I came across an article on the Internet recently discussing whether or not calling the family cat or dog a โpetโ should be considered politically incorrect. The article, โJournal of Animal Ethics: Banning Common Words That Describe Pets and Other Animalsโ is actually a few years old; it was published in Psychology Today in 2011. However, since I’m an animal lover, the topic piqued my interest and seems as timely today as it did four years ago.
The gist of the article is that the good people at the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics, which publishes the Journal of Animal Ethics, find the word “pet” derogatory. They advocate the terms โanimal companionโ or โcompanion animalโ instead. In lieu of โownersโ or โmasters,โ people should be known as โhuman carersโ or โguardians.โ Even the word โwildlifeโ should be replaced with the term โfree living animal.โ
The experts at Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics arenโt alone in their findings either. The University of Illinois, Penn State University and animal rights activists around the globe support avoiding language that negatively affects the way animals are viewed and/or treated. Iโm not sure I agree with everything they say โ the words โpetโ and โwildlifeโ have very positive connotations in my mind โ but it did get me to thinking about all the different ways in which we use animal references in everyday figures of speech that place animals in an unflattering light.
For example:
โ Someone cunning is โsly like a foxโ
โ Someone devious is โSneaky as a weaselโ
โ Someone scared is โchickenโ
โ Someone overweight is a โfat cowโ
โ Someone messy is โfilthy as a pigโ
โ Someone choosy is โfinicky as a catโ
โ Someone angry is โmad as a wet henโ
โ Someone unintelligent is โdumb as an oxโ
โ Someone frivolous is โsilly as a gooseโ
โ Someone with bad eyesight is โblind as a batโ
โ Someone who dawdles is โslow as a turtleโ
โ Someone arrogant is โproud as a peacockโ or โpuffed up like a peacockโ
โ Someone slimy is โslippery as an eelโ
โ Someone cruel is โmean as a snakeโ
โ Someone obstinate is โstubborn as a goatโ
โ Someone inebriated is โdrunk as a skunkโ
โ Someone with low character is a โlow-down dirty dogโ or a โratโ
โ Someone clumsy is compared to a โbull in a china shopโ
โ A philanderer is referred to as a โwolfโ
โ Feuding girls get in โcat fightsโ
โ Getting caught unaware compares to โdeer in the headlightsโ
โ People without minds of their own โfollow like sheepโ
The list goes on, but you get the point. Itโs time to stop the name-calling and stereotyping! Skunks are notorious teetotalers, itโs not finicky to know what you want, brawn doesnโt necessarily exclude brains, and as for being fatโฆenough with the body shaming already; beauty comes in all shapes and sizes.
In this day and age, when weโre encouraged to respect diversity in people, maybe it is time we learned to apply that same philosophy to our four-legged, scaled and feathered friends as well. Humor aside, there is power in words. Words affect the way we view animals the same way they influence the way we view humans, which means our word choices have the power to affect the way we treat and interact with animals.
Just think of the difference in the images conjured up by the examples listed previously versus the following: wise as an owl; graceful as a swan; brave as a lion. Negative connotations reflect negative attitudes; positive connotations reflect positive attitudes. Itโs just human nature.
This article appears in Oct 22-28, 2015.
