I came across an article on the Internet recently discussing whether or not calling the family cat or dog a โ€œpetโ€ should be considered politically incorrect. The article, โ€œJournal of Animal Ethics: Banning Common Words That Describe Pets and Other Animalsโ€ is actually a few years old; it was published in Psychology Today in 2011. However, since I’m an animal lover, the topic piqued my interest and seems as timely today as it did four years ago.

The gist of the article is that the good people at the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics, which publishes the Journal of Animal Ethics, find the word “pet” derogatory. They advocate the terms โ€œanimal companionโ€ or โ€œcompanion animalโ€ instead. In lieu of โ€œownersโ€ or โ€œmasters,โ€ people should be known as โ€œhuman carersโ€ or โ€œguardians.โ€ Even the word โ€œwildlifeโ€ should be replaced with the term โ€œfree living animal.โ€

The experts at Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics arenโ€™t alone in their findings either. The University of Illinois, Penn State University and animal rights activists around the globe support avoiding language that negatively affects the way animals are viewed and/or treated. Iโ€™m not sure I agree with everything they say โ€“ the words โ€œpetโ€ and โ€œwildlifeโ€ have very positive connotations in my mind โ€“ but it did get me to thinking about all the different ways in which we use animal references in everyday figures of speech that place animals in an unflattering light.

For example:
โ€“ Someone cunning is โ€œsly like a foxโ€
โ€“ Someone devious is โ€œSneaky as a weaselโ€
โ€“ Someone scared is โ€œchickenโ€
โ€“ Someone overweight is a โ€œfat cowโ€
โ€“ Someone messy is โ€œfilthy as a pigโ€
โ€“ Someone choosy is โ€œfinicky as a catโ€
โ€“ Someone angry is โ€œmad as a wet henโ€
โ€“ Someone unintelligent is โ€œdumb as an oxโ€
โ€“ Someone frivolous is โ€œsilly as a gooseโ€
โ€“ Someone with bad eyesight is โ€œblind as a batโ€
โ€“ Someone who dawdles is โ€œslow as a turtleโ€
โ€“ Someone arrogant is โ€œproud as a peacockโ€ or โ€œpuffed up like a peacockโ€
โ€“ Someone slimy is โ€œslippery as an eelโ€
โ€“ Someone cruel is โ€œmean as a snakeโ€
โ€“ Someone obstinate is โ€œstubborn as a goatโ€
โ€“ Someone inebriated is โ€œdrunk as a skunkโ€
โ€“ Someone with low character is a โ€œlow-down dirty dogโ€ or a โ€œratโ€
โ€“ Someone clumsy is compared to a โ€œbull in a china shopโ€
โ€“ A philanderer is referred to as a โ€œwolfโ€
โ€“ Feuding girls get in โ€œcat fightsโ€
โ€“ Getting caught unaware compares to โ€œdeer in the headlightsโ€
โ€“ People without minds of their own โ€œfollow like sheepโ€

The list goes on, but you get the point. Itโ€™s time to stop the name-calling and stereotyping! Skunks are notorious teetotalers, itโ€™s not finicky to know what you want, brawn doesnโ€™t necessarily exclude brains, and as for being fatโ€ฆenough with the body shaming already; beauty comes in all shapes and sizes.

In this day and age, when weโ€™re encouraged to respect diversity in people, maybe it is time we learned to apply that same philosophy to our four-legged, scaled and feathered friends as well. Humor aside, there is power in words. Words affect the way we view animals the same way they influence the way we view humans, which means our word choices have the power to affect the way we treat and interact with animals.

Just think of the difference in the images conjured up by the examples listed previously versus the following: wise as an owl; graceful as a swan; brave as a lion. Negative connotations reflect negative attitudes; positive connotations reflect positive attitudes. Itโ€™s just human nature.