs. I wonder if he looked up Adidas and Puma stocks as well, because they were also down 2 percent, and they didnโt sign Colin Kaepernick. Weird how that works.
*You know, John Rich seems like a decent enough boss, the type of person who will let you protest on the company dime about how other people shouldnโt protest on the company dime, but if youโre a music star with nearly 200,000 Twitter followers, canโt you do your soundman a solid and get him a good pair of socks at a momentโs notice? Do they not have Walmarts on the Redneck Riviera? (Oh God, is this all a ploy because Rich is getting into the sock market?)
This article appears in Jan 1 โ Dec 31, 2018.
